data to life.e behind them is the data car, where the team analyst is dissecting the data and feeding them live information. as to what happens in here, it is quite an important place, isn't it? imagine if you have a comms office and you try to fire a rocket to the moon, and i just feel like we are that place at nasa where all the details come in. and they come in from all directions. and then we send out one message to the riders. hundreds of data sets are analysed, from competitor tactics to live course conditions. we analyse all of the climbs, the gradients, the road surfaces, the width of roads. any road furniture, anything coming around a blind corner and there is a pedestrian crossing. all these kinds of things, we try to find. 0n the tour de france, with restrictions on sponsorship deals, we don't get any heartrate or power data, but we do get location, which is absolutely crucial because we can make decisions much, much quicker. so we are in the race. this is happening live. what are we say

it is part of their social or and thesponsibility data age to treat data and the individual whose data it is fairly and humanely and with dignity. -- iply see it it is simply see it as a cost of doing business. i don't think it is outside in relationship to the risk opposes and the harm it poses to the individuals whose data is being used. when me gdpr could -- when the gdpr could get expensive is the way the penalties are used. if that is applied by european against a small company who is in violation of some aspect of the gdpr, that can be expensive. it is my -- if my view in my ascension the it is not a what the european regulators are going to try to do, so i think -- i think they are going to do what they should do. mean is i what i think their main goal is to protect privacy. i don't think they see their main goal is going out and levying fines on companies. but, the potential penalty on the gdp are --gdpr is high. if there is a company that runs a foul of that, that will be expensive. , the victoria espinel software alliance chief executive and resident, -- president, former rep

>> with the data yes but it has been. if anybody is surprised they haven't been paying attention because positive or negative depending on your viewpoint is a logical extraction from the 1990s and 80s it is formalizing what europe has been doing on privacy and meeting frankly the global dialogue where we need to go with harmonization and mutual recognition. but right now absent other regional leadership the eu occupies this field for compliance for multinational companies. >>host: what is the general data protection regulations do? >> first of all that formulate formulated -- formalizes what was in place with european member countries in one law and it says individuals have interest and control in their data held by companies that affects any company in a way that affects the data located in europe and comes with significant findings. i have been working on privacy for a long time there are many issues of compliance and how to implement them and people understand is expected of them. i think most regulators are working be

i see a consistent set of rules on data and data moving around the world as absolutely essential for all the emerging technology that we work on including artificial intelligence. i see that as a core underpinning of that. having a harmonized privacy system. i think if we want all the innovation that the united states is so good at, and has done so much for the world, if we wanted to move forward in a positive way, then we need to have the right rules underneath that. we need to have the right legal underpinnings. getting to a consensus on privacy is part of that. i will pause for a moment. i'm hoping nuala will take up what you were saying before. i think that is an important part of this. privacy is not just this issue in a silo. privacy and privacy rules have big impacts on technology and how it is developed. i think that is an important part of this broader conversation. nuala: privacy and data protection norms have an impact on how companies constructs -- construct themselves. i want to follow up on the global construct which is, we are still in search of the holy grail of where

his or her data and the person has ongoing rights even the data is used legitimate by good corporate actors and that's a conversation every company needs to have. >> who do you represent at the center for democracy and technology? >> the rights of individual, we are funded by foundations, companies, individuals, all interested parties in a highly diversified portfolio but our stance has always been the rights of the individual, the human right, human dignity it's something that needs and deserves to be protected around the world. >> what's a legitimate right of a company using somebody's data? >> i will give you an example i gave even before i worked at amazon, listen, you want to buy a book from amazon, they have to know your home address to deliver the book, right, that's legitimate interest. they may want to send you ads on the homepage of the website to tell you about other books that you might be interested in. those are primary purpose uses by the company, where people start to lose trust in company use is when they are selling data, when they are transferring it beyond the ori

you put the world into three types of data. data1.0, 2.0 and data 3.0 . why do you talk a little bit about how you organized this so people can approach it and i hope everybody will take this home and spend sometime with it . >> i was trying in part to describe the fact that the technology really outstrips the architecture of our laws and policies and there comes a point where you can't shove it into the old architecture anymore. you've got to say we've got to go back to the drawing board and i thought about when has this happened before and i went back to the founding of the country and back even before that to england, back in the last millennium when we first began to have a right to privacy which really became the fourth amendment and it was all about property, about every person's home is their castle and all the discussion about your right to privacy is about who could come into your house, take your stuff and look at it . but that's where i call one point now, the way we generated data was we talked, we wrote things down on paper. that was basicall

