. >> my name is dan lungren. i'm from california.when i was attorney general, we handled 52,000 cases per year. i've argued cases before the supreme court and appeared before the california supreme court. i was the lead plaintiff in the parental consent case for california, american academy of pediatrics v. lundgren, the name to defend it in that case. so i have little experience in the case. there's an area of balal that an executive order cannot supercede. there's been a jurisprudence growing in this country dealing with the hyde amendment and other provisions of federal law. it is simply stated that you have a program dealing with funding of medical procedures -- unless there is a specific limitation on the funding, it is presumed that there is a bright for that funding to include abortion services. -- that there is a right for that funding to include abortion services. therefore, 34 years ago, henry hyde put that amendment forward and house. i remember the battles that we had. not only in the congress, the house and the senate, i