levine nyack and david criteser who studied climate change for the heritage foundation, one of my favorite. >> we'll send you a pledge card. >> that's good. it's up where we got to get you over there. you and i have been talking about this issue for many years. i don't understand how you can have a position that you've got right now. a lot of people are saying that -- 97% of the peer-review literature in this field says that humans are causing climate change. let me show you who does not agree with that. donald trump, professor donald trump is on your side. it's very expensive global warming bs, that's a scientific term, it's got to stop. professor erick erickson says the difference between the people who believe in the second coming of jesus and those who believe in global warming is that jesus in fact will return. can you explain to me why you're on the side of professor donald trump? >> absolutely. happy to do it. 97%, by the way, is a bogus term. they threw out about 97% of the literature they're looking at because it didn't say anything. >> because it wasn't peer reviewed. >> but it d

on the left van jones, on the right, newt gingrich, in the crossfire, levine nyack and david critesercold brings out the skeptics. will it put the climate change debate in the deep freeze? tonight on "crossfire." >>> welcome to "crossfire," i'm van jones on the left. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. in the crossfire tonight, guests on opposite sides of the global warming debate. on this extraordinary cold evening when atlanta is colder than moscow, i want to begin by sharing some inconvenient facts about the theory of global warming. in 2007 al gore and the bbc both shared this prediction -- the arctic would be ice-free by 2013. last year ice in the arctic grew by 60%. as for the alarmist claim that global temperatures would rise for the foreseeable future, temperatures have flat lined for the past 16 years. the facts are challenging politically correct theories. there's enough evidence to at least have a serious debate about carbon taxes, destructive regulations and job-killing high cost energy proposals. is it cold enough for you? >> it's about to get hot in here. i'll tell you th