cost in nola is a data security expert and consultant he views the global market in data critically . it's a huge business which benefits only a few. who has revenue of more than one hundred billion dollars a year from advertising the companies running those ads have to take in those hundred billion to pay for the ads so they add a certain amount to the products they sell so a single company is earning hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year on each new. housing. data wall that turns the tables on the online giants paid plans to have its clients manage their data via its website and earn a share if and when the data are sold. data while it is a small start up so facebook and google probably don't yet feel threatened still its agenda should alarm the big boys. we basically allow people to take all of the data they create all over the internet over of the hundreds of different platforms that they use put it into one profile and based upon expressive consent shared with the companies who didn't work the share this data with so if you have your you know data set you can sell it to on

data 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0.why don't you talk a little bit about how you organize this so people can approach it and why i hope everybody is going to take this home and spend some time with it. >> with the cia was trying in part to describe the fact that technology has stripped the architecture of the law and policy and there comes a point you can't anymore. we have to go back to the drawing board. and as i thought about it, i thought wayne has this happened before and i went back to the founding of the country and back even before that to england back in the last millennium when we begin to have a right to privacy and it was all about property, every person's home in newcastle and all the discussion about the right to privacy those who can come to your house and take your stuff and look at it. that's what i call 1.0. we generate the data by talking, wrote things down on paper. that was basically it. then in the 19th century you wind up with photography and telephony. for the first time we were generating data n

data protection regulation the users remain owners of their own data so shouldn't they also benefit financially if social media and internet firms make money with it the american german start of data wall that has developed technology that lets internet users keep their data private and helps them to earn when the data is being used five to ten years down the road back onto this as like dark ages of data where we have no control and basically anybody could claim ownership of our data and we have no way to interfere right and i think that data in the future will be one of the most important assets for people to own and will be one of the most substantial revenue streams for data to be able to monetize a little. while the rules in the e.u. are now very tough in many countries d.d. hughes and ownership are still un break elated data wallet which is currently in the beta phase says it lets users determine themselves who can use their data. social media companies gather likes comments and status reports and use them to infer emotional states and attitudes photos that people upload are an

i went on-line for some data. we ha we have over 4600 staff members, yet only 1,000 people have been trained in safety care, and only 310 have been trained in implicit bias. that's 6.7% of our staff, and we wonder why 40% of the office discipline referrals are for disruption? direct correlation. we need to do more around implicit bias. >> so my name is allison collins, and i'm so glad that lee said that because i'm looking at the same numbers, and i guess i just want to add onto that. at my daughter's school, there was a lot of -- i think at the school last year, we were the highest in suspensions for african american students in the district. we had several lockdowns, and we also had the police called on students to take them out of the school. this year has been a complete turnaround because we have a principal who's worked very hard to build relationships with staff and families and has also supported the staff in coming up with behavior plans that are consistent across the school. so it's been basically night

very me provides users with an overview of how their data is being used by clients. in the syria i think it's great that vera me makes user privacy our priority but we're centralized data collection there is always the problem that a. very lucrative for a hacker. for example would happen to earth identity or stolen. identity theft can have terrible consequences for example online purchases can be made under someone else's name the more data stolen the greater the damage the companies that cooperate with very many benefits from centralized data collection. companies such as telecom. are outsourcing responsibility for their data but they can be certain that users of bury me are authenticated. unlike with social law against sitting them a star not permitted. for online security expert. this also has disadvantages the c.e.o. until now using a pseudonym was one of the biggest man. because of going online where you could be who you wanted to be and get information about things that you know maybe would not dare to research on or watch. if we have to identify ourselves thro

of data.we have the ability to use very fast computers, to be able to look at someone who has been injured within hours and decide what to do for something that, you know, even just a few years they perhaps couldn't be helped because by the time the information went through the computer they were either too far gone or couldn't be helped. so there's a lot of good things about data but at the same time there's the whole now weaponization. you talk about news, talk about that. >> we had discussion about what used to be quote information operation or active measures by the russians or other countries as well as that use variations of this and this is the use of media in order to propagate stories that are exaggerated or false or one side in order to drive behavior, social discord and even hatred, now, i have to say in preface this idea is not new, if you go backs 00 years to the common turn when soviet union existed, they had propaganda machine, they were not particularly skilled but the idea of

