here to discuss the testimony's top take away is david bruno. long day yesterday.et's begin with that specific incident where robert mueller had to come back and issue a correction to what he said earlier. >> there is a lot of criticism on this point because he didn't come to a decision and it is not the prosecutor after job to exonerate. it was to prosecute or decline prosecution and he did neither. ibly28 he needed to issue that correction. >> you cannot have this conversation without talking about ag william barr and rosenstein. when he waved on the decision they stepped up to the big boy table and made the decision and said there is not sufficient evidence to prosecute and the door is slammed on that because of attorney general william barr and rosenstein. nothing new but what democrats 5 was mother was going to breathe life to the story, he did the opposite. the book is better than the movie in this situation and he was a huge disappointment and interesting to see how it is being spun by democrats as if it were a good thing. daymac what was your biggest take a

herhere to break it down for us, criminal defense attorney david bruno. good morning.do a membememorandum, we can maybe dn executive order. they're still fighting to get the question onto the census. ills there a path for that? >> the roberts court said the reasons they're giving is a pretext t and we need to do more investigation about the motives. i think personally the memorandum or the executive order is not a good path right now. because look at what happened to the travel ban. the lower courts just came out and stayed it. and i think that's probably what we're going to see. i can't see this being an actual solution to the problem because they need to print these questionnaires quickly. cheryl: also, there's this thing about the doj. they changed the entire legal team that is dealing with the citizenship question. isn't that really rare to have a complete legal team replaced at this moment? >> i think the rare part of the story is the type of lawyers that are coming in. because initially they had a specific unit dealt with these issues. is it rare? i mean, it appe

chip question on census but the doj say this is vote is a political stunt we bring in attorney david brunohis david to hold cabinet members in contempt? >> a very well specifically for the attorney generals it is only second time. first was eric holder in 2012 deal requesting it's and furious, and the republican congress held him in criminal contempt but what happens it goes through the -- department of justice whose headed by attorney general barr and they make the decision. so in the end it is going to be the same result as it was with holder, and they're going to find no criminal content in my opinion. >> that is why this is called political theater basically waste of time. >> sure. so much to discuss request you today also i want to talk about jeffrey epstein case. there's a major decision today on if he will be released they found a safe in his manhattan apartment with a fake pass fort indictments a wad of cash. is he a flight risk? >> sure earlier this week there was an actual hearing we heard from victims in the hearing which is rare. but the government made an argument to the judge

for a legal perspective, let's bring attorney david bruno. let's talk about this.lay a sound bite. this is the initial bombshell of the morning that was taken back in the afternoon and this was of course ted lou from california. i don't think we have the sound bite. i'll tell you what he said. let's play that then, please. thank you. >> i'd like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict donald trump is because of olc opinion stating you can't indict a sitting president, correct? >> that is correct. >> i want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. as we say in the report and i said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime. cheryl: it all comes down to that obstruction of justice question mark. what did you make of the clarification by mueller and what does this mean for president trump when he leaves office eventually? >> there's a lot of criticism on mueller right here on this point because he could have come to a decision. one way or the other. and a prosecutor, his decision was to pros

an active shooter situation we have just heard from a the police chief san bruno at barberini and also the fire chief said david cresta essentially the take away from that is that a they don't believe that there is a public safety. a threat at this moment, they believe that the suspect or suspects have a fled which leads us to. >>which leads us also worth noting they don't believe it was a random shooting so not that it makes it any less safe or the mall patrons that were there when there is a targeted shooting, but they do believe that there are 2 suspects 2 shooters and they do believe that these 2 individuals were trying to shoot either each other or someone else so. it is a little bit comforting that it wasn't just a random person trying to shoot up everyone that they could find because we do see way too much of that they are looking for 2 young adult black males, one that had a green colored hoodie these could be teenagers 1516 1718, they're not sure say the victims are right around that age is well indeed, and they believe that the 2 suspects took off towards the bart station they were seen running in tha

david: the g7 ministers just wrapped up a meeting in france. maria tadeo is there now with brunoomy and finance minister. maria? maria: so much happening here. we talked about digital tax, we talked about labor, we also talked about the dollar. to talk about all of this, i am joined by bruno le maire. has been ais g7 breakthrough when it comes to the digital tax. the americans are saying not so fast. where are we? minister le maire: we are moving on and that is the most important thing. we can call that a breakthrough or a step in the right direction. we are moving on. digital taxation is a key issue. you have a key business model and this new business model of the 21st century is not taxed at the right level. i think it is in the interest of all countries, including the u.s. cap a fair and efficient taxation of these new business models. we want to have the taxation system of the 21st century for the business model of the 21st century. and you make it clear president macron is committed to this. you said we could be looking at lifting our own national tax. can you take the step