and of course our armed forces were damaged after david cameron plasma cuts. the fcd oh was rudderless with seven foreign secretaries in seven years. second — we have to accept that there is no going back, we must stop there is no going back, we must stop the 1990s clouding our vision, the post cold war peace as well and truly over. this is a changed strategic environment. the number of conflicts higher than at any time since 1945, the spectre of famine from gaza to sudan and most refugees and displaced people on record. i have occasionally asked on my travels here and on the doorstep of the country, when will the kremlin threat, this upheaval we are experiencing end? when will things get back to normal? my answer is that they will not. europe's future security is on a knife edge. bevan warned in 1948 that we would only preserve peace by mobilising such force and i quote "as we will create confidence and energy on the one side and inspire respect and caution on the other. " and this is exactly what we need now. that is why our foreign policy has had to change.

unless we forget that the last labour government met and has never been met by the tories since david cameron'suts and withjohn healy, we will lead and we will challenge to convince all of our nato allies that rising defence spending is a strategic necessity. and third, we must forge closer partnerships with the global south because the world is larger than the north atlantic and mediterranean, we cannot divorce the euro atlantic from the indo—pacific and the kremlin has spread its tentacles across the world spewing out misinformation on every continent. dispatching mercenaries to africa seeking closer relations. a grim vision of unending competition is not compelling to the vast majority of states. we must avoid repeating the mistake of the early cold war period where the west lost ground to the so—called third world, from jakarta to kampala, this movement was a result and today many of those same states are structuring their foreign of those same states are structuring theirforeign policy of those same states are structuring their foreign policy to avoid harm from us competition. to shape 203

pennsylvania chase founder and steve hilton former strategy director to former british prime minister david cameronpics included president biden 's mental acuity, california politics and mobilizing male in voters. this is about 20 minutes. >> all right, everybody. how are you doing? this is my first time. i feel very at home here. it is going to be the greatest event in america. congratulations. in a second i will talk to you about california and how we say california. there is something very serious that i want to say first, if i may. we are witnessing the unfolding of the most enormous political scandal in american history. as we are seeing the revelations this week of the scale of the cover-up of joe biden's incapacity, his mental and physical incapacity. many of us have been talking about this for years. from day one. we learned this week that joe biden, from the beginning of his presidency, requiredid a scripto have one-one meetings with members of his cabinet including the secretary off defense. now, before we moved here 12 years ago with my family, i worked as a senior advisor to a conservat

i remember i got so excited 2010, all those years ago, david cameron became prime minister and he saidng to put an end to punch and judy politics. and i thought, fantastic. of course it's got worse and worse and worse since then, and no political party will put an end to punch and judy politics. just criticising the other side, whatever they say, because it's the other side. and this is going to be the same thing with if reform have an inquiry, i'm afraid, because they can do what they like. but unless it's independent in the sense that it's cross—party, it nobody will take any notice of the conclusions. and of course mps from other parties. i'm sorry, with the best will in the world because of this party, political posturing are not going to take part in an reform inquiry. so frankly, it's a waste of money, a waste of time. the government needs to have a national inquiry to look at who is responsible for this tragedy, this constant cover up. and just watching charlie peters report before this programme came on air, it was we were watching it, weren't we? you know, it was astonishing,

because you are following in the footsteps of your former colleagues, there is david cameron, who wentrge osborne chancellor went and philip hammond also went to china. so would you go to china? , �* ., ., china? they weren't going to china? they weren't going to china point — china? they weren't going to china point when _ china? they weren't going to china point when our- china? they weren't going to | china point when our economy was in significant distress it is completely wrong for the chancellor, at a point when we have this stress in the bond markets with the consequences are five are set out for people right up and down the country, their living standards, businesses, livelihoods, the chancellor should be here at her station, chancellor should be here at herstation, reassuring chancellor should be here at her station, reassuring markets and trying to give some sense that this government gets the depths of the problem and it has some clear plans.- depths of the problem and it has some clear plans. there is a to see the — has some clear plans. there is a to see the chinese _ a to

you go back to the pint glass clinking moment with president xi and david cameron and we are a long waym that. keir starmer wants to reset relations but that golden age is not what reeves is going for at all. clearly china also needs to make some friends right now at a huge part of this will be about a focus on opportunities for the financial sector. but it does not stop the fact that the timing is risky. we are just over a week away from doll from being inaugurated. you already had some members of his team expressing concerns that maybe this will show a weak point in the special relationship. we had peter mandelson chosen to be the new u.k. ambassador to washington. he's been a long advocate of better relations with china that might not endear him to the new u.s. administration. the european union is also trying to put pressure on china over the war in ukraine. there's a lot of short-term downside risk for something that we understand will not yield many big announcements. >> may be more to expect. how should the u.k. approach its economic relationship with china? we discussed that wit

but in fact, a lot of the low picking fruit that david cameron did, you know, closing down dinosaur gasy been the reason for high fuel prices. that's because of the ukraine war and our failure to back up the national grid more effectively. so i think that's a bit of a straw man. just quickly on your your idea that reform is for things i actually perceive reform to be against the small boats. but if you drill into the small boats idea, it's more of a kind of cultural notion in terms of the vast balloon of migration. it's a spectre. >> it's less than a tent. it's a violating of the social contract that you can gatecrash a country and access its benefits, its social housing, get put up in hotels when people who are of that nation are freezing to death on the streets. working class voters in particular, will not put up with terms of that delivering real change, actual cost of living, lifestyle benefits for your average joe, voting either reform or labour at the next election. >> i don't believe cost of living benefits. >> we're paying £5.5 billion a year on our broken asylum system. how man

