but for example, i was watching dan wootton a few days ago.gel farage where dan wootton agreed with everything that nigel farage said on immigration. he then interviewed jim davidson, where he agreed with almost everything jim davidson said about cancel culture. now, the viewers might like that, but it's not a balanced discussion, it's not an impartial discussion, because the presenter is agreeing with the guests a lot of the time. but that is not a news bulletin, as such. and i think you need to understand that, actually, there is a breadth of voices across the schedule on the channel and that is an important part of any rolling news channel. the impartiality exists in its purest form within the news bulletins, which actually are straight down the middle, impartial, traditional news bulletins. yeah. but the reality is that you do have a variety of voices through the day. and again, if i watched at 6.00, you'll have a panel that actually has got a breadth of viewpoints. dan wootton�*s show does mostly have a breadth of viewpoints. it's got his