fielding to steal information related to daniel ellsbe ellsberg's mental health care and that they did thereby injury, oppress, threaten, intimidate dr. fielding in the free exercise and enjoyment of the right and privilege secured to him by the fourth amendment of the constitution. what i found more interesting though is when he explained his reasoning about why he decided to please guiplead guilty to th crimes and that reasoning is contained in his disbarment order, and he basically said i was on a trip with my family, and i had a chance to sort of assess my situation, and here i was, a defendant in a criminal proceeding but presently free, able to attend the church of my choice and be entitled to all of these due process rights, and it felt hypocritical. i felt like if he continued to defend my conduct, how could i do that when these are the same rights that i had invaded that i was now taking advantage of. so sort of the way i started think being it is if we as lawyers sort of constantly thought about how is our conduct, how are our actions impacting others, one, maybe it would det