. >> legal analyst danny savalos from new york to talk about this. we saw the prosecution saying the circumstantial evidence is enough to prove aaron hernandez is a murderer. the defense has done its best to unravel all of that evidence. as an outsider, i would stay doesn't look good. where do you think this will if? >> reporter: first you see the prosecutor focusing on the strength strengt strengths and explaining that contrary to popular belief, circumstantial evidence can even be stronger than direct evidence. he is hammer that home. on the defense, it's interesting. you hear the defense focusing on motive. that may be their strongest argument. what was the motive to hurt the deceased person, the victim here. but what's interesting is that motive is not an element of any crime. it just happens that motive can be evidence of intent. where you don't have motive, many lawyers find it effective to argue to the jury why would somebody do this. what's interesting is that that is not an element of any of the crimes charged. >> where do you think this wil