the i has an exclusive interview with thejustice secretaty, —— secretary, david gauke, who tells thegn secretary, borisjohnson‘s alternative brexit strategy threatens the survival of the uk meanwhile leading brexiteerjacob rees mogg writes in the daily telegraph urging the prime minister to listen to mrjohnson, and back what he calls a super canada style plan. a warning that criminal gangs are grooming children who have been excluded from school, is the lead in the times. one expert tells the paper that the scale of grooming is on a par with child sexual exploitation. the daily mail reports that the details of at least 50 million users of the social media platform have been hacked by criminals. and this story also features on the front of the financial times as they say facebook‘s share price fell more than 3% following the announcement. the sun leads with the pain of take that star gary barlow, as he opens up about the loss of his daughter, poppy. a special investigation by the guardian reveals that hundreds of university academics have been accussed of bullying students and colleag

the sunday telegraph has thejustice secretary, david gauke, calling for as many prisoners as possiblept to help with rehabilitation. and the sunday express carries a full page headline, with claims that a former kgb officer has exposed how russia demanded the murders of dissidents in an identical method to the salisbury attack. so, a varied set of front pages 7 let's see what our reviewers make of it all. dominated by boris johnson dominated by borisjohnson once again. we start with the mail on sunday. and borisjohnson saying the suicide jibe, sunday. and borisjohnson saying the suicidejibe, the suicide sunday. and borisjohnson saying the suicide jibe, the suicide vestjibe at theresa may, typically colourful language from boris johnson at theresa may, typically colourful language from borisjohnson and people saying not entirely appropriate. i was interested to read comments on twitter. alan duncan, who worked with boris johnson said it was the most disgusting thing he had heard from a modern politician. there may be history between them but more interesting, the man who served in the

launching a consultation on the proposals, justice secretary david gauke said he wanted to make the processous. our legal affairs correspondent clive coleman has more. at present, divorcing couples are forced to blame each other for their marriage breakdown on the grounds of adultery, desertion or behaviour which it's unreasonable to live with, or prove they have been separated for a minimum of two years, even if the separation is mutual. like many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worse. it caused an awful lot of arguments. it caused me obviously to feel very hurt, i got angry, then there were arguments which my children were witness to, it hurt them, and i really think it was completely unnecessary. when couples divorce they are being torn apart emotionally and financially, often trying to work out sensible living arrangements for their children, so if you throw blame and fault into the process at that stage, most people think you're just making a bad situation a whole lot worse. the government's persuaded, and it's proposing removing the need to show evidence of the

soon benefit from a less confrontational process, under plans confirmed by thejustice secretary david gaukesure for reform intensified after a woman's appeal for divorce was rejected by the supreme court injuly due to her husband's refusal to split. in a consultation the government is proposing removing fault, and the ability of spouses to contest the divorce. ministers are to announce a review of the rail industry next week, following extended periods of disruption up and down the country. details are yet to be confirmed, but the department for transport said it was committed to improving journeys for passengers. labour said it would re—nationalise the railways. the liberal democrats are set to discuss wide—ranging proposals on the future shape of the party when their annual conference gets under way in brighton this morning. the changes, set out by the leader sir vince cable earlier this month, include allowing supporters — as well as fullyjoined—up members — to have a say in choosing who leads the party. let's get more on this from our political correspondentjessica parker. it's been a t

justice secretary david gauke says he's considering allowing no—fault divorces in england and wales civilianslee the last rebel held province in syria, ahead of a possible assault that could be the endgame in the country's seven year civil war. in san fancisco, a huge new project to remove plastic pollution from the pacific ocean there are people everywhere. stick to the plan. let's do this. let's do this. and we hear the true story of one of the biggest heists in us history in american animals, we'll find out what mark kermode thought of that and the rest of this week's releases in the film review it's 5 o'clock, our main story this evening. british airways has apologised to customers for what they call a sophisticated breach of the firm's security systems, and have promised compensation. hackers have managed to get access to the details of 380,000 payment cards that customers used to book flights in the two week period between the 21st august and the 5th september. ba say that personal and financial details of customers making or changing bookings has been compromised, that's names, email a

