if you remember david cameron, _ onshore wind. if you remember david cameron, in— onshore wind.e blue, go green, and then decided to— about vote blue, go green, and then decided to cut the green cap, as he said _ decided to cut the green cap, as he said but _ decided to cut the green cap, as he said but i — decided to cut the green cap, as he said. but i do wonder whether people have now— said. but i do wonder whether people have now become less resistant to onshore _ have now become less resistant to onshore wind and solar and other things— onshore wind and solar and other things now— onshore wind and solar and other things now that we have really seen the cost _ things now that we have really seen the cost of — things now that we have really seen the cost of energy and the insecurity, given the hold that russia — insecurity, given the hold that russia and other powers have over our energy— russia and other powers have over our energy supplies.— our energy supplies. nigel, is this then a case _ our energy supplies. nigel, is this then a case of— our energy supplies. nigel, is t

the problem is that we have got i the problem is that we have got people who carry on on what david cameronssil fuels and anything thatis that stops fossil fuels and anything that is safe and renewable is good, nuclear energy is clean, i do not agree with nigel that wind and solar does not cut it, they are actually incredibly efficient, but i do think you need lots and lots of options and i think what will be interesting is that maybe the crisis in ukraine in what is happening has made people that have maybe been resistant to onshore wind turbines and things, might take a better view and think, actually, if the alternative is no gas or frightfully expensive gas, then actually having an onshore turbine down the road or as i have got offshore, that is not a bad option. i got offshore, that is not a bad 0 tion. ., got offshore, that is not a bad otion. ., ., ., got offshore, that is not a bad otion. . . ., ., ., ., option. i am afraid we have to leave it there, option. i am afraid we have to leave it there. we — option. i am afraid we have to leave it there, we have _ option. i am afraid we ha

although david cameron is against britain leaving the you, he promises his people are referendum. he hopes this will strengthen his position as prime minister above all, he doesn't expect to be defeated. ah, but he's wrong. in june 2016. a wafer thin majority of 52 percent of britons voted to leave the you. the british people have made a very clear decision to take a different call. cameron resigns. ah, his successor theresa may have the difficult task of making breaks that happen. rex, it means breakfast and we're going to make a success of it. the 2nd female prime minister in british history has a good working relationship with the queen. but she is unpopular within her party and with the people. after 3 years, she finally gives up while the government stumbles from crisis to crisis, the royals add some glamour to the tristan. in may 2018. megan and harry get married. at the time. no one would have guessed that the marriage would soon spark a major family route among the windsor's. in july, 2019 forest. johnston replaces to resume and becomes elizabeth's 14th prime minister. whe

david cameron decided that ureen uk as well.pest and the solar industry fell apart overnight. it was catastrophic. would we be in quite a different— catastrophic. would we be in quite a different place now if those programmes had followed. given the way inflation — programmes had followed. given the way inflation is _ programmes had followed. given the way inflation is growing _ programmes had followed. given the way inflation is growing and - way inflation is growing and economic growth is not going, are you worried about inflation? it is you worried about inflation? it is hard to see _ you worried about inflation? it is hard to see when _ you worried about inflation? it is hard to see when you productivity is coming _ hard to see when you productivity is coming from, unless you have a government is willing to borrow and invest— government is willing to borrow and invest in— government is willing to borrow and invest in productive industries, we are in— invest in productive industries, we are in trouble. we have another austeri

it famously teams an estimate once during david cameron's time, upgrading them a few times after it being critical of the cover�*s economic management so it is not a certainty but it carries a lot of credibility because it is the imf. ~ , , imf. 0k. when energy bosses themselves — imf. 0k. when energy bosses themselves saying _ imf. 0k. when energy bosses themselves saying the - imf. 0k. when energy bosses| themselves saying the surging imf. 0k. when energy bosses - themselves saying the surging bills of up to 40% is truly horrific you are going to get worried. a0%, i mean, that is a frightening, staggering figure.— mean, that is a frightening, staggering figure. mean, that is a frightening, sta: caerin fiaure. . , ., staggering figure. that is the max. but i should _ staggering figure. that is the max. but i should think _ staggering figure. that is the max. but i should think the _ staggering figure. that is the max. but i should think the ft _ staggering figure. that is the max. but i should think the ft printed i but i should think the ft printed this with — but i should think the ft

