also expected to be in that meeting, fbi director christopher wray and dni dan coats. we'll be right back. your digestive system has billions of bacteria, but life can throw them off balance. try align, the #1 doctor recommended probiotic. with a unique strain that re-aligns your system. re-align yourself, with align. >>> what happens to working together? what happened to reaching across the aisle to get something done? what happened to compromise? more than three-quarters of americans say bipartisanship is important, but only 19% of you say republicans and democrats are any good at it. so what would happen if a democrat and republican ran on the same ticket? my next guests may be doing just that. they're rumored to be considering a joint ticket for florida governor, patrick murphy, the democrat who represented florida's 18th congressional district from 2013 until last year. and david jolley is a republican who represented florida's 13th district until last year. so? is there anything you want to announce right now? >> not quite. not quite. no. we haven't made a final

just yesterday, dan coats wrote in "usa today" she is a person of high integrity with valuable front-line and executive experience who is willing to speak truth to power when required on behalf of our nation. gina haspel is the right woman at the right time. her nomination has support from national security leaders and senators in both parties. there is no reason why her confirmation should be delayed, and i look forward to advancing it expeditiously following the committee's action. now, mr. president, on another matter, over the last 20 years, the internet has yielded progress that was the stuff of science fiction just a generation ago. in so many ways, it has spawned a new economy and fostered new connections across the country and the world. in large part, this success is owed to a bipartisan consensus that washington should be largely hands off. but, of course, like every exciting new frontier of the economy, the internet attracted attention from the crowd that prefers to regulate first and ask questions later. in 2015, president obama's f.c.c. set out to fix what wasn't broken. it i

former senator dan coats and also to secretary of state mike pam peo both of them before the senate senate last week or the week before perhaps said that they thought iran wasn't the point why did he add this does he know something about our intelligence that maybe his own security people don't know well the i.a.e.a. similarly has agreed that they have been comply international atomic energy correct agency and. the problem is is that he believes that the spirit of the agreement has been violated and and he feels that iran is not giving the inspectors full access to certain military facilities and that's what he he wants that once those opened up now the europeans will have an opportunity to talk to iran over the next up to one hundred eighty days and try to work something out and. rouhani the president of iran has basically said that if since the united states has dropped out they still intend to stay in it the europeans will stay in it but the problem will be in the longer term of what the economic impact will be should president trump initiate or impose sanctions against those com

new details on the president's meeting with chris wray, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein and dan coats, the director of national intelligence, and all that led up to it including the deal it ended with. the question being did the pit himself blink. let's take a look at what this incident amounts to because keeping them honest, we know what this is. we've seen this before from president trump, his surrogates and others when special counsel mueller makes a move. late today the president met with wray, rosenstein and coats about his demand that the justice department investigate whether the fbi infiltrated or surveilled his campaign. though it was scheduled a while back, this meeting, it followed this tweet yesterday from the president. i here by demand and will do so tomorrow that the department of justice look into whether the fbi/doj infiltrated or surveilled the trump campaign for political purposes. they want the probe to include the president's concerns. here's how the vice president responded to that concession. >> the president, i think, is grateful that the department of justice

the president asked other intelligence officials including the director of national intelligence dan coats and the cia director at the time, mike pompeo, that they should somehow pressure or intervene with the fbi to try to get the fbi to drop its investigation into flynn and the russia scandal. so again, this is according to the "new york times" tonight one of the questions that mueller plans to or wants to ask the president, is they want him to describe his contact with intelligence officials after comey's bombshell congressional testimony in march, where he said that there is an active counterintelligence investigation into whether or not anyone in the trump campaign colluded with russia in its attack. what did you think and do in reaction to the news that the special counsel was speaking to mr. rogers, mr. pompeo, and mr. coats? hmm. this seems new. as noted here by michael schmidt in the "times," it is not clear whether mr. mueller knows something special about trump's reaction to these interviews. but the question shows that mr. mueller is keenly interested in how trump responded to

do in reaction of the news that the special counsel was speaking to rogers, head of the nsa and dan coats and mike pompeo. their leadership have all been interviewed by mueller. why would mueller want to ask about the president what he thought about and did in reaction of news in those interviews have taken place >> we have to backup a little. we have reporting including from james comey that the president reached out to him saying flynn is a good guy, you may want to drop this and go easy on him. he had a similar conversation with other people, pompeo and coates and others or had a reaction to conversations he had with other people and share that reaction with folks in the white house, absolutely of interest of prosecutors. it also goes to intent. what was the president thinking a t the time that these conversations took place. did he tell anybody do anything about it? that's why i think, rachel, these are topics rather than questions. i can imagine theech one taeach long time to get through. >> as i said, we threw the show away because this story broke as i was sitting to start this hou

