dan arbess. good morning. thank you for being here. >> good morning, andrew. >> i'm very confused. see on the set. i took your op ed talking about helicopter money and handed it to richard fisher. and he sort of did that to me back. so he didn't sort of seem to be agreeing with you. you said you agree with everything he just said. it suggested you wanted to dump more money. >> richard read the headline. the headline was called the unfinished recovery. this op ed was meant to be a parable of what could happen if congress doesn't step up with fiscal policy. i'm not advocating bring on the helicopter money. what happened if we reach the end of efficacy? what more might be available to the fed to bypass the blog in washington. it is about we don't want to cut taxes and we don't want to make investments in the economy. because doing that will worsen the deficit and debt problem. how do you get more money into the economy without increasing the debt? this is a mechanism that allows you to do that. >> explain mechanism. >> congress has a qe policy where they print money. they use it to bu