the sunday telegraph has justice secretary david gauke calling for as many prisoners as possible to be telephones in their cells in an attempt to help with rehabilitation. the sunday express carries a full—page headline with claims that a former kgb officer has exposed how russia demanded murders of dissidents in an identical method to the salisbury attack. well, plenty for us to get our teeth into theirjust well, plenty for us to get our teeth into their just the front pages alone. let start with the daily mail and thisjive alone. let start with the daily mail and this jive i alone. let start with the daily mail and thisjive i borisjohnson that alone. let start with the daily mail and this jive i borisjohnson that a rather unfortunate choice of words perhaps one that gets headlines. macro one —— —— jibe. perhaps one that gets headlines. macro one -- -- jibe. very much like him. he said the suicide vest detonator was headed to michel barnier but obviously an escalation ofa warof barnier but obviously an escalation of a war of words between various factions in the conservative party and

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by thejustice secretary david gauke a consultation the government is proposing removing fault, and the ability of spouses to contest the divorce. the government has launched a consultation proposing removing all these issues. the changes would apply to heterosexual and gay marriages, and civil partnerships. ministers are to announce a review of the rail industry next week, following extended periods of disruption up and down the country. details are yet to be confirmed, but the department for transport said it was committed to improving journeys for passengers. labour said it would re—nationalise the railways. the liberal democrats are set to discuss wide—ranging proposals on the future shape of the party when their annual conference gets under way in brighton this morning. the changes, set out by the leader sir vince cable earlier this month, include allowing supporters — as well as fullyjoined—up members — to have a say in choosing who leads the party. let's get more on this from our political correspondentjessica par

launching a consultation on the proposals, justice secretary david gauke said he wanted to make the processs acrimonious. our legal correspondent clive coleman reports. at present, divorcing couples are forced to blame each other for their marriage breakdown on the grounds of adultery, desertion or behaviour which it's unreasonable to live with, or prove they have been separated for a minimum of two years, even if the separation is mutual. like many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worse. it caused an awful lot of arguments. it caused me obviously to feel very hurt — i got angry, then there were arguments which my children were witness to. it hurt them, and i really think it was completely unnecessary. when couples divorce, they are being torn apart emotionally and financially, often trying to work out sensible living arrangements for their children, so if you throw blame and fault into the process at that stage, most people think you're just making a bad situation a whole lot worse. the government's persuaded, and it's proposing removing the need to show evidence of t

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by the justice secretary david gauke a consultation, the government is proposing removing fault and the ability for spouses to contest the default. the changes would apply to heterosexual and to gay couples in both civil partnerships and marriages. ministers are to announce a review of the rail industry next week, following extended periods of disruption up and down the country. details are yet to be confirmed, but the department for transport said it was committed to improving journeys for passengers. labour said it would re—nationalise the railways. tory peer lord heseltine says borisjohnson will become the next leader of the conservatives, but warned the move is likely to divide the party. the former deputy prime minister, an outspoken critic of mrjohnson, told bbc radio 4's ‘the week in westminster‘ that the recent slew of negative headlines had not done the former foreign secretary "irreparable harm". has he done himself irreparable harm ? i don't think he has. what you have to say to yourself is, who is the tory me

launching a consultation on the proposals, justice secretary david gauke said he wanted to make the processess acrimonious. our legal correspondent clive coleman reports. at present, divorcing couples are forced to blame each other for their marriage breakdown on the grounds of adultery, desertion or behaviour which it's unreasonable to live with, or prove they have been separated for a minimum of two years, even if the separation is mutual. like many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worse. it caused an awful lot of arguments. it caused me obviously to feel very hurt — i got angry, then there were arguments which my children were witness to. it hurt them, and i really think it was completely unnecessary. when couples divorce, they are being torn apart emotionally and financially, often trying to work out sensible living arrangements for their children, so if you throw blame and fault into the process at that stage, most people think you're just making a bad situation a whole lot worse. the government's persuaded, and it's proposing removing the need to show evidence of