people like dan coats, the intelligence community. dan coats is his own guy.as that we know of nothing within iran's action that would constitute a violation of the deal. that's the same thing he was hearing from his advisors before he got bolton and pompeo at cia. this is a victory for iran because it creates distance between the united states and our european allies. secondly, it accelerates regional insecurity in the middle east. it also is going to have an impact on global oil supplies. we don't know where that's going to go. could drive up prices. it's so funny. in the speech, he said you know, in seven years, iran is going to be free under the terms of this deal to create nuclear weapons. guess what. "the washington post" gave him four pinocchios. no chance, not true. doesn't seem to matter. you always say this is team sports. if this is about team sports and politics, i guess trump's people are going to say great. but if you care about preventing iran from getting a nuclear weapon, i think you have to say sad, sad, sad. >> kimberly: awesome, awesome, su

christopher wray and dan coats. after the presidents weekend tweed calling on the justice department to investigate claims about the informant, the department quickly and on sunday the expansion of an internal investigation into alleged government surveillance abuse. the new of inquiry will consider whether there was any impropriety or political motivation and how the fbi obtained surveillance warrants were used informants to collect intelligence. the vice president told fox's martha maccallum the administration wants clarity and closure. a speaker the president think is grateful that the department of justice was going to have the inspector general look into it and determine and ensure that there was no surveillance done for political purposes. against our campaign. i think it would be very troubling to millions of americans if that took place. >> a source tells fox news the republican chairman of the house intelligence and oversight committees, devin nunes and trey gowdy, want a discrete set of records about 200 r

this meeting with the justice department and the deputy -- the director of national intelligence dan coates also in the meeting with the president and we should point out, a source familiar with the discussions on the russia investigation here at the white house says that the president's tweets about his confidential source we saw this morning, that they may be hyperbolic, yes, but the source added there are real concerns inside the white house as to what the confidential source was up to during the campaign and hearing the discussions inside of the white house and until those concerns are addressed and it sounds like they are trying to address them over the justice department, it is likely that the president's rants will continue. so we may see as a result of all this, wolf, if they don't get what they want inside of the white house and among thei -- te critics of the investigation and the president will go back on social media and attacking the justice department over the handling of the probe. wolf. >> thank you very much. >>> and this is happening -- as this is happening, the president'

dan coates the director of national intelligence said the same thing and mike pompeo said there is no evidence iran has violated the terms of the agreement. has the president come up with some specific new violations that justify this action? >> he hinted at something new but the fact is the intelligence doesn't back it up. on compliance with the iran nuclear deal, u.s. intelligence agencies, officials an the president's appointees and the secretary of state mike pompeo during his confirmation and dan coates the director of national intelligence say that iran is complying with the deal. what president trump referred to was new israeli intelligence about what iran's intentions were regarding having a nuclear weapons program. now we know from my colleague, our colleague orren leiberman, the prime minister ben mit netanyahu said the most recent documents in the new developments date back to 2005 so more than ten years ago. we also know that the u.s. assessed in 2007 that iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. that intelligence has not changed. this dates back but the president i

learning today about the meeting that took place the president had with fbi director chris wray and dan coats. >> it was a regularly scheduled meeting on the agenda before the weekend storm online on twitter. it is nothing regular about this meeting. the fact is the president was asking the department of justice to essentially investigate the investigators. this is something that the president's don't normally do. the justice department should be an oasis. they were sitting in a meeting together for an hour or so. we haven't gotten much of a read out in term of the mood. we saw them walk out and they were smiling they had smiles on their face. all we know is this, we know the president has essentially been successful at least in the short term of having the inspector general at the department of justice look into this. in fact a confidential source inside the campaign giving fbi the information. there's some conservatives who believe rod rosenstein is not going far enough. they believe he informant they would like him to step aside. they think the i.g. is putting on a shelf. not necessarily t

department, summoning rod rosenstein along with christopher wray, and director of national intelligence dan coates to the white house today for a closed door meeting over the fbi's use of a confidential source during a confidential campaign. the president was livid in a tweet this weekend over what he suggested was fbi and doj infiltration and surveillance of the trump campaign, demanding investigation. now he is asking the inspector general to look into the white house's claims. and john kelly is setting up a meeting with the fbi, the doj and the dni, along with congressional leaders to share highly classified information. democrats demanding a seat at the table for that meeting. but what does all of this really mean? will the justice department be forced to turn over classified documents on the fbi source, documents subpoenaed by house intel chairman trump ally devin nunes? sources tell cnn advisers outside the white house has been workin asser part of a deep state anti-trump plot. that includes cordavid bossi an steve cortes. more on that in a moment as well. there are a lot of pretty shocking

jeff sessions and several other members of the cabinet including national intelligence director dan coats.

