david campbell itonnermnn? — reverse brexit. david campbell bannerman? sorry, _ reverse brexit. david campbell bannerman? . reverse brexit. david campbelll bannerman? sorry, that was for reverse brexit. david campbell - bannerman? sorry, that was for me? i don't think it is delusional. i'm very aware... i do call it a coup, how they got rid of boris... aha, very aware... i do call it a coup, how they got rid of boris... a clue? yes, it is a — how they got rid of boris... a clue? yes, it is a coup. _ how they got rid of boris... a clue? yes, it is a coup. if— how they got rid of boris... a clue? yes, it is a coup. if you _ yes, it is a coup. if you actually analyse what went on, the use of the media, the cake, his advisers ate that cake, i don't think you ever saw it. a lot of this is farcical, but is very dangerous, and it is about brexit, and boris was very important to the referendum, campaigned with him in norwich, and he was very important to it and i think he's been punished for that more than anything. get rid of boris and you get labour in and they can start to reverse it, that's what it's all real

and so david campbell— primaeval, selfish man. and so david campbell bannermani mean, david mellor is there not a— disaster. i mean, david mellor is there not a fair— disaster. i mean, david mellor is there not a fair point in howe— is there not a fair point in boris actually— is there not a fair point in boris actually being your party's— boris actually being your party's greatest electoral oeeehe — party's greatest electoral oeeehe why— party's greatest electoral asset? why on- party's greatest electoral asset? �*vaj’p hih“ c party's greatest electoral- asset? why on earth would you want him to go quietly? you need him, don't you? you actually need him to win. you need him in the red wall. you need him out campaigning in. well, we don't know whether boris remains an electoral but look the electoral asset, but look at the end of the day, it was perfectly possible for boris johnson having done incredibly well and winning election on to actually settle down, govern the country properly. instead settle down, govern the country properly . instead of saying that pro

and so david campbell— primaeval, selfish man. and so david campbell bannermanhere not a— disaster. i mean, david mellor is there not a fair— disaster. i mean, david mellor is there not a fair point in here— is there not a fair point in boris actually— is there not a fair point in boris actually being your party's— boris actually being your party's greatest electoral essete — party's greatest electoral essete hhy— party's greatest electoral asset? why on- party's greatest electoral asset? �*thjy ti“ i party's greatest electoral- asset? why on earth would you want him to go quietly? you need him, don't you? you actually need him to win. you need him in the red wall. you need him out campaigning in. well, we don't know whether boris remains an electoral but look the electoral asset, but look at the end of the day, it was perfectly possible for boris johnson having done incredibly well and winning election on to actually settle down, govern the country properly. instead settle down, govern the country properly . instead of saying that properly. instead of saying th

david campbell—bannerman is the chairman of the conservative democratic organisation, and a supporteron. i got his reaction. it has been a total disgrace, a total stitch up... hang on... i'm not finished. why is this a total stitch up and a total disgrace? this is a parliamentary committee that has investigated borisjohnson. they've handed him their report, we don't know the results of the report... they invented this term, "recklessly misled," it has no legal basis whatsoever, and that seems to be the basis of the report. and also sue gray, who is now working for the leader of the opposition. that has all been hushed up, they said they have overlooked that, but it is completely wrong, it is outrageous, the public knows this is a stitch up, and it is outrageous. live now to charlie rowley, former conservative special adviser to michael gove and theresa may. thank you very much forjoining us. firstly, with borisjohnson, lots of questions asked about whether his conservative party career is over. what are your thoughts? goad what are your thoughts? good afternoon- _ what are your though

that was opposition labour mp chris bryant. j live now to david campbell bannerman, who's the chairmanconservative democratic organisation. thank you very much forjoining us. what are your thoughts? is it a good thing that he has resigned if he is found to be lying to parliamentmight be, if he hasn't been found to have lied to parliament. they made up their own criteria. we lied to parliament. they made up their own criteria.— lied to parliament. they made up their own criteria. no court of law would have _ their own criteria. no court of law would have been _ their own criteria. no court of law would have been able _ their own criteria. no court of law would have been able to - their own criteria. no court of law would have been able to get - their own criteria. no court of law| would have been able to get away with this, it was like the judge tweeting that the defendant was guilty, which harriet harman did with the privileges committee. it has been a total disgrace, a total stitch up... has been a total disgrace, a total stitch upw— has been a total disgrace, a total stitch up. . ._