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by the justice secretary david gaukecorrespondent clive coleman has more. at present, divorcing couples forced to blame each other for the marriage breakdown on the grounds of adultery, desertion or behaviour which is unreasonable to live with. all prove they have been separated through minimum of two years, even if the separation is mutual. like many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worse. many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worsem caused an awful lot of arguments, it caused an awful lot of arguments, it caused me obviously to feel very hurt, i got angry and there were arguments which my children were witness to, it hurt them. i really think that it was completely unnecessary, but it was purely based on wanting to get things done quicker. pressure to no-fault divorce has been growing for decades. why? because when couples divorce they are being torn apart emotionally and financially, often trying to work out sensible living arrangements for their children. so if you throw bl

david gauke says allowing more inmates to make private calls would be a "real game changer" in improvingustice secretary‘s proposals don‘t go far enough — and there are more pressing issues that need addressing. on the back burner a few months ago. this was put on a back burner and has reared its head and we are talking about 20 prisons, but there are still 100 prisoners without this technology including telephones. do you think it would be a good idea? i feel he has got his priorities wrong. the priorities are safe prisons. safe for staff and safe for prisoners and that includes giving members the tools to do theirjob and that is why we will be insisting that pava spray is rolled out immediately in order to protect our members, but it is also about reinstating the retirement age to 60, because we have to work in the most hostile and violent workplace in western europe. in cell technology including phones is a good idea because it will help prisoners maintain those important family links even when there is regime restrictions and of course when we have to go into lockdown. it must be ver

thejustice secretary david gauke has said he thinks as many prisoners as possible should be given phones dial only pre—approved numbers and would still have to pay for the calls. however the minister has called the idea "a real game—changer" in improving behaviour — citing similar measures already in place in prisons in germany. mark fairhurst from the prison officers association said prison schemes don't go far enough this was put on a back burner and has reared its head and we are talking about 20 per prisons, but there are still 100 prisoners without this technology including telephones. do you think it would be a good idea? it would give prisoners more contact with their families and potentially stop areas of friction and tension which cause problems? i feel he has got his priorities wrong. the priorities are safe prisons. safe for staff and safe for prisoners and that includes giving members the tools to do theirjob and that is why we will be insisting that a spray scheme is rolled out immediately in order to protect our members, but it is also about reinstating the retirement age t

thejustice secretary david gauke has said he's increasingly convinced of the need to remove animosityers to married couples who want to separate. 0ur legal affairs correspondent clive coleman is at the ministry ofjustice. so what is driving this, why is this happening now, clive? there has been pressure for decades for a no—fault divorce system. the law commission recommended it in 1990, many senior judges favour it. why? because when you get divorced you get ripped apart financially and emotionally and many people think if you throw blame and filed into the mix you are making a bad situation a lot worse. we almost got it in 1996 when it was an act of parliament, but the government pulled back. what lies at the heart of any new system, we'll have to wait to see the detail but my guess is that we will be moving away from a system based around fault and blame to a system that is essentially a notification system. so ifa essentially a notification system. so if a spouse says that the manager has broken down irretrievably and after a defined period of time, it could be six months, it coul

thejustice secretary david gauke has said he's increasingly convinced of the need to remove animosityive barriers, to married couples who want to separate. our legal affairs correspondent, clive coleman, is at the ministry ofjustice. clive, why‘s the government considering this now? well, jane, for decades now pressure as been bill foger a no fault divorce system, back in 1990, the law commission recommended one, and many seniorjustices law commission recommended one, and many senior justices favour one, why is that? well, it is because when you are getting divorced you are being ripped apart emotionally and financially, you are trying to work out sensible living arrangements for your children, if you throw blame and fault into the mix, most people think you are making a bad situation a whole lot worse, we nearly got no fault divorce back in 19th, it was in an act of part. so what would a no fault system look like? if you strip blame and fault out you are left with a notification system where by if a spouse says this marriage has broken down and if they don't say that after a fixed pe