dan coates and who else will be there?>> we have a wide range of folks coming to the white house but the reason they're coming is because they need to get to the bottom of this. the president has instructed they do just that. this is absolutely ridiculous at this point two years into a phony investigation with no evidence and now we're finding out these reports about a potential spy in the campaign? the people of this country have a right to know about it. the president has demanded they release this information. and hopefully we'll get to the bottom of it. they need to understand what has happened here and what has occurred. the american people deserve nothing else less. >> sandra: were any democrats invited? >> they weren't. they aren't asking for the information. it appears they don't want to see light shed on this particular investigation. the president is right in that tweet. spy gate, if it occurred, could be one of the biggest scandals in history. the democrats know it and i don't think they want to be near it when

but that goes against what dan coats the director of national intelligence, what mike pompeo, the former cia director, now the secretary of state have both said in recent weeks, that iran is in compliance with the agreement. >> it's not clear what that definitive proof is. intelligence officials briefed on the he will intelligence told me as recent as this morning that even the in the net information did not change their assessment that iran was in compliance. that was information that was several months old. it is not clear what the definitive proof is. but as you pointed to you had. trump appointed officials in the last six weeks have said that based on the terms of this agreement that iran was in compliance. have a listen to two of them. >> is it the judgment of the intelligence community that iran has thus far adhered to the deal's major provisions? >> yes. the judgment is there has been no material breach of the agreement. >> do you have any evidence to dispute the iaea assessment that iran is in full compliance with the jcpoa? >> senator twrks the information that i have been provi

it's james mattis and dan coats. >> the key question is if that is the case, why does macron in france and others agree this deal could be stronger. >> because they have been trying to placate trump who decided he wants to back out of the deal despite the fact that it's working. our entire intelligence community says it's working. charles: not the entire military community. you are wrong on that. you name one chief of staff. charles: can you have a little bit of respect, please, and let the other guests speak. >> there is a lot of speculation here, we do not have the opinions of all the current apparatus, and that's why we don't want former administration officials freelancing on these issues. i think it was a very good point that europeans -- it's called placating, but improving a bad deal is something all americans should be in favor of. i don't trust the iranian government to be taken at its face value. i look forward to seeing what the president does. he knows what he's doing, and he's the only person who gets to speak on behalf of the government on this point. >> ron, one thing i

chairman nunes, and trey gowdy, and fbi director christopher wray, director of national intelligence, dan coats and department of justice official ed o'callaghan. nearly 2 dozen house republicans, calling for a second special counsel, preliminary t purpose to investigate a proud range of allegations again the justice department. and 3 year period to include clinton e-mail investigation, and surveillance abuse and how and why russia investigation began at all in to the trump campaign. first guest, one of those backing the new resolution, joining us congressman ron desantos, member of several key committees. he leader republican candidate for governor of florida. congressman great to have you with us, start with call for a second special counsel. your thoughts about how likely it is that resolution will influence the out come. >> i hope it does. think about it. you have a situation whereas you suggested, doj and fbi will be under the microscope, but i want to know people like john brennan, at cia, what if any involvement that institution had with some of the individuals. i don't think it was all

and dan coats, calling on justice department on investigate claims, the deputy announced sunday expansion of a investigation into alleged government surveillance abuse, new line of inquiry will consider if there any political mosmotivation how they used warrants or collected intelligence. administration's clarity and closure. >> president is grateful, that department of justice is going to have inspector general look into it and ensure that there was no surveillance done for political purposes, against our campaign, i think it would be very troubling to millions of americans if that took place. reporter: a source told fox news that republican of chairman house intollgence -- want a discreet set of records in their weather work was used in russia case or obtain servais len war ans on carter page. >> give us documenttation you use to start this investigation. reporter: on senate floor, minority leader said that president's call for parallel investigation set a bad precedent. >> a misguided view that department of justice is there to protect his political interest. reporter: president's lar

