thank you. >> thank you very much, david albright for that great summary of where the program is and what some of the implications are. now we are going to turn to call in to give us his take on where the negotiators might be able to go with the election ofrouhan thank you darrell and thanks to carnegie for hosting and thanks to all of you for coming out on a morning to listen to us. my remarksmentioned, will basically focus on three things, whether there is a window of opportunity with the election of rounani to make some diplomatic progress. second what a deal might look like and how investigators might approach set on getting a deal. also what the implications of a possible military strike on syria might be because it is obviously very much in the forefront of our minds at the moment. think there is a lot of skepticism in some quarters in congress among the israelis who is aounai, genuine moderate. he's not going to transform iran into a jeffersonian democracy. but he isgime insider also a pragmatist with a demonstrated history of being able to forge elite consensus on controversi

thank you so much david albright for all that. appreciate it.ll right, andrea. thank you very much. again, turn back to the devastation in new jersey today and hear from the local leader about the next steps for businesses and residents in the community. seaside heights mayor is joining us from the boardwalk area. mr. mayor, we appreciate your time. >> thank you for having me. >> if i can, i know we've heard from you over the course of the last 20 or so hours. now that daybreak has come, you've had much of today to sort of examine the damage there. can you just give us your gut reaction to what it looks like and feels like to you? >> while the devastation is certainly substantial, it could have been a lot worse. we're very, very grateful for that. we're grateful for the actions that were taken, the line drawn in the sand, the firebreak they had put up committing all the resources to the one area where it wouldn't go any further north. i think we're very, very fortunate to be at the stage we are, but there's a lot of affected businesses who are p

the first we will hear from david albright who is to my right. he's the founder and president of the nonprofit institute for science and international security. david and his team at isi has for many years have been a leading independence source of information on the nuclear programs in iran, north korea, pakistan, india, other states of concern to and among other things he's going to fill us in on the latest international atomic energy agency quarterly report on iran's program, and its implications for diplomacy and iran's nuclear capabilities. and next up will be colin kahl, an associate professor in the security studies program at the edmund walsh school of foreign service at georgetown university where he teaches courses on international relations, international security, middle east on u.s. foreign policy. is also a senior fellow at the center for a new american security, and from 2009-2011, he served as deputy assistant secretary for defense for the middle east. and then batting cleanup will be george perkovich, my friend and colleague for

we've identified the two loopholes that need to be fixed. -- be treated in much, david albright for that great summary of where the program is and what the implications are. now we are going to turn over to colin kahl to give us his take on where the negotiators might be able to go with the election of rouhani after the last round of the p5 plus one talks which were last held back in last april. the floor is yours. >> thanks to carnegie for hosting and for all of you for coming out in the morning to listen to us. as mentioned my remarks will basically focus on three things within there is a window of opportunity and that he election not hassan rouhani to make some diplomatic progress and second with the deal might look like and how the u.s. negotiators should approach getting that deal. and then finally i will say a few words at the end about the implications of the possible military strike on syria might be for all of this because that is the great forefront of our mind at the moment. i think there is a lot of skepticism that some of the quarter some converts among the israelis as it re

breakout capability are fair bely short -- fairly short, even relatively conservative people like david albrightthe middle of 2014 given the current trajectory. that's a short amount of time. so i agree with dennis' sense that we've got to this fairly quickly. we've got to try as part of our strategy to get to a bottom line here very quickly. i don't know if the iranians will allow us to do that, i don't know if the p5+1 will allow us to do that, but i think that's what we've got to try to do. and be for my part at the same time as we're pursuing -- and i agree with dennis, this has got to be a, to get international support and domestic buy-in here and to have any chance of succeeding with the iranians, i think it's going to have to be a serious proposal that's different from what we've put on the table before. i'm willing to accede to that, and i'm probably willing to sign up for the kind of very restricted enrichment capability that dennis has talked about provided that if, in fact -- and i know dennis has used the example, but this is -- our strategy's got to be like in 1991 with saddam. we g

david albright for the remarks and comments and insights and thanks everyone for being here and more information on the carnegie endowment website as well as the arms control association website including our new briefing book as the iranian puzzle. thank you. [applause] >> [inaudible conversations] more coverage this afternoon with a discussion on the of devotee of internet service providers to place restrictions or varying charges on data.gov usage and whether they have the authority to regulate the service providers. >> own personal opinion, and this isn't based on the opposition fonts' and the own personal opinion is that even if the punitive strike at this point could have an important psychological impact on the civilian population. and again, the radicalization that we've seen develop over time but was actually stopped for some time because of the positive development in syria is now starting up again as chemical weapons are being used and there is no response. so, my own personal opinion is that if there is nothing else and i do not to agree with a limited strike but if there

albright. then we'll get analysis from peggy noonan of the "wall street journal." susan page of "usa today." michael gerson of the "washington post," and harvard university's david gergen. it's all ahead because this is "face the nation." captioning sponsored by cbs from cbs news in washington, "face the nation" with bob schieffer. >> schieffer: and good morning again. well, the big news this weekend, the united states and the russians have agreed on a deal to get chemical weapons out of syrian hands. inspector this agreement, the syrians have one week to detail their entire chemical weapons stockpile, weapons inspectors will go to syria in november with the goal of destroying all the weapons by the middle of next year. the agreement will be backed up by a u.n. resolution that will leave the option of using force against syria if they fail to comply. our cbs news state department correspondent margaret brennan is traveling with secretary of state kerry. she joins us now from tel aviv. margaret, he is there there to tell the israelis what this agreement means and so on. how is this going? >> reporter: well, bob, secretary kerry is trying to reassure israeli prime