even blame be attack on russian secret services. journalist and author, daniel lazar says that you claims a legit involvement in the assassination of the russian reporter is difficult to deny. ukrainian governance, the claims of denials, involvement, cannot be taken face value. the cleaning government lied about the involvement in the area to gain a case assassination. and so there's no reason to believe its claims to the contrary. in this case, present the u. s. at an idea of what's going on, especially after the 2 geena assassination. certainly, it's a good chance that the ukraine has agents, you know, operating quite widely, engaged in all kinds of highly provocative, highly dangerous activities. and the usaa probably has no idea of what's going on, but is probably giving them some kind of license to kill the u. s. should have known better after the reactive case. it should have kept closer tabs on the, the s b u, trend intelligence. and either it was incompetent and darrow elected and did not keep closer tabs or it has a fair idea of what's going on. and i suspect the latter. and that