reporter: the briefing was given by fbi director christopher wray, rod rosenstein and dan coats. adame schiff released a statement saying the president's legal team expects to use information gleaned improperly from the justice department to their legal advantage. republicans say they just want the truth. >> there are serious questions that need to be answered. from my standpoint the top priority of this investigation is to reveal to the public exactly what happened so we can restore confidence in beth the fbi and department of justice. reporter: the president dubbing this spygate saying this is a huge political scandal. kennedy: edward lawrence, thank you very much for that. for a guy who likes to brag about his friendship with bill belichik, he doesn't appear to be a big fan of spying. is spygate going nowhere like deflategate? joining me dennis miller. they is. >> how is adam schiff with hair look balder than reporter eddie lawrence? when you still have hair and the guy introduction your clip is totally bald, and you look balder with the hair, bad touch. kennedy: the michael j

. >> dan coates is supposed to be in charge of it.s supposed to report to him and they report to the president. threat's get to the bottom of this thing. lou: here's the other thing about the group of people. i also would like to know one thing. if there was meddling in the 2016 election, why didn't one of you people find out well in advance of its occurrence because that's what you do, you spy, and you mount counter intelligence and why didn't you do something about that meddling before the november election of 2016? >2016 ? and they did. you know what else they haven't done anything about? they can't do anything about cyberattacks. everybody figures if they keep their mouths shut, people with steal billion billions of dollam this country every year. we're watching china take half a trillion dollars out of the country. >> we spend $80 billion on intelligence gathering. that's what we know. lou: an informed number but not necessarily the right number. >> the president has a right to know. these people work for him. he's the chief exec

, rod rosenstein along with director christopher wray and the director of national intelligence, dan coatsa closed door meeting over the fbi's use of a confidential source during the presidential campaign. the president was livid over the weekend over what he suggested infiltration, a surveillance of the trump

i'm also honored the president and director of national intelligence, dan coats have the trust and confidence in me to fill this position. i would first like to express gratitude for my family. my father, john, mother, barbara, brother, stephen, sister, tonya and most especially a wife, julianne and my son dominic. last, i would like to thank the women and men of the national counterintelligence city center who are dedicated professionals into success is the last few years that made ncsc a global leader in counterintelligence security. mr. chairman, i was born and raised in pennsylvania from a small town just north of scranton. they are coming through my family and friends, with value, integrity, hard work and service to others. genome early in the first-class army in world war ii was awarded the medal of honor, two purple hearts and a bronze star for heroic activities in the battle of the bulge. spending time with other role models growing up i learned a valuable of character, citizenship and service and we should never take your democracy or freedom for granted. i am proud to be a public se

fbi director chris wray, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein, director of national intelligence dan coatsthe white house. this comes as the president is demanding answers over a series of reports that an fbi informant was in contact with associates of his campaign. trumpet tweeting that the doj needs to investigate if the campaign was "infiltrated or surveilled and if the obama administration was involved."

, rod rosenstein along with director christopher wray and the director of national intelligence, dan coats, today through a closed door meeting over the fbi's use of a confidential source during the presidential campaign. the president was livid over the weekend over what he suggested infiltration, a surveillance of the trump campaign, demanding an investigation. now the doj is asking the attorney general to look into the president's claims. they're setting up a meeting with the doj along with congressional leaders to share highly classified information, democrats demanding a seat at the table for that meeting. what does all of this really mean? will the justice department be forced to turn over highly classified documents on the fbi source, documents subpoenaed by house intel chairman and trump ally devin nunes? a lot to get to in the coming hours here on cnn. i want to bring in senior economics analyst stephen moore who was a senior adviser to the trump campaign. also global affairs max booth, the author of "the road not taken." stephen, the president is demanding an investigation of the

the four intel chiefs that donald trump actually nominated and were approved by the senate, saw dan coats, testifying back what was that in january i think? saw then c.i.a. director mike pompeo testifying to the fact that the russians tried to influence the election. tried to turn it in donald trump's direction. that the fbi director suggested the same thing. mike barnicle, they all, all suggested in what would become a front-page news story, that russia tried to impact the election for donald trump. and the senate again, in a bipartisan manner, the senate intel committee all said, that they were concurring with the intel community's assessment. they had no reason to disagree with the intel community's conclusions. and here you have someone who is supposed to be in charge of protecting our homeland, and someone who i was told actually had, had been working on stopping russian interference in the 2018 and 2020 elections, claiming in a most peculiar way absolute ignorance of any russian meddling or russian -- or russian, a conclusion by our entire intel community that the russians were tryi

