davankov are two deputy chairmen of the state duma, it is absolutely clear that general aviation, smallly, today, to a huge unfortunately, we fly probably 10% of the capacity, i have said many times, and i do not hide it, and i am ready to say it, repeat it at any level, except for general phrases, we are talking about the mobilization resource of the country, generally speaking, people who know how to manage by plane, helicopter in any capacity, god forbid that this is a huge support , it should also be treated this way, and this cannot be done... in fact, this problem is huge, and the essence of this problem is that in general, in principle, today, dasav aviation, at one time, was probably the most large, we have 1,300 aircraft left now, and before that there were several thousand, it has completely fallen out of the legislative field , that is, it does not exist as such, today it is de facto, in principle it is doing well, but, unfortunately, the existing legislation simply does not see it, and here, we see the opposite example, this is how it should be, and how it should work, and i

davankov received such a letter from one region to vladislav, anton tkachev from another region , butce an accident, twice a coincidence, they came up with this initiative, now the heads of the administration are telling us, our residents , they like to be called there, sucker. here why does the head of administration decide this? the head of administration, if i’m not mistaken, of this very locality said that this is generally a tourist brand, people go there to take a photo with maybe it’s a brand, yes, but let’s ask the residents, so we’re not saying we’ll ban it, we’re saying let’s ask the residents, and if they decide, then we’ll rename it, you see the difference, but of course, some of the hot heads there today ostanina, nina are communists, because they don’t have it in their heads that people can vote, he says new people proposed a ban, but we suggested asking people to find out. and if they don’t like it, then rename it, there is a difference, you won’t withdraw it, after such a reaction , you won’t withdraw the initiative, you need to teach the communists what can not only b

but we can let people decide for themselves, because now what started, where did we start from, davankovanton takachev from another region, but it’s time they are not there right away, but one thing, once an accident, twice a coincidence , they came up with this initiative, now the heads of the administration are telling us, our residents, they like to be called there, sucker, that’s why the head of the administration decides this, the head of the administration, if not i’m wrong, he just said of this locality that it’s generally a tourist brand, they go there to take pictures with , maybe it’s a brand for him, maybe yes, but let’s ask the residents, so we don’t say, we’ll ban it, we say, let’s ask the residents, and if they decide, then we’ll rename it, you see the difference, but of course, some of the burning heads there today ostanina, nina are communists, because in their leadership there is no such thing that people can vote, she says, new people proposed a ban, but we proposed get to know people, and if they don’t like it, then rename it, there is a difference, you won’t revoke it

, but we can let people decide for themselves, because now what started, where did we come from, davankovme they are there right away, but then one, one time an accident, twice a coincidence, they came up with this initiative, now the heads of the administration are telling us: our residents like to be called suckers there, that’s why the head of the administration decides this, the head of the administration, if i’m not mistaken, said just this way that this is generally a tourist brand, they go there to take a photo with - maybe it’s a brand for him, maybe yes, but let’s ask the residents, so we’re not saying we’ll ban it, we’re saying, let’s ask the residents, and if they decide, we’ll rename it, you see the difference, that’s it, of course. some the hot heads there today ostanina, nina are communists, because in their leadership there is no such thing that people can vote, she says: new people proposed a ban, but we proposed to find out from people, and if they don’t like it, then rename it, there is a difference, you will not recall, after such a reaction, you will not withdraw the i

we can let people decide for themselves, because now it has begun, we where did they come from, davankovhev from another region, but in terms of time they were not there right away , but then one time an accident two times a coincidence, they came up with this initiative, now the heads of the administration are telling us that our residents... they like to be called suckers there , that’s why the head of the administration decides this, the head of the administration, if i’m not mistaken, of this particular locality said that this is generally a tourist brand, people go there to take pictures with, maybe it’s a brand for him, maybe yes, but let’s ask the residents, so we don’t we say, we’ll ban it, we say, let’s ask the residents, and if they decide, we’ll rename it, you see the difference, but of course, some of the hotheads there today are stalin, nina, communists, because they don’t have such a thing at the head that people can vote , she says: but people suggested banning it, but we suggested asking people, and if they don’t like it, then rename it, is there a difference? to revoke t

davankov, these are two deputy chairmen of the state duma, she is absolutely clear that general aviationapacity. i have said it many times and i do not hide it, and i am ready to say it, repeat it on at any level, except for the general ones... since we are talking about the mobilization resource of the country, generally speaking, people who know how to fly an airplane, a helicopter in any capacity, god forbid, this is a huge support, this should also be treated as such, and this cannot be discounted, in fact, this problem is huge, and the essence of this problem is that in general , today, dasaf aviation, at one time, was probably the largest... well, we have 1,300 aircraft left now, and before that it was there several thousand, it has completely fallen out of the legislative field, that is, it does not exist, as such, today, de facto, it exists, in principle , it is doing well, but , unfortunately, the existing legislation simply does not see it, and here we see the opposite example of how it should be. and how it should work, and i think you understand perfectly well what i'm talkin

understood, i saw the interest of one deputy chairman of this incredible organization the second davankovderstand for themselves that this is a really pressing issue, in relation to the legislative proposals that have been made, noticed how detailed they are discussed, yes, that is, we must definitely find out about them some kind of solution, that is, these issues that are not brushed aside, secondly, there is a very good support team there, which really initiates these issues and supports the legislative preparation of these acts, there is sergey detyonyshev, and there is dmitry kulyakov, that team, who in every possible way prepares these legislative proposals, studies them, and prepares the entire list of questions for this, these are the assistants who are directly involved in preparing the work of this commission and the entire range of issues that are put forward there, it’s really overdue, a new meeting of the working group has now been scheduled, i really hope that this will give results and some kind of confidence, based on the reaction of davankova, i have that we will get the

but we can let people decide for themselves, because now what started , where did we come from, davankovr region, but in time they were not there right away, but then one thing, once an accident, twice a coincidence, they started with this initiative... sucker, that's why the head of the administration decides, the head of the administration, if i'm not mistaken, just on this point. maybe it’s a brand for him, maybe yes, but let’s ask the residents, so we don’t say we’ll ban it, we say let’s ask the residents, and if they they decide, then we’ll rename it, you see the difference, but of course, some of the burning heads there today ostanina, nina are communists, because in their leadership there is no such thing that people can vote, she says, new people proposed a ban, but we suggested that people find out, and if they don’t like it, then rename it, there is a difference, you won’t recall it, after such a reaction, you won’t recall it? communists need to be taught that they can not only ban them, but also what they can let people decide, what do you think? there will be a vote in the st