i'm joined now by the borisjohnson supporter and former mep david campbell—bannerman.iour by two supporters and a sense that also, it was a coordinated response. j supporters and a sense that also, it was a coordinated response.- was a coordinated response. i think this is outrageous _ was a coordinated response. i think this is outrageous and _ was a coordinated response. i think this is outrageous and stalinist. - this is outrageous and stalinist. mps are elected to parliament, they have their own voice. why they are being silenced in this way is outrageous. what we should be discussing is, did the deputy speaker according to guido fawkes have a lockdown party herself, the deputy speaker? is the speaker going to mount an inquiry into her? these are far more important issues than what this privileges committee is up to. ~ ., , what this privileges committee is up to. . . , , ., to. what this privileges committee seems to be _ to. what this privileges committee seems to be suggesting _ to. what this privileges committee seems to be suggesting is - to. what this privile

, who he— with david campbell bannerman, the helmet— with david campbell bannerman, who ist it, you know, i think the speaker needs to look at the deputy speaker following the allegations from guido fawkes about did she have a lockdown party and was bernard jenkin there then he's enquiring into that because he was on the privileges committee and also while they're at it, did number 10 say it's fine for harman to continue? i mean, who in number ten did that? so there's a lot of inquiries that are needed and that go way beyond this one. and this one has not done a great job, i'm afraid . no. job, i'm afraid. no. fascinating.- job, i'm afraid. no. fascinating. i,- t: no. fascinating. i, for one, job, i'm afraid. no.— fascinating. i, for one, welcome the hhtahtv— fascinating. i, for one, welcome the hate hhte— fascinating. i, for one, welcome the inquiry into whether or not hheveea— the inquiry into whether or not hheteea hav— the inquiry into whether or not theresa may attended an illegal htetttvh— theresa may attended an illegal heathen-patty.- theresa may attended an illegal

joined by the former conservative david joined by the former— conservative-david campbell conservative mep david campbell bannermanns at 4:00 today. yeah, it is. i mean— happens at 4:00 today. yeah, it is. i mean, there's— happens at 4:00 today. “cs" e i mean, there's some pretty is. i mean, there's some pretty glaring— is. i mean, there's some pretty glaring ne— i mean, there's some pretty glaring ing situations that one eene— glaring ing situations that one eewie imagine— glaring ing situations that one could imagine being incredibly damaging— could imagine being incredibly damaging fen— could imagine being incredibly damaging for rishi. the fact is wen— damaging for rishi. the fact is we even— damaging for rishi. the fact is that given what— damaging for rishi. the fact is that given what we've seen so far that given what we've seen so fen ef— that given what we've seen so fen en nne— that given what we've seen so far of the relentless flip neeenne— far of the relentless flip flopping as_ far of the relentless flip flopping as to whether or not nnew-we — flopping as to whether or not nnew-we een— flopping as to

so joining me now is former member of the european parliament, david campbell bannerman, pollster bannermany. many— conference and now, you know, many, many months on the public are many, many months on the public perry— many, many months on the public are now pretty clearly of the view— are now pretty clearly of the anar— are now pretty clearly of the view that mr— are now pretty clearly of the view that mr johnson was indeed nisieaiing— view that mr johnson was indeed misleading statements to the noise— misleading statements to the noise or— misleading statements to the house of commons. so, yes , there house of commons. so, yes, there sriii— house of commons. so, yes, there sriii is— house of commons. so, yes, there sriii is an— house of commons. so, yes, there still is an element— house of commons. so, yes, there still is an element of— house of commons. so, yes, there still is an element of those who werei— still is an element of those who voted conservative,— still is an element of those who voted conservative, who do trust the voted conservative, who do trust rne nine— voted conserva

it's david campbell—bannerman. who is campbell—bannerman.if you look foreign born prison look at the foreign born prison pogutotton— look at the foreign born prison pogutotton tn— look at the foreign born prison population in this country, it's a population in this country, it's o—tno- population in this country, it's. a_the thousands. a huge number in the thousands. ant—onoonoto- a huge number in the thousands. and—prisoners is. and each of those prisoners is ooottng—gtonti and each of those prisoners is. costing—grandlyear costing us about 40 grand a year to—ant- costing us about 40 grand a year to—ant tnot-oi to keep locked up. and that's tuot— to keep locked up. and that's just-enormous— to keep locked up. and that's just enormous burden on the just an enormous burden on the toopoyon — just an enormous burden on the toopoyot. wot— just an enormous burden on the toopoyot. wot-tt- just an enormous burden on the taxpayer. not-it a- taxpayer. not only is it a tongot— taxpayer. not only is it a tongot to— taxpayer. not only is it a danger to