and that's how history is going to look back at the special counsel inquiry. >> well, dan goldman, let i mean, andrew weissmann's book is the third account in so many weeks to point out all of the ground that was not covered by robert mueller, but that mueller's team and others allowed us to think was. and that's namely that his ties to russia were not investigated. mike schmidt's book points out that rod rosenstein narrow thd probe at its outset, telling mueller to focus on crimes. pete strzok reports he has no deal with a counterintelligence investigation went on after he left, he left early in the probe, and andrew weissmann saying they had lying witnesses in manafort, that they were afraid of right-wing media, which was being fueled day in and day out by rudy giuliani's appearances. they had -- as frank just said, they handcuffed themselves by not using their powers to compel an interview with the president under oath, one with answers that were truthful, that he would be held account frbl, and it's not clear that they got their hands on his financial records. >> i think it is clea