attorney general rod rosenstein, dan coates and devin nunes and trey gowdy.rs later will have the same along with devin nunes' intelligence leaders, adam schiff, mark warner, nancy pelosi and chuck schumer. earlier, pelosi wrote to rosenstein it is improper, the dissemination of the president of investigative information to the president's staunches, defenders in congress and ultimately to the president's legal defense team. speaking to reporters on the south lawn, a necessary exercise in transparency. >> i want them all to get together and i want them, cause everybody wants this solved. but a lot of bad things have happened. we now call it spygate. you are calling it spygate. a lot of bad things happened. they will sit in a room and hopefully work it out among themselves. >> mr. president, why won't you sigh -- >> they are all going to be in the room tomorrow. we will see what happens. what i want is i want total transparency. this issue supersedes the party. this supersedes republicans and democrats. so, what i want from rod, from the fbi, from everybody, w

at this hour with his most most senior officials including rod rosenstein, christopher wray and dan coats who oversees 17 intelligence agencies after the president's call for an inn vestgation. the justice department announ announcing a new investigation. the line of inquiry if there was political motivation in how the fbi used agents to collect ed. if anybody did infiltrate in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action. as part of the reporting, fox news learned the oversight committees devin nunes and trey gowdy want records related to the intelligence source and whether information from that source was used in the russia case or for object taping surveillance forms. >> i can tell you nobody was interested in an informant. we asked for documents that we have not received from the department of justice. so they continue to leak out things about this informant and we don't know if there's one informant or more informants because there's so much out there now that it's really getting tough to follow and all we're asking for is g

gowdy, the chairman of the house oversight committee and rod rosenstein's deputy and chris wray and dan coates will all be getting together. the chief of staff john kelly telling the department of justice and the f.b.i. and the d.n.i. to work to get chairman nunes and gowdy the docksments -- documents they want about the fisa surveillance of the trump campaign and the latest revelation about the f.b.i. informant. sources tell fox news the chairman are aren't optimistic getting what they want but going down there to see what they can possibly get. there are concerns that chief of staff john kelly will not actually be at that meeting and the chairmen are worried that the department of justice may use this as just another excuse to stone wall. you mentioned the president leaving the white house in about an hours time headed to long island for a round table on ms-13 with 10,000 members in the united states. the president repeating his use of the word animals to describe ms-13 and getting a lot of backup on that from his political supporters. >> john roberts at the white house. >> jon: as john just

fbi director chris wray, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein, director of national intelligence dan coats at the white house. this comes as the president is demanding answers over a series of reports that an fbi informant was in contact with associates of his campaign. trumpet tweeting that the doj needs to investigate if the campaign was "infiltrated or surveilled and if the obama administration was involved." doj is responding by asking its inspector general to look at these allegations. vice president-elect pence is reacting to the latest development in a sit down with martha maccallum. >> the president i think he is grateful that the department of justice is going to have the inspector general look into it and determine and ensure that there was no surveillance done for political purposes. against our campaign. i think it would be very troubling to millions of americans of that took place. >> jesse: house committee chairman devin nunes is saying if this is true, it's a major scandal. >> if they ran a spy ring or informant ring and they were paying people within the trump campaign, if

the department of justice will be there with chris wray, the director of the fbi and dan coats, who was the director of national intelligence. the president in a meeting monday in the oval office with rod rosenstein and christopher wray directed the department to work with nunes and gowdy to get them access to documents they had been looking for. john kelly was also in the meeting and the day after called the doj to set all of this up. on his way out of town to go to the ms-13 roundtable, i asked the president about setting up that meeting. here's what he told me. >> i want them all to get together. everybody wants this solved. a lot of bad things have happened. we now call it spygate. you're calling it spygate. a lot of bad things have happened. i want them to get together, sit in a room and work it out among themselves. >> no democrats were invited to the meeting, which they have been making a big deal about. the senate minority leader, chuck schumer said it smacks of banana republic politics. listen to schumer. >> leader pelosi and i are sending a letter to attorney general rosenstei