he ended up as deputy prime minister under david cameron, a real unity person and who actually probably making. a real shift given the fact that was consider the lobbying effort that was most crucial for meta given some of their challenges and some of the hacks and things that have happened. he was a chief of staff to president george w. bush. raises the question of how much they are putting on the front burner the importance of lobbying donald trump and how much a shift of tone that will be for this company in terms of content and moderation. jonathan: so many different angles to this. our regulatory and consumer angle. for a long time major tech firms have cloaked themselves in liberal values because they were afraid of the regulatory impulse of the left. they are waking up to reality. they need to be afraid of the ragged hillary impulse of the right -- regulatory impulse of the right. we have seen this at target, budweiser. the important business lesson came from michael jordan. when he turned around and said republicans by sneakers -- buy sneakers too. they have woken up to a more c

new age's cameron dawson is here nice to meet ya. my name is david. a pharmacist for 44 years and i'm from flowery branch, georgia. when i have customers come in i recommend prevagen. number one, because it's safe and effective. does not require a prescription. and i've been taking it quite a while myself and i know it works. and i love it when the customers come back in and tell me, "david, that really works so good for me." makes my day. prevagen. at stores everywhere without a prescription. ♪ so tonight i'm gonna party like it's 1999 ♪ from. jack: are markets poised to party like it's 1999 in 2025 the? s&p's up more than 50% over the past two years, best run since the late '90s. but stocks are off to a shaky start for the first trading week of 2025 the, so where is the market headed if from here? joining me now, new edge wealth chief investment officer cameron dawson. cameron, good to see you again. >> thank you for having me. jack: okay, so new edge has this thing where in all of your reports, you link it to an album, a musician or a line in a son

jonathan: up next tomorrow morning, we catch up with cameron dawson of new age wealth, david leibowitzk you for choosing bloomberg tv. ♪ at morgan stanley, old school hard work meets bold new thinking. to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real. matt: we are off to the races. 30 minutes until the start of trading. sonali: bloomberg's open interest starts right now. matt: a slowdown in consumer prices brings bats back at the fed will be able to cut rates. earnings season starts off with jp morgan, goldman sachs and wells fargo all reporting robust results and blackrock pulls in a record $641 billion in client cash. what larry fink saying that is the beginning. futures up, looking at 1.5 percent gains on s&p futur

and an australian banken david cameron and an australian banker, boris johnson , and banker, boris johnsond wallpapergate lucy letby. the child killer and failings of the nottingham killings. investigation of valdo calocane all of those things deemed more important, clearly to the prime minister in opposition than when he's in power now. it's an astonishing state of affairs. but first, the man of the moment. joining me now is gb news national reporter charlie peters. charlie, i also want to start by echoing what i've been saying to you all week. my son, what reporting you've been doing. you've captured the world's attention. elon musk has become something of a superfan. i don't think i've seen anybody else on the planet retweeted more than you. but joking aside, this conversation is firmly back in the spotlight, perhaps where it should have been years ago. you've been fighting on this, charlie for years. its front, its centre. we had a vote. the survivors didn't get what they want, but andy burnham dramatically enter into the fray. tell us the latest of what's been an astonishing week in p

. >> david cameron later said he regretted it. look at theresa may.you know, her plans were torpedoed by us. so we've got to break this cycle of broken politics. and that's what we're trying to do, because we'll get a result in 2028. snp governments, we've all failed and we've got to work together to put it right. >> and i think if we do that, i'll tell you what's been another achievement. i'll tell you what's been another successive government failure. and that's cracking down. i'm not going to call them grooming gangs. i'm going to call them child rape gangs. why? i can't understand this. why is labour of all parties? we're talking about thousands of girls from vulnerable communities in the north being raped repeatedly, often gang raped by largely pakistani men. why on earth wouldn't you have a public inquiry into this? and i know you're going to say, oh, there was an inquiry by alexis jay and that made 20 recommendations. but the scope of that inquiry was really narrow. all of the campaigners and the whistleblowers in this, maggie oliver jayne seni

we'rejoined byjessica cunniffe, former speech writer to david cameron and theresa may.was only two words a minute quicker. so is the difference between them? i quicker. so is the difference between them?— between them? i think the difference _ between them? i think the difference with _ between them? i think the difference with tony - between them? i think the difference with tony blair. between them? i think the i difference with tony blair was that he — difference with tony blair was that he was— difference with tony blair was that he was able _ difference with tony blair was that he was able to _ difference with tony blair was| that he was able to modulate. sometimes _ that he was able to modulate. sometimes he _ that he was able to modulate. sometimes he would - that he was able to modulate. sometimes he would speak. that he was able to modulate. . sometimes he would speak very slowly— sometimes he would speak very slowly but — sometimes he would speak very slowly but that _ sometimes he would speak very slowly but that other _ sometimes he would speak very slowly b