daniel hale's conscience was so shocked.ad an fbi agent who is disturbed by the domestic war on terror and the surveillance of the muslim community and the evisceration of the bill of rights. he had a man who was convicted of giving information to wikileaks. and then julian assange, the first time in history, journalist has been indicted under the espionage act. all of the charges against julian assange pertained to 2011 revelations about u.s. war crimes in iraq and afghanistan, the u.s. involvement in guantÁnamo, and these corrupt deals that the state department was involved in. donald trump's administration loves the espionage act. they did not use it against traitors or spies, they used it against whistleblowers, journalists, and people accused of giving information to the media. i think that is per significant in and of itself. particularly when you consider there's always been this dual track system under the espionage act. prior to the trump case, i have argued and i think the trump case obligated this, i have argued t

daniel hale is in prison for a blowing the whistle on the drone program and none of the individual. busy is who perpetrated the drug program has been held accountable to my knowledge. many have been promoted within the national security intelligence community. but that's all the more reason why this prosecution is so dangerous because we so desperately need journalism in this area we, we need this truth because it wouldn't have come out without the work of julian assigned. and without the work of the free press or the sources who are providing the information, all of that is necessary to have a healthy democracy. and you know, that's the argument of a growing number of world leaders who are calling for a sondors freedom. they include the australian prime minister, $48.00 members of esther early as parliament, the german parliament, the president of argentine a, the president of mexico and the president of brazil. let's take a listen to let the silva of brazil and what is what you can use, the least you didn't feel a focus to us. then we started to point to. so what was your sense of

. >> daniel, i know you have been looking into this, checking her comments. what do the facts say about this? >> kaitlyn, governor halely'saim that crime is at an all-time high is not accurate. it has fallen steadily with a few short upticks over the last three decades. if you do a graph, you'd see a steep line downward from those early 90s and then a recent flattening out with some ups and downs. we do not have precise numbers for the present day or even last year. crime data takes time to come in. but every expert on this subject will tell you that we're not even close to the numbers of the bad old days of three decades ago. the country's violent crime rate in 1992, for example, was 758 per 100,000 people. in 2020, it was under 400 violent crimes per 100,000 people. 2021 data is a bit dicey but looks roughly similar. during the town hall, i texted with a crime analyst named jeff asher and he confirmed crime has fallen steadily over the last few decades. he said, quote, the nation did experience a historically large increase in murder in 2020. i, daniel, will note that was under president trump. and he continued, and ano

been established by brenda hale and the supreme court or something, essentially , it's a political essentially, it's a political body making a political judgement. now, danielth— could leave the conservative party 7 well, i'm- could leave the conservative party ? g party? well, i'm everything is possible. i don't know. i've no intention of what he's doing . intention of what he's doing. but i say it's a really interesting question at the moment. never say never, i suppose. how it's a really interesting question. how boris sees with the sees his relationship with the conservative party, given that if i were him, i'd be feeling well. i've done a lot for you. and what have you ever done for me? lord daniel moylan, thank you for joining me? lord daniel moylan, thank you forjoining us. you so much forjoining us. what a brilliant conversation. hhaht— what a brilliant conversation. thank-teta- what a brilliant conversation. thank-your time. - what a brilliant conversation. thank your time. now thank you for your time. now whth— thank you for your time. now whth es— thank you for your time. now with news that— thank you for your time. now with news that up a of wit

been established by brenda hale and the supreme court or something, essentially , it's a political essentially, it's a political body making a political judgement. now, danielth— could leave the conservative party 7 well, i'm- could leave the conservative party ? g party? well, i'm everything is possible. i don't know. i've no intention of what he's doing . intention of what he's doing. but i say it's a really interesting question at the moment. never say never, i suppose. how it's a really interesting question. how boris sees with the sees his relationship with the conservative party, given that if i were him, i'd be feeling well. i've done a lot for you. and what have you ever done for me? lord daniel moylan, thank you for joining me? lord daniel moylan, thank you forjoining us. you so much forjoining us. what a brilliant conversation. hhaht— what a brilliant conversation. thank-teta- what a brilliant conversation. thank-your time. - what a brilliant conversation. thank your time. now thank you for your time. now whth— thank you for your time. now whth es— thank you for your time. now with news that— thank you for your time. now with news that up a third