i mean, the reason why i ask you this is that dan needle, who's obviously very respected, he led alligations into nadhim zahawi. he says that under the hmrc rules, you would only be liable for no tax on vicarage road if it was also mark rayner, your then husband, his principal property as well. because a couple can only have one principal property. and then he would have been liable for capital gains when he sold his separate property in april 2016. that's the first condition. the second one is if you spent around £15,000 on home improvements. so you have to meet one or both of those conditions. what dan was saying and he acknowledged is that, look, she could owe nothing, actually, because the rules are complex and these various different ways to which it's calculated. but i got that expert advice, because if i did owe any capital gains tax, i would have said and i would have paid it. but i don't owe any capital gains tax, because of the circumstances. and i've gone through that with a tax expert and they've given me that advice. but he's estimating... that's the point, he's estimati

dan. any easier to thread the needle for these guys, dan?e. we need to keep an eye on what is happening >> the difference today compared to a couple of years ago with the forums is china two years now has not really grown in 2022, terrible growth year and last year, they say it was pretty good with the official numbers, but you cannot see anything growing china with not a lot of growth on the table will not have the same conversations with leaders whether it is ceos or other heads of state and treasury secretaries and other officials around the world >> do you think with some of the people that we mentioned that are so all-in with china, do you think they're disappointed in the pivot that president xi made a couple of years ago? >> you know, i don't think anybody is all-in and hasn't been for a while folks have been hedging back in a prudent way for a good, long while now. everybody has their eyes wide dd they are as business leaders and chinese economists and western economists are disappointed. we're puzzled. china has opportunities to add