the scope of the fbi investigation there was some pressure applied by the president to try to get dan coats, the director of national intelligence to try to put some pressure on comey to slow down that investigation or maybe limited scope. this was the first we heard where they said what did you think and what did you do when you learned that the special counsel was going to talk to your top intelligence officials. now, it's possible, of course, that's just an open ended question. bob mueller is just curious. more likely the investigators have obtained some information from those intelligence officials or others they've interview second-degred at the that made them intrigued. >> that's a perfect segue to ask barbara. what do you think they're going after? this is part of a negotiation trying to get lawyers and the president to agree to an interview. so many of these questions have to do with his time in office and with possible obstruction charges, right? not with the russia probe. >> i think so. more than half relate to what appears to be obstruction of justice, there's still a sizable num

i'm also honored that the president and director of national intelligence, dan coates, have the trust and confidence in me to fulfill this position. i would like to express my gratitude to my family. my father john, my mother barbara, my brother steven, my sister tanya. most especially, to my wife julie ann and my sons dominic and will. lastly, i would like to thapg the women and men of the national counterintelligence security center who are dedicated professionals and their successes have made ncsc the global leader in counterintelligence and security. mr. chairman, i was born and raised in pennsylvania, a small blue collar town just north of scranton. there through my family and friends i won the value of integrity, hard work and service to others. one of those neighbors was gene owe murlly, private first class in the army during world war ii. he was awarded the medal of honor, two purple hearts and a bronze star for his heroic activities in the battle of the bulge. spending time with him and other role models, i learned the value of character, citizenship and service. and we shoul

senators push back on the cia is a let's at least have dan coats, the director of national intelligenceke a decision on what can be classified or declassified. the cia rejected that. the cia was engaged in an aggressive public relations campaign to get haspel confirmed. so with the minority stuff from the democratic staff on the intelligence committee did, is drawing on the classified information that they have access to, they put together roughly a 23 page memo that outlined her role in running the black site and overseeing and advocating for torture, and her central role in destroying the evidence around that torture. they tried to keep it compact because senators are not known for sitting and reading long reports. trump gets made fun of for wanting everything to be one page, but there are not many senators who want more than that. but the problem was, it is classified. the solution they had previously was that it was in the basement in this room, senate security and aso you as a senator staffer could go down and review it. as a got closer to the vote on wednesday, the document was pu

jeff, what are you learning about today the meeting at the white house with chris raid, rosenstein dan coates? >> it was on the agenda before the president's weekend storm online on twitter, but there was nothing regular about the meeting. the president wasn't asking the justice department to essentially investigate the investigators, as you were saying. this is something that presidents don't formally do. the justice department should be an island, an oasis. they were all sitting in a meeting together for less than an hour or so. we haven't gotten much of a readout in terms of the mood or temperament. we saw them walk out. they had smiles on their face. all we know is this -- the president has been successful, at least in the short-term of having the inspector general at the office look into this, look to see if there was a confidential source inside his campaign that was giving them information. they want to see if it's going to happen. there are some conservatives who believe rod rosenstein is not going far enough. they believe that he -- obviously they would like him to step aside, but th

dan coats. nunes and gowdy along with the additional fbi and doj are going to be briefers and staff. the second one would be kelly, rosenstein, coat, members gowdy members. everyone stick around we're learning what kind of questions mueller's team will ask jared kushner. those questions don't sound like a witch hunt as the president consistently claimed. ♪ ♪ ♪ raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens ♪ ♪ bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens ♪ ♪ brown paper packages tied up with strings ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ at t-mobile, we're committed to keeping military families connected. then momma ninja asked her littlest baby ninja, did you finish your dinner? so in honor of military appreciation month... active duty and veterans get half off select samsung galaxy phones. >>> breaking news tonight, the justice says there's going to be two classified briefings tomorrow. we'll continue to talk about that. we still don't know wheth

general rod rosenstein, fbi director christopher wray and the director of national intelligence dan coats. so media speculation was filled with the question of would rosenstein basically passing of the trump tweet to the inspector general be good enough for the president? will the president demand something grander than a inspector general investigator? will he demand a new special prosecutor when he met with rod rosenstein at 3:00 p.m. today. and once again, rod rosenstein appears to be one of the expert adapters to the presidency of donald trump because the president did accept rod rosenstein's handing off of the president's demand to the inspector general. and so, rod rosenstein did not resign today. that's the big news. rod rosenstein did not resign today. rod rosenstein did not do what most members of previous justice departments would have done if a president publically threatened the integrity of their mission. rod rosenstein did not give the president what the president has wanted so badly for so long, rod rosenstein's resignation. instead, rod rosenstein gave the president an inv