>> one of your colleagues on the "new york times" david brooks had an article last week, and the last sentence of his article was that he fully, foley may not of been there, that he expected within a year it was likely that trump would either have resigned or been impeached. would you agree? >> well, this is another, another, i mean, you can't absorb the craziness of what's happening fast enough for another crazy thing to happen. before the election all the house republicans are talking about a hillary clinton impeachment, and now everyone is talking about a trump impeachment. what a difference a week makes. you know, in david's case it might've been wishful thinking, but alan litman, you know, the american university professor, he was the only kind of professor, historian in the country to say that trump would win, is also saying trump will be impeached. so things are in washington in a complete state of chaos so i don't know. i become i think as americans we somehow have to hope that washington gets itself together. >> could you explain a little about the culture of the "new york times" in the months preceding george bush is invas