david ho and jackson chang, who unfortunately is stuck in traffic somewhere between here and the east bay. this is kind of a successful story. i've represented jackson for approximately 20 years. he was, along with j. chang and john park, the most successful proximitier into an asian-american clientele. the clientele here remains predominantly asian-american college students and young professionals. mr. chang has thrown large events and a lot of 18-and-over events at many different establishment establishments. mr. chang is here. no longer stuck in traffic. the -- they've moved into l.a. and mr. chang has been doing a lot of parties down in los angeles. i was lucky to be at the opening of arena k town, korea town, in los angeles in the spring of 2018. that particular venue took off like a rocket ship and is extremely successful and very non-problematic. jackson bought the shares -- or entered into an agreement to start promoting parties at the mission sports bar, and eventually we are now at the a.b.c. with a stock transfer application. but the biggest problem we've had with this part

production and has released more methane into the atmosphere according to the paper's author robert ho worth david r. ak and some professor of ecology and environmental biology at cornell university and the us this recent increase of methane since 2008 is massive is globally significant is contributed to some of the increase in global warming we've seen and shale gas is a major player but it dissipates very quickly so he's saying like if we just stuff like our temperatures would noticeably decline because there would be less immediately this would be a thing whereas like all these climate change treaties are talking about carbon dioxide where it's like the inertia of you know anything we do if we completely stopped all global manufacturing and every single thing and stop cars and planes today it's still in motion all the carbon dioxide we've already admitted so he's saying that methane would dissipate quickly if you stopped all this fracking like today it would you would see a noticeable difference and amazingly nothing about fracking is profitable for the extract later they can raise and they don

president says the talks with the afghan taliban are dead, was it ever a ldod idea to ho talks with the talan at camp david? ryan: to hold talks with e taliban at camp david under current conditions would have been a horrible m. to bring in people whoen are ged right now in the murder of afghan civilians, men, women, and children, the killing of our troops and afghan security forces, with noease-fire, that would have been about as bad as it could get. laura: as a former u.s. ambassador to afghanistan, would you trust the taliban when they say, as ty apparently did it to u.s. officials, that they would cut ties with al qaeda in return for u.s. troop drawdown? ryan: this has been flawed from thwevery beginning. made a huge concession at the start by agreeing to t the taliban n baout the governme of afghanistan president. thatad been at taliban demand for years. we resisted it for years, and then we cepted it. the signal weaid was basically the same signal we sent in t i 1970'sn paris about vietnam, we're done, we are leaving. you can lk about the modalities, buwe are just done here. i think they were off to

david: we think perhaps this could be good news for the iranians. ,ho might it be worrying to particularly i'm thinking of saudi arabia. no big fans iran, they do not want the sanctions. they have to get the oil prices up. alix: they don't. if you going to the opec meeting on thursday, if there was any sort of negotiation between the u.s. and iran, it would be difficult for the market to absorb 1.5 million barrels of oil a day. it would be near impossible and it would make sally's job -- it would make saudi's job much more difficult. already exemptions because of geopolitical issues, so where with the supply even go? that would mean you would have to pick up demand, something the saudi's cannot do. david: president trump has had a close relationship with the kingdom. one thing they have not agreed on is the price of oil. trump has tweeted again and again he wants it low. opening things with iran might keep it low. how they reconcile that? alix: i do not think president trump wants to talk to iran. i think he wants to hurt the economy and drive them to the table. if iran will dig in their h

david. his abrupt resignation came as a surprise to the west week. "the new york times" reporting, "the national security adviser's dismissal came so abruptly that it was announced bare lly an ho after the white house scheduled a briefing for 1:30 where mr. bolton was supposed to appear alongside mike pompeo and treasury secretary mnuchin. mr. bolton is reported to have now left the white house." trump fired off a tweet indicating there were disagreements about policy. we've learned one of those was the kumbaya with the taliban which bolton reportedly described as, "getting in bed with killers in american blood." he canceled the trip into the dmz into north korea, trump is accompanied by e vunk kaun ivan. in mattis' case, it was a disagreement about syria policy. trump has seen the departure of his dni dan coats after disagreements about north korea and russia among other foreign policy flashpoints. mat mattis and coats plus former secretary of state rex tillerson, homeland security chief kirstjen nielsen, h.r. mcmaster, and now bolton round out a growing list of top security officials ousted over clashes with the president. the breaking news is where we start today with some