my colleague, dan hawkins, discussed the measures with a panel of guests in a short time. no, i mean does less come down to human rights and people deciding what risks they want to take and how they want to live their lives. i mean, people are formed for example, if there is a high rate of smog of pollution, they can say at home or where mosque. so choose safety motors, but surely you know, putting, you know, these, these may measures in place for businesses, for schools, for construction sites. is this too much of a what some people call money sake? i think if we had a government messaging, whether it's kind of a climate change or anything else would be in addition to the emergency. when, when you, when you're talking about things, you have to take measures and then you don't need locked out. let's not get locked down or failure policy last ditch attempts. when governments have no other solution is extremely popular and they don't want to do well when you've got an emergency situation where there's a massive peach in toxic pollution like half a moment that the local gover