daniel roe of hammond medicine which is a third party can discuss the human exposure to radiofrequency. the highest exposure levels that would result from this installation were 2.5% of the f.c.c.'s limit. 40 times below the limit. the exposure levels for anyone on the ground for folks walking by on the sidewalk is less than 1%. it's pretty clear that these levels are well below anything that would be beyond non-compliance with f.c.c.'s limits. barring any other evidence that these determinations were made in error, we respectfully request that this board deny the appeal and uphold the decision. >> what happened to the regular counsel? >> that was verizon's counsel. >> even though we've had quite a few of these cases before us, what is the overall reason of the upgrade on the antenna poles? >> upgrade? >> i mean, what is the purpose of the installation. >> oh, what are these for, why are we installing these? extenet is a provider. we work with all the major providers in the united states. we work with our clients to help them improve our wireless networks. as technology evolves, i'm su