so clearly you're a fan of danny canaman, so i assume you buy into behavioral economics, right? so that kind of cuts with, like, oh, human beings are rational. in fact, they definitely respect. and to me, there's kind of a parallel. i want to hear your opinion because to me right now we make very strong assumptions about a.i. and it's like, okay, if you have enough data and particularly if it's a vision problem or if it has particular correlations, then, boom, you're going to have really good precision recall, and you're going to have a magical black box. but i just -- my sense is that we are kind of in the rational world. like, these machines -- the assumption is -- we have these neural nets, and we have enough data and, boom, it'll work out. to me, it seems a lot like the classical economics like this is just going to work out, and i wondered what were your thoughts around maybe, you know, these neural nets only work a certain way because we have this magical vision data that happens to correlate are spatially, and things correlate spatially and it works properly. and what are