daniel kruger who was against this nation said hence you can do much more for people. i have run in parallel encourages where is it dying exist. we should also improve palliative care but as we can seen a lot of coverage, even people who are getting the best palliative care, still wanted it as a choice. this always outside of palliative care and about autonomy and people wanting to exercise choice. ., , ., ~' and people wanting to exercise choice. ., , ., ~ , choice. tell me how you think this bill will work? _ choice. tell me how you think this bill will work? i— choice. tell me how you think this bill will work? i think— choice. tell me how you think this bill will work? i think they're - bill will work? i think they're auoin to bill will work? i think they're going to be _ bill will work? i think they're going to be royal— bill will work? i think they're | going to be royal challengers bill will work? i think they're - going to be royal challengers about how it will work in practice which will be crucial at the committee stage. if you think of what two doctors who ar

we are nowjoined by daniel kruger who is a conservative mp who opened the debate to the opposite sideis argument. what is your reaction to this passing? i’m argument. what is your reaction to this passing?— argument. what is your reaction to this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost — this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost the _ this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost the red _ this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost the red and _ this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost the red and i _ this passing? i'm very disappointed that we lost the red and i was - that we lost the red and i was encouraged by the debate itself. i thought— encouraged by the debate itself. i thought effective out on parliament. although _ thought effective out on parliament. although we lost the vote, it is only— although we lost the vote, it is only the — although we lost the vote, it is only the second reading and a lot of colleagues — only the second reading and a lot of colleagues were saying that they only write about for it but they recognise _ only write about for