is there anything under this 9 # 1 this would change the skeem for dang jo no, sir.s there anything in this section to change the scope of prk tis as to what a nurse or doctor can do? >> under existing scat uts, no, sir. >> if there are thorlts, they would remain unchanged. and this would not change any of the laws related to any of the shortage, would it? >> to the extent there is current law on the topics you are laying out, this would not change those statutes. >> time is expired. host: i'm time lichled ever >> become in 1996, i introduced legislation and called it at that time christopher reid. he was a good example of people that. most people don't realize what's in their insurance policies. where this is accute late felt. it is important to note that that has been cured in this bill. members made reference to the lohan report. that was written months before the proviegs. -- it is a refresher -- the organization is owned by united healthcare. united healthcare was the one that came before the investigations in the oversight committee and said we are not changing