david cameron decided that — with angela merkel.ion is telling are you not worried about the possibility of stagnation which was a horrible thing experienced from the 1970s. it’s a horrible thing experienced from the 1970s. �* , ., ., , the 1970s. it's hard to see where near productivity _ the 1970s. it's hard to see where near productivity will _ the 1970s. it's hard to see where near productivity will come - the 1970s. it's hard to see where near productivity will come from | near productivity will come from unless you have a government that is a keynesian government that's willing to invest and borrow in productive industries. i think we are in real trouble. we've got another austerity government making the same mistakes that they cut into... to the same mistakes that they cut into... ., , ., i. the same mistakes that they cut into... .,, ., the same mistakes that they cut into... ., , ., ., the same mistakes that they cut into... ., , . . . into... to be fair you could have a debate about _ into... to be fair you could have a de

it famously teams an estimate once during david cameron's time, upgrading them a few times after it being _ imf. 0k. when energy bosses themselves saying the - imf. 0k. when energy bosses| themselves saying the surging imf. 0k. when energy bosses - themselves saying the surging bills of up to 40% is truly horrific you are going

david cameron suddenly decided green policies were a bit expensive, he said cut the green crap and allinsulating people's houses, for onshore wind, which is the cheapest, and for solar energy fell apart overnight. it was catastrophic. we would be in quite a different place now if those programmes had followed on through from where they had been founded in 2010. given the way inflation is going and economic growth is not going, are you now worried about the possibility of stagflation, which was a horrible thing that was experienced in the 1970s? i think it is very hard to see where new paternity —— productivity is going to come from, unless you have a government that is government that is willing to borrow and invest in productive industries. i think we are in real trouble. we have got another austerity government making the same mistakes, that they cut into... to be fair, arguably, and you could have a debate about this, we don't have time, not this week, but you could say the same of the labour government in the 1970s, that it found itself trapped in that thinking we have got to make

we saw similar concerns from a minister who served under david cameron, and a former immigration mr whoerjohn ma'or. . . ., ,, , ., major. adam, thank you. -- immigration _ major. adam, thank you. -- immigration minister. - the unhcr called it a "troubling development" more than 150 palestinians have been injured in clashes with israeli police at the al—aqsa mosque, in occupied eastjerusalem. three israeli police were also hurt. tensions have been high in recent weeks as the fasting month of ramadan coincides with passover forjewish people, and easter for christians. israeli police said they entered the mosque to disperse a crowd, after rocks were thrown ontojewish worshippers at the western wall below. here's our middle east correspondent yolande knell. as day broke injerusalem's old city, sacred to three faiths, tensions were rising at its most bitterly contested site. israeli police say they moved in to disperse a riot by palestinian muslims at al—aqsa mosque. officers fired stun grenades and rubber bullets. palestinians threw stones and firecrackers. the violence came inside the doo

there was criticism from a former international to elephant secretary from the david cameron years, andster from the john major immigration minister from thejohn major years as well. i think the government was completely prepared for this push back. they are even relishing the opportunity to make the case for the need for this policy. maybe even in court at some point. we have an interesting insight into how the policy was formulated behind the scenes. civil servants and the home office were not able to precisely quantify the benefits of it, to be able to say it was value for money. so priti patel, the home secretary, had to issue something called a ministerial direction to push the policy through. home office officials tonight on sources are justifying that, saying you should not let a lack of data or imprecise modelling stop the government taking action. talking of ministers, there was a home office minister on the radio this morning who could give very few details about how this is going to work in practice. which makes me think this is an idea for a plan, rather than a fully worked

so, today, they budged david cameron into changing the question that will be put to us, so before the end of next year, voters will be asked not to say yes or no to the eu, but whether they want to remain or to leave the european union. you are very tanned, then! had you just been on a nice holiday or something? yeah, i started in august, started at the end of august, 2015, so yeah... can you remember that first moment, because obviously you had been on the telly shed loads before that, but you are now suddenly wearing this big title. i do. because i remember specifically, i started earlier and in a sign of things to come, i ended up starting earlier than i expected. because, actually, people might remember, there was an immigration crisis in europe and there was a lot of people on the move and then there was the terrible image of alan kurdi, the little child who had lost his life making a journey, and the bbc decided to make a special programme around the immigration process and i remember it in a phone call, i think from the boss of the time, saying, right, you're just going to star

