this is a former fellow at darpa. so the documents are 100% authentic. marine corps major who wrote them, but there really is an inconsistency here, and now we've had members of congress, also united states senator ron johnson has written a letter to department of defense, so a lot of questions remain unanswered, and project veritas is going to be doing more reporting on this. the marine corps major who gave us this statement -- again, the marine corps major was not the source of these documents, but he authored them -- he has said there are more people on the inside that are going to be coming out. and, of course, maria, there's nowhere else for these people to go. they can't go to the washington post, they can't go to any of the large media corporations because they're just busy defending fauci. really one of the only places they can go is to veritas tips.com, and that's how we got the information. maria: well, we have been reporting as well on the administering's really censoring of -- administration's really censoring of important drugs to treat covi

so darpa, for example, which i mentioned invested in the internet, darpa�*s quite famous for actuallypublic problems. the way that they�*ve actually organised their own institution is by welcoming risk—taking and experimentation, which you talked about, because civil servants make mistakes. but it�*s interesting how we reward risk—taking in the private sector. we allow the venture capitalists to brag about it, but as soon as a civil servant makes a mistake, front page of the newspaper. so the question you�*re asking is not onejust about long—termism in the public sector, but also, what is the human—resource strategy that we actually need within the civil service that allows both long—termism, but also the welcoming of that kind of experimentation and trial and error and error and error, cos you won�*t learn how to ride a bike without falling off. if we don�*t allow those kinds ofjob structures and culture of experimentation inside the state, none of these missions will work. right, and to return to the little phrase i used at the beginning about earthly reality perhaps clashing with s

. where — are you mentioned, who darpa ——, and harmonica, where these _ are you mentioned, who darpacalled anti—conversion laws, are aimed at christians, _ so—called anti—conversion laws, are aimed at christians, in— so—called anti—conversion laws, are aimed at christians, in other- so—called anti—conversion laws, are aimed at christians, in other words| aimed at christians, in other words it's a _ aimed at christians, in other words it's a matter— aimed at christians, in other words it's a matter of— aimed at christians, in other words it's a matter of containment, - aimed at christians, in other words it's a matter of containment, is - aimed at christians, in other words it's a matter of containment, is a l it's a matter of containment, is a matter of— it's a matter of containment, is a matter of intimidation— it's a matter of containment, is a matter of intimidation and - it's a matter of containment, is a matter of intimidation and that's| matter of intimidation and that's exactly— matter of intimidation and that's exactly what _ matter of intimidation and that's exactiy what is

the stay proposal rejected by darpa this potential was not rejected by niaid under your leadership. it's research that deflates that the wuhan institute. why did you tell the committee that they have never funded data research and why did you agency award this grant despite it ain't rejected by darpa due to concerns about violating the moratorium that was in place quickly commit to read all records fully and redacted by the end of this week so the american people can know the truth about nih's role in the origins of covid-19? >> again senator it pains me to have to point out to the american public how absolutely incorrect you are. what came out last night on project veritas was a grant that was submitted to darpa and then it distorted it and said we funded the grant. we have never seen that grant and we have never funded that grant so once again you are completely and unequivocally incorrect when you join the darpa proposal which was a a grant whenever someone we did not fund. so you are incorrect. >> social media will have all the supporting documents as well. >> you are backing do

that's a direct quote from the darpa rejection letter. the same rejection from darpa was not rejected but under niaid, it's research that took place at the wuhan institute of virology. why did you tell the company that your agency has not gained research? why did you violate the moratorium that was in place? and finally, will you commit today to release all records fully unredacted by the end of this week so congress and the american people can know the truth about nih's role and the origins of covid-19? >> again, senator, it really pains me to have to point out to the american public how absolutely incorrect you are. what came out last night on project veri toss was a grant that was submitted to darpa. then it distorted and said, we funded the grant. we have never seen that grant, and we have never funded that grant. so once again, you are completely and unquivocally incorrect. when we joined the darpa proposal, it was a grant we never saw and didn't fund, so you are incorrect. >> our social media will have all the supporting documents a