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by thejustice secretary david gaukernment is proposing removing fault, and the ability of spouses to contest the divorce. the government has launched a consultation proposing removing the need to allege "fault", and the right of spouses to contest a divorce. the changes would apply to heterosexual and gay marriages, and civil partnerships. i've been speaking to nigel shepherd, head of family law at mills and reeves. he welcomed today's decision. i have been campaigning for this for the best part of three decades, along with my organisation. i think this is a really positive step. the government has been listening to the calls for reform and most importantly i think this is great news for the couples that i am helping on a daily basis and most importantly for their children because the current system pushes people into conflict, it means that they are looking backwards, rather than looking forwards and we need a modern process for a modern society and these changes will certainly bring that about in my view. there will b

david gauke says allowing more inmates to make private calls would be a "real game changer" in improvingom the prison officers association says thejustice secretary's proposals don't go far enough — and there are more pressing issues that need addressing. this was put on the back burner a few months ago and obviously it's reared its head again and now he wants to invest in, i believe, 20 prisons, but that still leaves over 100 prisons still without in—cell technology including telephones. i think he's got his priorities all wrong. the priorities at this moment in time are safe prisons — safe for staff and safe for prisoners, and that includes giving poa members the tools to do theirjob, and that is why we will be insisting that pava spray is rolled out immediately, as soon as practical, in order to quell violence and protect our members. but it's also about reinstating a retirement age to 60 for all operational prison staff, because we have to work in the most hostile and violent workplace in western europe. now, in—cell technology, including phones, is a good idea because it will help p

thejustice secretary, david gauke, will announce a consultation on no—fault divorce.to remove some of the "unnecessary antagonism" created by the system, as our legal affairs correspondent, clive colman, reports. there has been pressure for decades for a no—fault divorce system. it was recommended in 1990. many seniorjudges favour it. why? when you are getting divorced, you're being ripped apart emotionally and financially and many people feel that adding blame makes a bad situation worse. we almost got it in 1996, it was in an act of parliament, but they pulled back. what lies at the heart of any new system? we will have to wait and see detail but my guess is we will be moving away from a system based around fault and blame. to a system that is essentially a notification system. if a spuse reports the marriage has broken down irretrievably and after a defined period of time, could be six months or a year, if they are still saying that then they will be entitled to a divorce as of right. some people will say that undermines the institution of marriage but many will sa

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by thejustice secretary david gaukepondent clive coleman has more. more details have emerged about government plans to overhaul "archaic" divorce laws in england and wales. couples wishing to divorce could soon benefit from a less at present divorcing couples are forced to blame each other for the marriage breakdown on the grounds of adultery, desertion or behaviour which is unreasonable to live with, or prove they have been separated for a minimum of two years, even if the separation is mutual. like many, jenny thinks blame can make a difficult process a lot worse. it caused an awful lot of arguments. it caused me obviously to feel very hurt, i got angry, then there were arguments which my children were witness to, it hurt them, and i really think it was completely unnecessary but it was purely based on wanting to get things done quicker. pressure for no—fault divorce has been growing for decades, because when couples divorce they are being torn apart emotionally and financially, often trying to work out sensible livin