possible data misuse. but here is a new problem. the global nature of the internet means that the impact and power goes beyond a jurisdictions borders. u.s. companies are compelled to change business models or alter operations to achieve compliance with in the market and they are experiencing disruptions in their own domestic obligations as well. the result is less job creation, both investment and innovation in the united states. consumers are feeling the effect effects of the international policies also. overly restrictive limitations of the data movement were inconsistencies across the jurisdictions ultimately deliver an internet experience to consumers but it's less personalized and more expensive to access. today we look forward to examining the impact of the global internet policies and u.s. businesses and consumers as well as the continued development of the internet around the world. i would mention that i'm the chairman of the helsinki commission in a par and is a pae commission's mission, we prom

i don't believe we can currently control where our data is. there or may we save all that here in europe ended. with data protection regulation facebook and google it's all sent to america very me users can decide which information is collected by online platforms they can also determine who has access to their data very me provides users with an overview of how their data is being used by clients. in the syria i think it's great that vera me makes user privacy a priority but with centralized data collection there is always the problem that a dumpling be very lucrative for a hacker. for example what would happen there if my identity were stolen. identity theft can have terrible consequences for example online purchases can be made under someone else's name the more data stolen the greater the damage the companies that cooperate with very many benefit from centralized data collection. companies such as. are outsourcing responsibility for their data but they can be certain that users of very me are authenticated. unlike with social logons sit in

data driven and so in toll the democratic side figures out to look at the data hillary spent billions on data and famously chose to ignore it she thought her instincts were better than the data and that's why she lost we'll get into that another episode but i do want to mention that the democrats are the ones that enabled all of that enabled google and facebook to capture such a large share and not basically break them up via anti-monopoly anti-trust laws so they're the ones that allow them to collect so much data and yet that's part of the reason why i think they have this sort of mental breakdown where they have become the republicans of the one nine hundred fifty s. and now in fact what the data the actual results of twenty sixteen show is that america's three towns once solidly blue are now a g.o.p. haven a generation ago democrats represent and much of the country's manufacturing base now it is in g.o.p. hands a swing remaking both parties the republican party has become the party of blue collar america this is from the wall street journal and they say after the one nine hundred

data they don't even need for marketing. in practice i think companies would be hard pressed to divide up information they collect between the data the do and don't mean i'd say it's easier for them to just collect all the data. and however cautious jessica unmocked used to be while surfing the net del inevitably be identified and then tracked around the world. now it's time for our video of the week sit back and enjoy your is well thank you. is the voice of the sun. here when it's vibrations. transposed into sound nasa and isa recorded those vibrations and turned a forty day sequence of them into music. literally so what's next the mood. state you. are in a scene eighty three thyroid tissue in one nine hundred sixty seven a heart organ transplantation has become an every day procedure well over one hundred thousand other forms each year you try and transplants are a new frontier for some women they offer hope but they're controversial. in twenty sixteen gynecologists out of pocket performed germany's first uterine transplan

when the data is being used. five to ten years down the road we'll look back onto this as like dark ages of data where we had no control and basically anybody could claim ownership of our data and we had no way to interfere right and i think that data in the future will be one of the most important assets for people to own and will be one of the most substantial revenue streams for data to be able to monetize a little. while the rules in the e.u. are now very tough in many countries d.d. hughson ownership are still unbreakable lated data wallet which is currently in the beta phase says it lets users determine themselves who can use their data. social media companies gather likes comments and status reports and use them to infer emotional states in attitude photos that people upload are another important source of data for them. online retailers monitor shopping habits and infer preferences and lifestyles registered users of dating sites and online forums also reveal a lot perhaps more than they realize retailers

of head of state has intimate data on the citizens of that country and that data is in the political wing of that person's operation. forget whether i like that candidate or president or not, this is an unhealthy situation in a democracy. nobody cared. we couldn't get anybody to write that story. nobody writing an op-ed about it. it wasn't interesting because the story was barack obama is digitally savvy. of course that was. that happened to cambridge analytica written by a bond villain that became a major international story and because it was working for ted cruz no one in texas likes, that helped and donald trump, 60%, 70% of the country didn't like and was working for the campaign in brexit, it was easy to say cambridge analytica is a bad actor, stealing data. when facebook made it seem they stole the data instead of facebook gave the data away and didn't care who will got it which was the case that is a long way of saying facebook now has to deal with a series of crises that strike at the core of its business and facebook would like you to believe and most importantly like senat

