. >> david druker is the senior correspondent of the washington examiner. what did nancy pelosi say. anti- immigrant or anti- abuse of presidential power. >> the republicans are split some favor a plan to citizenship. and you have a lib ratline with other. but they think that the president's executive order that legalizes 4.1undocumented immigrants and gives them work permits, they think that was an overreach of his executive order and unconstitutional. the republicans are trying to roll it back. >> and so they are voting and trying to allow the department of the homeland security funding to go forward without money for the president to implement his programs and republicans control both houses of congress. why can't they get it through? >> the president has all of the money he needs for the executive action and all of the money comes from direct fees and doesn't require appropriation from congress or authorization from congress. we know if the president signed the law, it would roll back his executive action. who is standing in the way of the bill that ful

david druker, good to see you. thank you. >> thank you. >> fox news brings you all the latest on the race for the white house. tonight, don't miss fox news reporting election 2016, the many early contendsers. brett bayer sits down with one of them wisconsin governor, scott walker. here is a sneak peek at the show. ♪ bring back oh, bring back wisconsin to me. >> courageous. >> blinds ambition. >> compassion ateatecompassionate ♪ bring back wisconsin to me. >> fateful. >> polite and deadly at the same time. >> the honorable scott walker. >> they are talking about scott walker, 45th governor of wisconsin. to some, he's a political pit bull. to others, he is the savior of his state. >> that's a good tease. don't miss fox news reporting election 2016 the many early contenders. that's tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern right here on fox news channel. >> should be a fascinating look. >> oh, yes. >> and an interesting governor. >>> have you heard about this? a lesson gone horribly wrong? or is it child abuse? the case of a 6-yea