project veritas. >> what came out last night on project veritas was a grant that was submitted to darpat's going on inside and you're going to ask me, how do we do that? i'm giving you a road map. the book talks about it, it's about getting people inside to come public, which is a really hard thing to do, requires sacrifice, requires pain, requires perseverance and you know, and also the first chapter in the book is called suffering. you might say why did you write a chapter about that? well, i'm glad you asked. three months ago the fbi came to my house. this is the second time in my life that the fbi has put me in handcuffs. and i'm a journalist. i may be the only man you'll ever know who is not a gangster or a mobster or a terrorist who has had this happen to him on multiple occasions, it happened in 2010 in new orleans and i wrote other book about that, and i was innocent, but i was falsely accused, incarcerated put on probation and eventually i got a misdemeanor in new orleans i was showing up asking questions and then last year, or the year before-- about a year and a half ago or s

it would be a great podcast but here's what he had to say about this anthony fauci darpa stuff. of the decree that they are credible. by virtue of their own decree so it's really a self-anointed racket. i'm not going to trust that video because of that veritas guy. it's not me, are you saying the documents are fake? but this is what they do. that's the propaganda. they ask you to trust the new york times and washington post by virtue of the degree they are credible because they say so and they never show you any evidence. that tax return story which was a new york times bombshell that was coincided with our minnesota story, they didn't show you any on the record sources, they didn't show you any video. they didn't even show you any documents but theyask you to trust them. and we have no reason to trust them . we have no reason to trust the media says joe rogan. >> we had joe o'keefe from project veritas. he's a bogeyman to the last, he's exposing threats to democracy, real life corruption. he's exposing real life conspiracies and their like no, but it's veritas. even if what he'

and in these documents you had revelations about gain of function research that was approached to darpa was approached by equal health alliance to do research on bat-born coronaviruses, and it was rejected. because it was too dangerous according to the department of defense documents also say that anthony fauci was approached and approved it under his leadership at ni aid these documents are accurate. that would mean that anthony fauci lied under oath. and this was authored by a marine corps major named joseph murphy at the department of defense. he was not the source of the documents to us, but he did author them and he actually issued a statement to me when i when i when we approached him for comment and listened to what this marine corps major who wrote these documents again, not the source of the information listen to what he said to us james o'keefe asked this person, you know, would you like to make a comment about this video and here is what this marine said. i offer no comments on the investigation or internal marine corps deliberations. i offer a brief comment to those that des

he ran cybersecurity grantmaking at darpa ended did special projects at google. way back in the day he was a member of a pioneer hyperspace called the loft -- hacker space called the left. he testified before congress telling them how insecure the internet was and now they can bring the whole thing in about a half an hour's work. this is why jack dorsey brought him into twitter after yet another long string of embarrassing hacks in 2020. kristen: so he brought him in, allegedly to take note of any flaws and call him out and help them fix it. but what happened? what did he notice and what did he do and what happened to him? >> well, he was given a lot of responsibility, but not the actual power. that's because according to the complaint, jack dorsey was pretty absent. even when he was present, he was not fully present. in the course of an entire year, per the complaint, dorsey said about 50 words to mudge, half a dozen phone calls, with a couple dozen text messages, and that is it. the way twitter is structured, people need buy-in from other executives and other d

that we do not have time to work according to the old procedures, we need to create something like darpa, where the state just spends a lot of money on testing concepts and then very quickly it is on the training grounds there with the military, it works right away and we have a general idea to build this defense defense class innovative defense cluster so that we have the opportunity in any project to provide assistance there from the idea stage to stage when it is necessary to put it into service. for example , as part of the initiative, we want to start the accelerator of defense technologies, that is, if you have already working projects, you want to arrange something. military from the state in order to quickly go through all all the procedures, uh, there is also the idea of ​​creating a special fund to finance such defense projects, and we want to close such a cycle so that in fact the majority of the majority of the project will be produced in ukraine. thank you, mr. oleksandr oleksandr bornyakov deputy minister of digital transformation for development it worked live on the espre