lubov chernukhin has donated large sums to the conservatives, to play tennis with david cameron and borisjohnsonn, is a businessman and former deputy finance minister who fled russia after being dismissed by president putin in 2004. two years ago, we revealed how he had been secretly funded with $8 million by a russian oligarch from putin's inner circle. that oligarch, now subject to uk, us and eu sanctions, is suleiman kerimov. he denied having any dealings with mrs chernukhin whatsoever. now, in a leak of documents to the bbc and the international consortium of investigativejournalists, new information has come to light which raises questions about that. it's to do with the purchase of a property in north london, now under new ownership, bought back in 2005. we've seen leaked documents showing how secretive offshore companies hid the people involved in the purchase of this house back then. they appear to show that mrs chernukhin, as she now is, became a director of a company called radlett estates limited, and we've seen another leaked document which shows the owner of that company was the rus

david cameron saying publicly he was going to submit a letter of no confidence for the prime ministerd is trying to move on from partygate, that story is still there. is trying to move on from partygate, that story is still there.— that story is still there. is your sense generally _ that story is still there. is your sense generally that _ that story is still there. is your sense generally that amongst| that story is still there. is your - sense generally that amongst tory backbenchers, he has perhaps ridden out the storm with a bit of help from the crisis in ukraine. some mps who had been very critical of him said it was time for him to go, and are now saying it is not time for it to get rid of the prime minister. ladle to get rid of the prime minister. we still to get rid of the prime minister. 2 still have the groups of tory mps there have always been. a small handful have been very vocal and said borisjohnson has got to go, this is bad. you then have the loyalists who are larger, and then the bigger group who are just waiting to see if there are more fines, waiting for the end of

mo husseinjoins me now — he was noio downing street's chief press officer under david cameron.u are so welcome. thank you for joining us. how are you seeing this this evening? i joining us. how are you seeing this this evening?— this evening? i think it is a pretty damauuin this evening? i think it is a pretty damaging position _ this evening? i think it is a pretty damaging position for _ this evening? i think it is a pretty damaging position for the - damaging position for the government, for the conservative party and it will have long—term implications even though we are hearing today this digging in which i'm not surprised by, the ground was laid. the prime minister will not be resigning over this. i think the tide can potentially turn quite quickly. mps may not be in westminster but they are perhaps more with their constituents. there will be taking soundings, they will be hearing the reactions from the ground, making next week quite interesting when parliament does return. i think there is a longer term issue with the conservative party has long prided itself in the uk a

into psalm, even lost his job during the crisis and theresa may left during the brexit debacle in david cameron constitution, the prime minister is first among equals and there always others in cabinet that can step into his post. as i say with all moral conscience, the first time all moral conscience, the first time a prime minister is found to have broken the law whilst the number ten with all the sacrifices that have been made by the british people during this time, the prime minister should step down and so should his chancellor. it is should step down and so should his chancellor. , ., , ., ., chancellor. it is not been the good few da s chancellor. it is not been the good few days for _ chancellor. it is not been the good few days for rishi _ chancellor. it is not been the good few days for rishi sunak _ chancellor. it is not been the goodj few days for rishi sunak especially with the tax affairs of his wife and now this fine, or use a price of the prime minister and he have both been find? ~ ., , prime minister and he have both been find? ~ .,, ., find? when i last look at the fiuures, f

it is an - extraordinary combination, i spoke to a former head of policy under david cameron, who madee chancellor also find, rules that were introduced by government that said at the time to people, if you spot somebody having a party, ring the police. that is what the home secretary said. because these were potentially life—threatening events because of covid and at the time we did not have a vaccine to mitigate the risks of serious illness or death, and yet at a number of stages in the process this appears to have been happening and it seems to have been happening and it seems to have been accepted in downing street that there was nothing strange about this to such an extent that people did not even regard them as parties? the fact that not even regard them as parties? tue: fact that we not even regard them as parties? tte: fact that we were not even regard them as parties? tt2 fact that we were all being told in stark terms that we were in danger of getting covid and that it could kill us and it did for many people and that was horrendous, but the lockdown measures that were brough