looks like the pentagon's darpa, to try to get darpa information on trump and russia.re basically breaking in and accessing data you shouldn't be, that is dangerous stuff. that sounds like criminality there. >> well, you know there is all these different buckets starting to get exposed in terms of where durham is going. misuse of important classified technology. the point is how far does it go into the clinton campaign to knowingly plant false information with the russian dossier. go back to the pleading for a second. one thing really interesting, liz, durham has no friends in washington. this pleading talks about how the special counsel went to the inspector general and said i need all your information so i can comply with discovery. the inspector general, michael horowitz, said you got it all. it turns out it is not true. they held back on critical documents and critical items such as cell phones of the fbi general counsel who talked to sussman and the fact that sussman came in and had a conversation about the technological issues with the inspector general and the i

that's a direct quote from the darpa rejection letter. the same rejection from darpa was not rejected but under niaid, it's research that took place at the wuhan institute of virology. why did you tell the company that your agency has not gained research? why did you violate the moratorium that was in place? and finally, will you commit today to release all records fully unredacted by the end of this week so congress and the american people can know the truth about nih's role and the origins of covid-19? >> again, senator, it really pains me to have to point out to the american public how absolutely incorrect you are. what came out last night on project veri toss was a grant that was submitted to darpa. then it distorted and said, we funded the grant. we have never seen that grant, and we have never funded that grant. so once again, you are completely and unquivocally incorrect. when we joined the darpa proposal, it was a grant we never saw and didn't fund, so you are incorrect. >> our social media will have all the supporting documents a

previously we announced collaboration and partnerships with the nih, darpa, and it has shown crispr cane-to-toe with gold standard technologies in the diagnostic space like pcr and offers the potential of revolutionizing the spectrum of testing for infectious diseases, starting with covid-19 and beyond, whether that is in the lab, the doctor's office, or at home. emily: we just got a historic verdict in the case of elizabeth holmes, given that she was a young, then up and coming ceo and founder in biosciences. i am curious what impact she has had on the work you do and are trying to do and if you have any thoughts on it. trevor: at mammoth we like to lead with science. we have published many papers in top scientific journals and are excited to explain to people how we use crispr across therapeutics and diagnostics. it reinforces the importance of being transparent and getting people excited about the technology and helping them understand what it can and can't do. it reinforces that for us. emily: trevor martin, ceo of mammoth biosciences. coming up, how to bridge the skills gap. one te

we're talking more than 133,000 documents, grand jury impaneled for the clinton team, fbi, cia, darpaemails involving hillary clinton campaign and the law firm itself. is this looking like this could be building into another case? >> it does. it has been pretty quiet out in the media over the durham investigation which might lead people to think it's over but this filing shows that he is very quietly moving ahead and it is obvious from the documents that they're trying to get, from the hillary campaign, that they are exploring who at the hillary campaign knew and was involved in creating the false steele dossier. i'm sure they want to know who was involved in creating it, who knew about the fabrication when they were giving it to the fbi, all of which could spell trouble for the people in the campaign. elizabeth: yeah. also, he disclosed there is an active ongoing criminal investigation into hillary's campaign lawyer michael sussman. there is an active ongoing criminal investigation, more than just him being charged with lying to the fbi. he has denied that this is about durham possib

