let's get more from david herbert. this has been a long and bitter fight between management and the unions. were they ever likely to reach an agreement? >> reporter: generally, it's agreed they were never going to reach the agreement. certainly, not in the 21 days they were trying to go against. this started in august of last year, the negotiations began. they couldn't reach an agreement. that's when qantas grounded and brought the whole dispute to ahead. they ordered an end all and gave them 21 days to agree to conditions. they came up with some agreement. then today, we find out that the 21 days is up. they haven't reached an agreement. now they are going to impose a solution on the whole affair. >> many people in australia would be thankful that a deal will be forced upon the unions and on qantas. is it easy to say at this stage which group the management or the unions any deal is likely to favor? >> reporter: i think you'd probably think that the qantas management have a bit of an upper hand. they were the ones who

kaiser this is the kaiser report i finally made it to the house of commons to give david cameron a piece of my mind herbert yes indeed max keiser david cameron gets s t f used by max kaiser and you'll notice minority the criminals who have taken what they can get i say this we will track you down we will find you we will charge you we will punish you we pay for what you have asked the f.b.i. you asked t. f. you david cameron because you're completely off base here you are a total product and elitist school banking schmucks here it's blatantly obvious that your own bankers are financially we are people. out there. and i'll be in london soon enough you know we just got back from ireland are you in our world sorta visit all the hot spots around the world as we push back against the criminal banking class warming up for the great inquisition part numerous double o. twelve yeah well the book they're. looking forward to what else well speaking of the global financial name computes they of course were meeting down in new. last week and one of the talks to emerge was in this next headline buddhist bank central ban

george herbert walker bush, the last through republican candidate, based on their positions could not be nominated by these republican voters given their positions on immigration. >> brown: david, does that sound right to you? and what of gingrich? >> i'm not sure huckabee could win the caucus. it's the position he has always held. it showed he was brave enough to say it. in the past, otherring have said we're not going to send home 11 million people who have been here for decades as mark said. to me it's a character test for mom. mom knows in his heart of hearts we're not going to send thee pease home. is he going to say the truth he believes or willing to say anything to be elected? i think gingrich is probably not going to be hurt all that much because i think a lot of people who want to restrict immigration rights basically know this reality as long as they can get the border enforced and controls on illegals as long as there can be enforcement on employeres, they understand the reality. but will mitt romney demonstrate that he understands the reality? will romney show that he's willing to say the honest truth, even if it may not be politically opportune at the moment? to

. >> and george herbert walker bush got elected with dan quayle on the ticket. >> no, no, i'm saying i'm with davidt the -- doesn't romney seem like an orderly guy, a 9:00 to 5:00 guy. not honorable does she look presidential, the running mate, but somebody who would give you their own state, which would be ohio, an essential state for republican candidates. >> look, david corn made my point. by talking about sarah palin. it's just -- you run a huge risk when you put someone on the ticket who causes voters to to mistrust your judgment by choosing someone who is not self-evidently from day one ready to be president. and as you say, chris, i think when it comes to mitt romney, you look at rob portman and you can see a sympaticoness. >> let's talk about your rule. when you pick that prn, it says who you are. let's talk, i want you to pick up here, john. if president obama, whatever he says when he does it, if he drops joe biden and brings in -- and brings in secretary of state clinton to replace him and even giving him the promise of the secretary of state job in her place, does that make him look str

george herbert walker bush, the last through republican candidate, based on their positions could not be nominated by these republican voters given their positions on immigration. >> brown: david, does that sound right to you? and what of gingrich? >> i'm not sure huckabee could win the caucus. it's the position he has always held. it showed he was brave enough to say it. in the past, otherring have said we're not going to send home 11 million people who have been here for decades as mark said. to me it's a character test for mom. mom knows in his heart of hearts we're not going to send thee pease home. is he going to say the truth he believes or willing to say anything to be elected? i think gingrich is probably not going to be hurt all that much because i think a lot of people who want to restrict immigration rights basically know this reality as long as they can get the border enforced and controls on illegals as long as there can be enforcement on employeres, they understand the reality. but will mitt romney demonstrate that he understands the reality? will romney show that he's willing to say the honest truth, even if it may not be politically opportune at the moment? to