benefit from a less confrontational process, under proposals confirmed by thejustice secretary david gaukeremoving fault, and the ability of spouses to contest the divorce. the government has launched a consultation proposing removing the need to allege "fault", and the right of spouses to contest a divorce. the changes would apply to heterosexual and gay marriages, and civil partnerships. jo edwards is a lawyer and former chair of the family justice organisation, resolution — who have campaigned for a change in the divorce law. she joins me via webcam from lugano in switzerland. thank you forjoining us. first, your reaction to this latest development in divorce law?” your reaction to this latest development in divorce law? i am absolutely delighted with the consultation paper which has come out today, and cautiously optimistic about what that will now need to will be a change in the law and something which really resolution has been campaigning for the nearly 30 years. we have had the same divorce law for 50 years in england and wales. why do you think it has taken so long? why was there

the i has an exclusive interview with thejustice secretary, david gauke, who says that borisjohnson‘she uk. sticking with brexit, in the daily telegraph, leading brexiteerjacob rees mogg urges the prime minister to listen to mrjohnson — and back what he calls a ‘super canada' style plan. criminal gangs are grooming children who have been excluded from school. that's the lead in the times. 0ne expert claims the scale of grooming is on a par with child sexual exploitation. the daily mail reports that data from at least 50 million facebook user accounts has been hacked by criminals following a security flaw. this story is also picked up by the financial times, with news that the social media giant's share price fell more than 3% following the revelation. the sun leads with the anguish experienced by take that star gary barlow as he opens up about the loss of his daughter poppy. and a special investigation by the guardian reveals that hundreds of university academics have been accussed of bullying students and colleagues over the last five years. so a real mix of stories making the front

thejustice secretary david gauke has said he thinks as many prisoners as possible should be given phonesates would be able to dial only pre—approved numbers and would still have to pay for the calls. however the minister has called the idea "a real game—changer" in improving behaviour — citing similar measures already in place in prisons in germany. mark fairhurst, the national chair of the prison officers association joins us now from manchester. thank you for being with us. before we get your opinion, can you give us a sense of what you know this might look like, this scheme? there is also cable in many prisons and there is sometimes falls on cells. this was put on a back burner and has reared its head and we are talking about 20 per prisons, but there are still 100 prisoners without this technology including telephones.- you think it would be a good idea? it would give prisoners more contact with theirfamilies it would give prisoners more contact with their families and potentially stop areas of friction and tension which cause problems?” stop areas of friction and tension which cause

thejustice secretary, david gauke, is set to announce a consultation on no—fault divorce, after sayinge wanted to remove some of the "unnecessary antagonism" created by the current system. our legal affairs correspondent clive coleman is here with us now. clive, what more can you tell us? there has been pressure building for ano there has been pressure building for a no lame divorce system for years now. back in 1990 it was said we should have won. and seniorjudges believed we should have a no—fault system. when you get divorced you are being ripped apart emotionally and financially, as a couple you are trying to sort out the best living arrangements for your children, and many people say that if you throw blame and filed into the mix at that point you are simply making a bad situation worse. we almost got no—fault divorce in 1996, it was in an act of parliament. but it got looking back. last year there was an appeal against an order which kept a marriage of a0 years because the husband would not consent to a divorce. he didn't believe his behaviour was unreasonable to the point where

thejustice secretary david gauke has told the sunday telegraph as many prisoners as possible should bean exclusive with an ex—kgb officer who tells the paper he was ordered by the kremlin to "poison enemies". the observer leads with what is calls a "bombshell poll", revealing that members of the uk's three biggest unions all back a new referendum on brexit. it is slightly outlined with the labour party's it is slightly outlined with the labour pa rty‘s policy it is slightly outlined with the labour party's policy at the moment. a bit of politics in the papers today. writer and broadcaster robert meakin has been looking through the morning's papers. they are saying to call off the attack dogs, and then he is saying not to call the labour party dogs. they are now in the party, if you rewind three years, he was one of the so—called leaders in waiting, the so—called leaders in waiting, the likes of yvette cooper, andy burnham, and it seems like it now resides in a political nomads land really, because the labour party is still officially, the majority of the members in the labour party don

justice secretary david gauke says he‘s considering allowing no—fault divorces in england and wales civilians