there was an attempt by david cameron's government to do this a few years ago and it was eventually abandoneddoned because of the extent of the opposition.— extent of the opposition. in the meantime _ extent of the opposition. in the meantime there _ extent of the opposition. in the meantime there is _ extent of the opposition. in the meantime there is also - extent of the opposition. in the | meantime there is also pressure extent of the opposition. in the - meantime there is also pressure on the passport office after reports that people are facing long delays in getting new passports or getting their passports renewed. fix, in getting new passports or getting their passports renewed.- their passports renewed. a huge concern that _ their passports renewed. a huge concern that massive _ their passports renewed. a huge concern that massive delays - their passports renewed. a huge concern that massive delays in l their passports renewed. a huge l concern that massive delays in the passport office at the moment, partly simply because of the backlog of people didn't renew their passports during th

mark harper, who was in david cameron's cabinet, said he no longer had confidence in the prime ministerubmitted a letter calling for a vote of confidence in him. i letter calling for a vote of confidence in him. i regret to say that we have _ confidence in him. i regret to say that we have a _ confidence in him. i regret to say that we have a prime _ confidence in him. i regret to say that we have a prime minister i confidence in him. i regret to say. that we have a prime minister who broke _ that we have a prime minister who broke the — that we have a prime minister who broke the law is that he told the country— broke the law is that he told the country they had to follow. hasn't been _ country they had to follow. hasn't been straightforward about it and is now going _ been straightforward about it and is now going to ask the decent men and women _ now going to ask the decent men and women on _ now going to ask the decent men and women on these benches to defend what i _ women on these benches to defend what i think is indefensible. i am very sorry— what i think is indefensible. i am v

you may remember david cameron was formally working for greensill which spectacularly went bust in marcherstand this is unsettling, but they continue to deny wrongdoing. this comes 24 hours after offices in paris and in france were raided, of the wider global group, so again it puts questions over a company which employs thousands of people and is a very important strategic asset. sanjeev gupta asked for a bailout loan from the government last year. the government said we don't want to do that because we think your business affairs are too opaque, so they are trying to make it i guess less opaque. sis they are trying to make it i guess less opaque-— they are trying to make it i guess less opaque. as the sfo talked in an more less opaque. as the sfo talked in any more detail— less opaque. as the sfo talked in any more detail about _ less opaque. as the sfo talked in any more detail about what - less opaque. as the sfo talked in any more detail about what it - less opaque. as the sfo talked in any more detail about what it is i any more detail about what it is hoping to achieve?— any more

yesterday we saw mark harper, the former chief whip under david cameron saying publicly that he was goingust shows you that even though the prime minister has apologised and is trying to move on from partygate, that story is still there, and it still provides a platform for his critics to have a go. indeed it does, adam. but is your sense generally that amongst tory backbenchers, he has perhaps ridden out the storm with a bit of help from the crisis in ukraine, some mps who had been very critical of him saying it is time for him to go, and actually saying now it is not time to get rid of the prime minister? we still have those three groups of tory mps that there have always been. you've got the people who, a small handful who have been very vocal and said borisjohnson has got to go, this is bad. you have then got the uber loyalists, who are a larger group, and then you have got the bigger group who are stilljust waiting and waiting to see if there are more finds. they are waiting for the end of the metropolitan police investigation. they are waiting to see what happens at the local electi

lubov chernukhin has donated large sums to the conservatives, to play tennis with david cameron and borisjohnson suleiman kerimov. he denied having any dealings with mrs chernukhin whatsoever. now, in a leak of documents to the bbc and the international consortium of investigativejournalists, new information has come to light which raises questions about that. it's to do with the purchase of a property in north london, now under new ownership, bought back in 2005. we've seen leaked documents showing how secretive offshore companies hid the people involved in the purchase of this house back then. they appear to show that mrs chernukhin, as she now is, became a director of a company called radlett estates limited, and we've seen another document that shows the owner of that company was the russian oligarch, suleiman kerimov. mrs chernukhin became a director after the property was bought. one leaked document is signed lubov golubeva — her name before she married vladimir in 2007. lubov chernukhin first said through her lawyers, mrs chernukhin has never been a director of radlett and then, when we s