dave warner. dear president caen and commissioner, it has been a great honor to communicate with you, not just for your present role at the sfpuc but for your experience, expertise and values you bring to the commission. i'm sorry to report troubling information. in resolution 19-0057 march 26, 2019, regarding the bay dock to ecosystem, there is a clear system that directs staff to include biological outcomes in the voluntary agreement. but when reading the portion of the agreement for the river that was recently published on one of irrigation district's websites, there is no specific biological outcome mentioned. it is troubling not just because it is the primary objective of environmentalists, discussions with the sfpuc or perhaps even more so because of the accountability governance concern. if the commission makes a specific resolution, it is expected that staff will follow that resolution or communicate back to the commission that staff is having difficulty implementing it. otherwise, the res

. >> caller: i am dave warner. i would like to address my letter to this resolution. this is a example. the supersedes language deals with adaptive management language in the 2019 resolution i think says it is to be part of the t r.v. a initially proposed. the language in the current resolution is not clear on that. i think the way to solve this if you want to do what commissioner v ietor says. the whole meeting is an example how you are pulled on so many directions in these meetings. it is inconsiderate not to provide context when this is presented. please consider asking staff to substantially improve to present this and future resolutions. please consider delaying actions until a better presentation can be made in the issues that can be clearly resolved. thanks a lot. >> you have one question remai remaining. >> caller: this is peter with the tuolumne river trust. we appreciated meeting with stakeholders last week. that was a good example of collab boration. i believe you received a letter from the state salmon association and the trust with our recommendations. i

dave warner. dear president caen and commissioner, it has been a great honor to communicate with you, not just for your present role at the sfpuc but for your experience, expertise and values you bring to the commission. i'm sorry to report troubling information. in resolution 19-0057 march 26, 2019, regarding the bay dock to ecosystem, there is a clear system that directs staff to include biological outcomes in the voluntary agreement. but when reading the portion of the agreement for the river that was recently published on one of irrigation district's websites, there is no specific biological outcome mentioned. it is troubling not just because it is the primary objective of environmentalists, discussions with the sfpuc or perhaps even more so because of the accountability governance concern. if the commission makes a specific resolution, it is expected that staff will follow that resolution or communicate back to the commission that staff is having difficulty implementing it. otherwise, the res