charlie kirk, daniel horowitz. daniel, let me start with you, a question. be some conflicting ideas within the republican party, even within the conservative movement, when it comes to national security and foreign policy of the rand paul position who's more libertarian, somewhat protectionist or isolationist in that regard, i would argue, and then you have the marco rubio position which is almost hyperinterventionist and those aren't the two positions, other positions like the traditional reagan position. can you explain this? >> when we started conservative review, we started out with a scorecard where we wouldn't just rate the members based on votes but give a description what they did on committee assignments, what legislation they proposed? and we had this discussion how do you rate foreign policy and national security? it's not definitive, you don't have doctrines that are clear cut like raising taxes, increasing spending, and we noted this false dichotomy we have in the republican party, it's borne out of the lack of vision among conservatives. you h