bosnic and daniel wright. >> hi, my name is daniel wright and i live two houses to the east of the subject property. my participation started during the pre-application meeting. in my view of the design has been a moving target expanding and hitting along a for seeable path with limited explanations for the changes as the dr requestor elevated. the major design changes to the house along with the interpretations of the residential guidelines, things were overlooked. the first -- the pre-application plan and we had issues with the plan, it addressed regulatory issues since there was a strong influence on this project if the -- it's in response to the emergency requirements and earthquake look. subsequent changes to the project on the 3-11 submission do not take into account the existing bedroom requires emergency access. the bedroom requires a window of the secretary size and access to a minimum of three foot by ten and neither which is shown. after incorporating the light well, the next part of the requirement is disruptive to the envelope. the building code requires direct access to a pub