they were very much funded by darpa and defense funding agency. right. so it's not because they're interested in, on accessibility for, for disabled people, right? if they're interested primarily and autonomous warfare. so how can we assume that something that starts with that all and that funding insight will end up being something different. and so i often give this example, you know, when people talk about air for social good, right? they talk about kind of reorienting, some of these things that we already built for clinical social good. whereas for me, it's kind of saying that, ok, we build this tang 1st and then we try to figure out how to use this bank for something other than warfare. maybe we can use it for farming. maybe we can use it for something else. but the thing is, we already made the tank right. we designed the systems so that they become at tank like 1st a specific goal and outcome which is warfare. so that's exactly how we've been designing our technological systems. if you look at the history of a i, when it's funded by the government

he's worked for department of defense, darpa, head of google, his background is one of the best in cybersecurityhe's known for being one of the top cybersecurity professionals and notably ethical throughout his entire career. coming from him, we take notice and look at this and say, okay, what's going on here? it looked like they were inflating the numbers that the alga rhythms they use to determine the bot numbers were also basically designed to show a lower percentage and that was well known throughout the leadership team. that's the first part and now you have all these security concerns and vulnerabilities within twitter that was explaining to peter, do not actually commune kit that to the board. hide the -- communicate to the boards and hide the findings and make us look better in front of the board and we don't want to look bad with all the security issues and that's a big red flag. kennedy: yeah, two things going on. spam and bot accounts and the executives like it and the more people using the platform, the more they make. nay have no incentive to be honest about that . the structural is

to us in these documents, you have revelations about gain of function research that was approached, darpas approached by eco-health alliance to do research on bat born coronavirus is and was rejected because it was too dangerous according to the department of defense, documents say that anthony fauci was approached and approved under his leadership. these documents are accurate that would mean anthony fauci lied under oath. this was offered by a green core major named joseph murphy at the permit of defense, he was not the source of the document but did arthur them and actually issued a statement to me when we approached him for comment, listen to what this marine corps major who wrote these documents, not the source of the information, listen to what he said to us. >> james o'keefe asked this person would you like to make a comment about this video and here's what this marine said. >> i offer no comment on the investigation on marine corps deliberations lose for a brief comment to those who desire answers, to those seeking answers i offer encouragement. there are good people striving for

he was a senior position at darpa, led oh fernsive and defensive cyber operations research and endedbefore twitter. this guy know what's he's talking about. >> martha: we have a flashback from the testimony on your screen now. he's worked for the government, recognized expert in this feel. here's a flashback from many years ago when he was on to the fact that there was a big security concern in all of this. >> if you have a person that is a pick pocket and they steal two cents from a person and on average they get one out of ever 1,000 people that goes by them they get two cents. they will starve in the real world. but in the internet community, this is viable. >> martha: now he has come forward and basically he's saying that twitter is not a secure place. he is suggesting that it's a national security risk the way that this business is run. can you explain that for us, john? >> absolutely. so mudge was incharge of privacy information security, physical security and content scale at the company. one of the top executives. he worked hard on privacy engineering. another thing was block

the things that can't be done by the private sector, harder to tackle, we take those on whether at darpadepartment of energy or other places. there's a lot of technology, this great report that ernie and bill gates wrote a couple years ago, the next energy cites technology developments that will happen and how we can take advantage of them. >> senator cantwell, thanks for your time today. great to have you. >> thank you >>> joining me from capitol hill >>> still ahead, take two's net loss and nvidia's revenue warning weighing on both as the two companies point to a slowdown in the gaming sector post-pandemic. is microsoft acquisition of activism starting to look like a bad bet? consumer confidence in the wes ing market falling it to lost point in a decade as lending names scramble and consolidation looms, possible winners and losers stay with us. at fidelity, your dedicated advisor will work with you on a comprehensive wealth plan across your full financial picture. a plan with tax-smart investing strategies designed to help you keep more of what you earn. this is the planning effect. ♪

. >> in 2018, they asked for money from darpa. they wanted to insert the nucleotide that makes it highly infectious in humans. they had the idea and must've thought wow, this is going to be a great experiment. even our government decided at that point not to fund that. this is why i think it was a holy cow moment when all of a sudden, the scientists see the sequence of covid-19 and go, didn't they access -- ask us in 2018 to put that nucleotide in? dr. quay, could you lay out in a simple a fashion as possible, two or three items about the virus that makes you think, whether this came from a lab or animals, but compelling evidence suggests it could have come from a lab. even if it was a 10% chance, it is another reason to be concerned about having oversight on this kind of research. can you give me two or three things this virus has that makes you think it is lab, versus the evidence for mers and sars that it came from animals? >> the receptor binding, a binding site, with respect to receptor-binding domain, if you look at sars one