the supreme court has consistently struck those dampier the question has always been if there is something fundamentally -- struck those down. the question has always been if there is something fundamentally different between cable and the internet. the court of appeals did not say that you treat the media -- the broadcast media the same as all the others. the supreme court pastelist to do that. what it said is broadcasters are entitled to the same clear criteria so that they can structure their broadcast in a way that does not force them to end up running afoul of the indecency standards that the commission has adopted an expose them to potentially ruinous fines. >> carter phillips was the attorney in this case for fox television stations. also joining us on "the communicators," kim hart. >> in the decision, they bring up the media landscape that would have been almost unrecognizable in 1978. how do you see this evolving media landscape that is changing on an almost daily basis -- there are lots more opportunities for entertainment on the internet, cable, broadcast -- where do you see thi