more devices in every room of your home to collect that data but at the same time it's see also in darpa chuy's said the company was concerned about privacy as he took the stage at the company's annual developer conference in mountain view california to be unveiled some of google's latest hardware and software offerings including a new smart home hob with a camera speech i don't updates for google's a voice assistant and new privacy tools which he said would give people more control over how people track them. our mission now d.w. is washington bureau chief alexander phenomena joins us now from the iowa developer conference good to see you alexandra now you've been listening to the presentation there seem to be a thousand product updates what stood out for you. actually two things i would say first of all the advanced google lands in google search the tool is not only helping to search for thing stats you need but it also helping you place them in your place like for example when you're looking for shoes you can not only have a look at them but you can also place them in the your room to

day can be reloaded very quickly darpa tenchi extremely dangerous . i think if you asked people do you really need a semiautomatic rifle generally the answer is not especially in new zealand but do you want one and a lot of people say yes i do want one i want one because i enjoy going out and shooting targets i enjoy pulling the trigger you know neighbor tom apolo trigger the rifle actually goes off so i think it's just they're getting some sort of self-fulfillment toward enjoyment from actually shooting save your americans. davey himself is happy with a normal hunting rifle just under five million people live in new zealand and among them they own some one and a half million firearms the precise figures are known as up to now they didn't need to be registered and anyone with a gun license could buy as many weapons as they wanted the government wants to change all that but hundred saps that but he expects opposition from other weapon owners they're concerned about. they had their guns taken away from them or their guns not to see what americans were r

he spent years at darpa and is excited about the nexus between innovation and derisking and the kinds of problems that irene and i are dealing with all the time. i do think that the usual approaches are challenging. we did get congressional support for infectious disease rapid response we saw so many challenges with the lodge lag between emergency that we clearly have exceeded our funding capacities for, and that the resources from h 1 n 1 to ebola to zika. a very different issue is the innovation kind of investments. >> and here the funding to the security sector would bring uncapped capacities for all the public health response because the prize of the fund and our response is supposed to be 1/5 of the warhead or something, so the level of not just the technology, the knowledge, the capacities, not just the funds from the security if this dialogue goes well is uncapped. >> the other thing i would adjust very briefly is i think there's also been a lot of interesting movement bringing the matching of the private sector investments in this space and i think there's a whole lot more we

or encryption but that didn't stop people from using it for all sorts of crazy things and when like darpa which is the defense advanced research projects agency realized that you know the un encrypt internet wasn't particularly sort of good for the world good for them they forked the internet to the sort of military internet called arpanet which had encrypted years later like a decade later we added encryption to the internet t.o.s. but like defend our transactions like anyone in the world just couldn't see them but the problem is that even with that basically any sort of outside observer anyone who's like watching the internet which could be the n.s.a. could be the cia could be a government could be a well funded company if you're into big corn it could be chain analysis they can just watch the network level transactions who's sending a packet to who and they can use that to figure out who's top. to who and then they can d.n.r. mys them figure out who they are what they're doing and do whatever they want to do with them right now i've heard of tor i think i've used or once or twice so wh

take the internet for example, that comes out of darpa, military public r&d these countries spend a lotd. they spend a lot of money on industrial policy. one of the reasons why they have relatively high levels of innovation. charles: getting a wrap signal. how do we pay for socialism at least to get off the ground? all the things promised seem like they need massive economic injections to get started in? >> well, i mean it depends what we're talking about in particular. talk about how do we pay for "medicare for all" -- charles: pay all the college debt, pay for medicare all, take everyone off private insurance overnight, all those things, would costs trillions of dollars out the gate. >> sure, "medicare for all," to take one, for example, we spend enough in the current system to provide health care for everyone, you about spend it through private premiums replace it through taxes you get the bill down covering everyone. matter shifting where the money flows through private companies or government, not increasing total amount of expenditure. charles: matt, thank you very much. appreciat

agencies like the national science foundation and darpa should start now. anshould look at launching initiative similar to what the --has that leverages 30 billions of euros in investment. this initiative was the fuel that organized europe in a coherent direction and ultimately defined what 5g is today. the u.s. should lots a similar initiative focused on 6g and if we don't do so in the next couple of years, china will. and iyou for listening look forward to answering your questions. >> thank you for the opportunity to testify today. i am privileged to be here on such a distinguished panel. i have submitted a written statement for the record. rather than simply summarizing that statement, i thought i would use my introductory remarks to make a couple of discrete comments on issues raised during the first panel earlier this morning. , as i think came out in the first panel the success for , the united states in the race to 5g will depend ultimately primarily on the investments we make here in the united states. as my colleagues on this panel have stated, it

as deputy director of the technology office of defense research projects agency otherwise known as darpa, she also served two roles of the faa, one as senior technical advisor in field operations for the faa office of commercial space transformation and the other is acting deputy associate of the faa, prior to that she also worked as deputy program manager as space x perspiration and manages, shows a masters of arts degree in physics and astronomy in a masters of science degree in earth and planetary sciences from the massachusetts institute of technology. she graduated in 1985 from undergraduate pilot training at the air force base in lubbock texas writings i will start with the testimony. >> thank you. members of the committee, it's an honor to be here representing 17000 employees of nasa all across the united states of america and i tell you, we as an agency are very excited about our new direction to land the next man in the first woman on the south pole of the moon within five years. given the title of this hearing, i thought i would talk about how nasa plays in our national securit

darpa did a study called catcher's mitt, which said that the other thing that could be done is that there are some few dozen very large objects -- there are actually upper stages that have been left in orbit, and they are the most massive objects. and so they have the greatest potential to create a huge amount of debris. so there are policy issues that we have not discussed around third-party liability. the key one being if you go to grab a hold of a piece of debris and, oops, something doesn't go well, more debris is generated. >> right. >> there's a liability issue associated with that. one of the opportunities that i think the u.s. has to show leadership on this topic is to accept that the u.s. has liability under the outer space treaty and go and clean up our upper stages or at least a handful of them. it would have a huge impact on preventing something like the kessler syndrome. the other comment that i would make about the kessler syndrome is our earth is astounding in its ability to heal itself, and eventually if we follow debris mitigation standards, eventually objects in low-eart

appointed as the office director of the defense advance research project agency more commonly known as darpa. he served as texas a&m health science center. as a pediatric care physician he cared for critically ill children for 14 years. he don't bring the that hands on patient centered perspective to his work as assistant secretary of health where his primary goal is leading americans to live healthier lives. without further ado please join me welcoming my friend and constituent, admiral brett gerard. >> thank you very much, congressman flores and it's really a privilege and an honor to be back here. i waited about four years to start a speech this way. so i'll do it. howdy. love to hear that. i want to congratulate everyone for the tremendous work. i was able to read a pre-publication copy of the white paper and i think it's absolutely a critical piece of work that will serve as a guide post both nationally and internationally and i've geared a lot of my remarks based on that. looking back, i've been beating on this rob for about 25 years. in 1993 as an assistant professor my first grand ro