they showed a 25000 year old paleolithic figurine, known as the venice, venus of villain dorf daniel benny's again thinks the dispute raises broader questions over who decides what art is? it was also the aim saying it's not about the social media platform to decide what ours, what would be considered as nudity has been part of best, some culture since the roman empire since the greek and everywhere. where there is a men kind of out. there is also a, some of moslin pieces of odds. the chose community. we just question who is going to decide what is about to be shown or not? and we think it should not be an algorithm. more details on your top news stories you can always check out our website r t dot com or follow us on twitter. i'll be back with more news in just about 30 minutes. so stay with us. ah ah, when i was sure think wrong when i just don't hold any rules yet to see how it is be coming to an engagement. it was the trail when suddenly find themselves worlds apart. we choose to look for common ground. ah, this is boom, bought the one business show you can't afford to mit. i'm branch a

of natural history, museum of all signed up to only funds the al patina museums press officer daniel benny has explain them was not a good project because we had an experience that was not always easy, a community in the social media, and that was our experience since a few years as well. i don't know really why there is the censorship. i know it are maybe some algorithm or something on the engines that is not allowing it. i think it's not about an algorithm to define or to sensor or should be seen or not. and then we saw that it would work on only fence and if it's working there, why don't try it. one of the starkest cases of our censorship happened in 2018 when facebook deleted images posted by the austria natural history. museum, branding them pornography. they showed a 25000 year old paleolithic figurine, known as the venus of villain, dove. and daniel been yes. again, things the dispute rate is broader questions of a who decides what art is? it was also the aim saying it's not about the social media platform to decide what are, what would be considered as nudity has been part of some

really good talk to professor benny, thanks indeed daniel care in. so thank mia. mars military is under increasing pressure to engage with its opponents nearly 9 months after seizing power. they've been cause for talks to find a way out of the crisis. even from supporters of the military, of the giantess says that it will not engage with dissidence. including members of on cancer cheese, ousted government, the countries but in turmoil. since the qu, in february, a military crackdown has killed more than 1100 people. gunman have killed at least 10 people in mali in an attack on a base belonging to a paramilitary group known as the gander e. so it happened in the northern region of gao. the group was formed in 2009 of is backed by the army. it's unclear who's responsible for the attack. let's get more from how does eras nicholas hark was monitoring developments from a darker in neighboring senegal. nick, what more do we know? while adrian this attack took place on friday on the bridge of what bar. yeah. which is a key strategic location to protect the

. -- daniel, thank you very much for joining me tonight. there's a lot in one bennyrence to they've already started questioning some volunteer witnesses, that need to be subpoenaed. but let's go to subpoenas, and this week's documents subpoenas. thursday is the due date. if we do not see compliance on thursday, what happens? >> well, there are options that congress and the house can go to court to enforce the subpoenas, which we saw in the last congress. it takes inordinately long, perhaps longer than we have left in this congress to find its way to the courts. they can discuss with the witnesses, lawyers, some accommodation to have them give some documents but not all. but, i think it's all going to be academic, because i would expect donald trump to file a lawsuit -- to prevent the witnesses from providing the documents that are asked based on executive privilege. now, that is going to be legally baseless, it's not his decision to make in the first place. it's joe biden's decision to make. and biden has already indicated that he is not going to assert executive pri

daniel, thank you very much for joining us tonight. there is a lot in what bennyce to they already started questioning volunteer witnesses who didn't need to be subpoenaed but let's go to the subpoenas that that in this week it's document subpoenas that, thursday is the due date. if we do not see compliance on thursday, what happens? >> there are options the house can go to court to enforce the subpoenas that that we saw in congress and it takes long perhaps longer than we have left in this congress to find it's way through the courts. they can discuss with the witnesses, lawyers some accommodation to get some documents if not all and i would expect trump to file a lawsuit to intervene to prevent the witnesses from providing the documents that are asked based on executive privilege. that will be legally baseless. it's not his decision to make in the first place. it's joe biden's decision to make and joe biden indicated he's not going to assert executive privilege but that doesn't stop donald trump from litigating it so the next big date will be next week when all