david albright, the two dafds davids.y luke. >> great reporting there from switzerland. that does it for this edition of "andrea mitchell reports." andrea will have more from switzerland tomorrow. thomas roberts joins me with what's coming up on msnbc live. >> hi luke busy monday. we're continuing to follow the breaking news, shooting outside of the nsa this morning. we'll take you to the very latest, plus new opposition to indiana's religious freedom bill. the president of the hrc will be my guest and new details on the mental health of the co-pilot whose plane crashed into the alps. that and much more coming up next. stick around. i'm not having a heart attack, it's my back. i mean bayer back & body. it works great for pain. bayer back & body provides effective relief for your tough pain. better? yeah...thanks for the tip! ♪ at mfs, we believe in the power of active management. every day, our teams collaborate around the world to actively uncover, discuss and debate investment opportunities. which leads to better decisi

tom foreman is joining us together with david albright a former u.n. nuclear weapons inspector.it all down for us. >> wolf one of the chief complaints of the prime minister is just that that this proposal really does not dismantle the nuclear capability for iran. listen. >> not a single nuclear facility would be demolished. thousands of centrifuges used to enrich uranium would be left spinning. thousands more would be temporarily disconnected but not destroyed. because iran's nuclear program would be left largely intact iran's breakout time would be very short, about a year by u.s. assessment even shorter by israel's. >> so there you have the basic claim that they're making iran's nuclear program remains largely intact. let's bring in the map. david, we'll talk about this. the sites scattered across iran right now, about 19,000 different centrifuges at work out there. you can see they've had tours in past years with ahmadinejad when he was there. here's an aerial view of the same thing. what about this claim, this idea that basically this will not be dismantled under this deal?

there is former secretary of state, madeleine albright. david from kansas. good morning.aller: good morning. i would like to say a few things about the presidents receiving their protection and pensions once they leave office. that has become a part of our morals and values that the people who came before our generation were -- you know when all the women went to work roving bombers, and all the men were in the war fighting the war, that is what made us on america and the greatest generation. you know, another thing, with any president, he has information inside his head that is very sacred and no one wants to let that get out. you should definitely give every president protection and security. he did his term. every president i see, when they come in office, their hair is all colored perfect. when they leave, they look like they have been in there for 20 years because the stress on our job is so unimaginable. most people don't even realize. a lot of people, they don't have morals and values. all they care about is the root of all evil and that is greed. host: we will go

david corn. >>> i'm joan by sandy berger, the former national security adviser for bill clinton, snow chairman of the albright no group. talk about the precedence, the protocols, this struck me as completely extraordinary. >> it is, when you weakening the power of this president, you weaken the authority of the presidency. power is indivisible. they're undercutting the authority of our president and the presidency. they've undercut the president in the midst of a delicate negotiation, and they've sent a message throughout the world that the president doesn't necessarily speak authoritatively for the united states. leaders around the world, every day, make decisions based upon their perception of the reliability of the president speaking on behalf of the united states and the extent you call that into question, you call america's power into question. so i see this more as a one-off ploy. i see this as a group of people who talk about a strong america having contributed to a weaker america p. >> i just wonder whether when bill clinton, the president you served, was engaged in the last 11th hour talks trying to