to which david hollister replied, nonsense.n shot residue. it was elements that could make up gun shot residue. any time a car is hit with that many high velocity rounds from an ar-15 you're going to expect to see lead. >> expert versus expert, matter of opinion, how would a jury know? what the state needed was something that would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that chad was lying about what happened out there in the night. and it seemed like maybe they had just exactly that. remember chad's insistence that the car came straight at him through the meadow as if for a final showdown? >> it looked like they were coming straight at me. >> like an assault, looked like they were attacking you. >> right. it was just my frame of mind was that these people were coming back to shoot at me. i had swerved my vehicle out of the way of their vehicle. i mean, they were coming straight back at me. we were nose to nose. >> but as the prosecutor told the jury, evidence found in the meadow told a very different story. the detectives took us the