i want to master my data. i want to own my own a data data and my own creations. google has about 55% of all music revenues and music from market share. it only pays about 13% of all of the royalties. it's really the people that produce the content. and that model exploits that producers of the actual content. the foundation of a google's future. a smart business. and they've have it. they've enjoyed a huge bonanza. the second richest company in the company in the world by giving things away for free. but the model is coming to an end. one is based on big data. they really know that there is a fundamental flaw in the big data machine learning ai. the philosophy and the heart of the google business plan. they believe that human beings no longer head a real role in the world that they are creating. that ai and machine learning can mess up the human mind. they believe that their technology is the ultimate technology. i see this as a return of the old marxist policy. the industrial revolution with the turbines and the early industrial age was the productivity problem

hospital data being our own data source for that information. part of this analysis we though wanted to understand where our seniors and people with disabilities, where they live and where they're traveling. because from a proactive step, they're more exposed and vulnerable to injury. so we started with our internal short list but then we did a lot of outreach including through surveys to better understand where our locations of concern for seniors and people with disabilities are and that added notably public libraries to the list for attractors. it makes intuitive sense i think for a lot of our more vulnerable citizens in san francisco, that libraries are an important resource. and we got para-transit drop off and pickup locations from the sfmta and we're able to expand our priority areas to important locations for seniors. and so this is a map that we were able to create. on all of the segments that you see highlighted on the map that's where the seniors and people with disabilities -- it capture where is they were injured from 2014 to 20 sa

for the customer the important thing about data is also the data is empowering the algorithms and the machine learning and that means the artificial intelligence of the future because the technology that we have right now in intelligence is mainly based on data and that means that if you have the most the best data you would have better resumes and the future of solutions is deeply motivated by i deficient intelligence also collecting the data table data security is becoming an even bigger issue than isn't it for sure yes and in my opinion everybody coming to us should be aware of the fact is especially in the internet they are is no service for free if you are using search engines for example we are providing data so on the first glance it may be a free service for us but in the second or in the sort lens. this empowers these kind of companies in the internet to make their algorithms better and better and we are giving free information to them and help them through those now you mentioned artificial intelligence already hollows ai impacting our our lives nowadays already . so it's pr

ly say a quick thing about this trade data is that the trade data is really really good data, especially when it comes to goods because the way they compile it is that when you -- when an importer or an exporter ships goods in or out of the country, they actually register the dollar amount they have to do it at customs. so this data is based off adding all those things up. it is really -- it is like really complete administrative data. a lot of economic data is based off surveys, even some of the government surveys. it's kind of a dirty little secret, have really bad response rates now and the data is maybe not really very reliable anymore, but that's not the case with the trade data. it is still the registered amounts that are coming in every month. so it's still extremely reliable data. and the digit codes are literally the way these things are categorized when they come into the country. there's people whose whole job is to -- they are registered customs agents and their whole job is to know which code in certain products should go into and how to categorize it for custom purposes. it

>> we analyze anonymized patient data in partnership with nhs trust. that allows us to ask questions of the data to help companies how to improve lyrical trials, how to understand the complexity of medicine to be able to analyze digital patient records, to see the hidden patterns in that data. it leads to new discoveries to accelerate medical research. nejra: is this data and demand from pharmaceutical companies globally? >> yes. there is a growing recognition that the ability to get real-world evidence from digital patient records, once they have been anonymized, can be very useful in accelerating the

the gdpr is about data regulation, specifically 173 rules on data regulation. europe is the destination of two-thirds of america's digital goods and services, and juice companies are suffering because of its cost and complexity. i live in copenhagen so i can experience this. i can no longer look at a newspaper such as the "l.a. times," fisher "chicago tribune," the new daily news, the hartford courant or baltimore sun. additionally, 60 additional newspapers in illinois, indiana, minnesota, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, washington and wisconsin are not available. this reduction in content has reduced visibility for u.s. advertisers and to shut them out of independent ad exchanges. retailers williams and sonoma and pottery barn no longer sell in the eu. in companies from washington state that down the online communities. a nevada provider of i.t. service no longer take european customers. in mobile mercantile from company with six office in the united states as close its eu operations or even the website of the association of national advertisers is not av