david hardy provided no evidence to back up his claim. he just said the words.ecause so often, as sadly the cases, so often judges are deferential to the fbi and other intelligence and security agencies in the sorts of foia questions because the fbi tells the judges, we are not qualified to decide whether or not this constitutes a threat to national security to release, so we're going to tell you. it does and you should defer to us. in this case, the judge made a wonderful ruling and said, no, you can just say the words. the words are not just talisman. you have to back them up. you can't just wave them around like magic and expect us were expected court to give you what you want. so now the judge has required the fbi to provide substantiation for their seemingly preposterous claims that occupy houston were terraced advocating the overthrow of government. -- were terraced advocating the overthrow of government. 9 to do itntil april openly or expert in camera declaration for secrecy mission to the judge or she can review the documents. >> what about this assassin