>> ...and the doctor he was under was a head air force mind control doctor, and he was involved in darpand told people he was under mind control in the jail. >> he just kept adding more and more and more outrageous lies to the story. all the pictures of the children inside of it were fake. it was all a cgi construction. for jones, it didn't matter how absurd each new layer got. he would put anything on the air, as long as it kept driving the sandy hook story. >> newtown destroys suspected sandy hook shooter's home... >> narrator: even inside infowars, some of jones' own staff worried about what he was saying. >> but the media still lies and says he did. >> jones had no evidence whatsoever to prove that that didn't happen. and he said it many times because that's just what fit into his worldview. that's what, i mean, on some level it feel like that's what he wanted it to be. >> narrator: one of jones' employees, longtime editor rob jacobson, brought his concerns directly to jones. >> i stopped him. i was like, "alex, man, they're going to come after you for sandy hook," you know? i was li

i remember a darpa autonomous vehicle. they were running into each other. what a difference.. that is cool. >> john: that is crazy. >> sandra: what is crazy? elmo. when folks think about the fuzzy red monster from sesame street, words come up like cute or cuddly. almost never unhinged. that was the case after a resuffersed clip from the street went viral from back in 2004. in it, elmo wants an oatmeal raisin cookie. delicious. his friend, zoey chose to give to it a pet rock. >> wait. wait. roscoe says he wants the cookie. >> roscoe? that's a rock. you know the difference? >> you can't have that cookie, elmo. rocco wants to eat it. >> how is rocco going to eat the cookie? rocco doesn't have a mouth. rocco is a rock. >> sandra: i have never seen elmo like that before. that clip set social media ablaze. elmo's reps tweeted that elmo still shares and they're best beds. i make oatmeal raisin over the holidays. they're the best. i would always give them to you, not a pet rock. >> john: looks like elmo was channelling our twins. >> sandra: nice. great to be with you all week. i'll s

for god sakes, you got darpa, the pentagon, they got robot dogs out there trying to figure out how toiffuse minds yet dod second's -- some of these are guys on typewriters. it sounds like a joke. what it reflects is this, priority. the men and women who served are the greatest asset of the united states military. and yet, they are the lowest on the totem pole when comes to resources. we always have money for the technology, the defense contractors, with sovereign immunity for the defense contractors. we balance the budget on the backs of those who come home and try to reintegrate. that is the changing culture that has to take place. i know i'm talking to the via sews and their representatives are gone, it is crazy we are having this meeting. i'm thankful it is getting done, this has to get done and has to get done with common sense and intentionality. thank you very much for having us -- having this, it is much appreciated. >> thank you mr. stewart. you point out the stark contradictions. i want to echo some of what the doctor said earlier. it echoes what ms. keenan said about the con

editorial board asked about peter dazig, they asked, why did he not disclose the 2018 proposal to darpa for researched on bat coronaviruses with the w.i.b. and other which is called for engineering a modification onto spike proteins of chimeric viruses to make them infect human cells the way the pandemic did? what does he know about the database of viruses taken offline in 2019 and never brought back? does he know what research the w.i.b. may have done on its own during or after their collaboration? what was being done at the w.i.b. in the months before the pandemic? mr. dazig must answer these questions before congress. his grants were federal funds and it's entirely appropriate for congress to insist on accountability and transparency. he might help the world understand what really happened in wuhan. these are good questions and comments from "the washington post." i suggest that this committee should be investigating and holding hearings on the origins of covid-19 and any coverups. and do so in coordination with our intelligence community. my only question, can i get that commitment

they and why did he not disclose his 2018 proposal to darpa for research on bat coronaviruses with the wiv andnd others which calledin for engineering and modification on to spike proteins of chimera viruses that would make them infect human cellsus in the way the pandemic strain did. what does he know about the databases off viruss that the wv took off line in 2019 and never broughtt back? does he know what research the done on its own during or after their collaboration? what was being done at wiv in the months before the pandemic. mr. dasic must answer these questions before congress. his grants were federal funds and it isis entirely appropriat for congress to insist on accountability and transparency. he mightug help the world understand what really happened in wuhan. these with good questions and comments from the "washington post." i suggestn thatti this committ should be investigating and holding hearings on the origins of covid-19 and any cover ups andma do so in coordination wit our intelligence community. my onlial question, can i get that commitment from our chairman and fr