david horowitz, next member of our panel, david horowitz was one of the founders of the new left in the 1960s, but has transitioned to combating those trying to destroy traditional american value. here's the front of the david horowitz freedom center. he is focused on academic freedom and returning universities to the presence of open inquiry and the fight to halt indoctrination at the classroom. he is the founder of students for academic freedom. jeffrey lord, our next speaker, sparked this topic in an article that he wrote recently in the american. >> tater jeffrey lord brings years of political expertise to the table i if you served in the reagan white house as an associate political director and he now works as a journalist interpreting -- and giving a trip to. >> it, "national review" online, "the wall street journal," "washington times" and many, many more. mike rosen, one of denver's most listened to radio talk show host now in its 28th year. he writes an editorial page column for "the denver post" and has been a frequent commentator on local and national tv. mike is a frequent v

david horowitz, for instance, has introduced the academic bill of rights to legally protect students from liberal orthodoxy while others like the young americas foundation sponsor conferences that introduce thousands of student on the right to celebrities in the movement. the clare boothe luce policy institute is targeted to college women while intellectual organizations like the intercollegiate studies institute started by william f. buckley or the federalist society or the institution for humane studies at george mason university provide internships and seminars for budding conservative academics and future jurists, and the list goes on with the support of foundations with many familiar names. while this movement to build a core of young ideological, dependable lawyers, journalists, congressional staff and voters has been a central priority of right, very few social scientists have studied the effort to mobilize these students or to examine just how these students experience their undergraduate lives in the first place. and this has left us in the odd situation of not knowing if th

and david mike rosen horowitz. maybe i can sharpen the central problem here with two short propositions and throw it back to the panel for further review, like your nfl refs "under the hood." he is saying majorities are always heterogenous by their nature. that is not new. that has always been true in american politics. the most successful, durable coalition ever was the new deal coalition. its constituent parts made no sense next to each other except on election day. go back and look at the late 30's and see people on the far left and see them complaining bitterly that the new deal wasn't far left enough, serious people -- party in the a tea 30's, we should call them the red bulls. campaign, like the spirit of the tea party, what does he have to do to put himself over the top? he thinks he has to name richard swygert as his running mate. hit damaged -- that damaged him in with conservatives. the letters are about two feet tall. what do we get in 1980? george h.w. bush. a catastrophic mistake in my opinion. politic

david horowitz, a nice number of our panel, one of the founders of the new left in the 1960's but has transitioned to combating those trying to destroy traditional american values, the founder of the david horowitz freedom center, and that is focused on academic freedom and returning universities to the principles of open inquiry and the fights of indoctrination of the class from. he is the founder of the students for academic freedom. jeffrey lloyd, our next speaker sparked this topic in an article that he wrote recently in the american spectator. he brings years of political expertise to the table. he served in the reagan white house as a necessity political director. jeffrey now works as a journalist to be material to the weekly standard, the american spectator, national review online, the "wall street journal," washington times, many more. mike rosen, one of denver's most listened to radio talk shows now in his 28 year on a 50 caylee writing and editorial page column for the denver post and has been a frequent commentator on local and national tv. mike is a frequent visitor, at le

david: kim forest, scott, thank you very much. todd horowitz, thank you as well. >> thank you. david: fed chair janet yellen, i almost said fed chairman, she doesn't like that term, made it clear is full steam ahead when it comes to tapering. but peter schiff is not buying it. he not only sees a halt to tapering but increase in money printing and bond buying. he is here to tell us why. >>> isn't the whole point of investing in something to get a return on your investment, roi? isn't it all about roi? investor tim cook, if you want returns, don't buy the stock. was this irresponsible of tim cook? steve forbes weighs in on that straight ahead. >>> we're heading back to liz who is in mountain view, california. liz? liz: david, from this to this. boy from the early stages of phones to this this you couldn't search for what movie you were going to watch tonight. back on that old thing but you can on this. coming up we're talking to the israeli entrepeneur who start ad company that says super search me. the ceo of jinni is coming up live from mountainview, california. ♪ [ bell ringing

david: gentlemen, great to see you both. thank you very much. todd horowitz thank you as well. pete benson, meb faber and of course todd horowitz. liz: they say history repeats itself. if that is true you will want to take out a pen and paper because coming up we're breaking down the stocks that have historically outperformed in the month of march and may have room to grow. plus we'll give you the best names to own in april as well. david: congressional investigators meanwhile are rapping up a probe why general motors waited almost a deck cradle to -- decade to recall 1.6 million cars that it knew it had ignition issues? is there anything that gm can do to appease consumers and legislators after this debacle. liz: we'll ask ralph nader, who made his name fighting for auto safety. don't miss this interview. ♪ [ male announcer ] what if a small company became big business overnight? ♪ like, really big... then expanded? ♪ or their new product tanked? ♪ or not? what if they embrace new technology instead? ♪ imagine a company's future with the future of trading. company profile. a r

david: nicole, thank you very much. sandra: thank you, nicole. s&p 500 futures closing in chicago in seven seconds. let's get back to todd horowitz. of the cme. todd, what are you seeing? >> we're going to close on our lows of the day here, down about 17 points in the s&p. i think you have got to watch 1840 in the cash as the key level. if we hold 1840 we'll stay in the 1840 to 1880 range. if we break 1840, look at 1800 on the way down. sandra: i love that kind of color from the raiding pits. i miss you in chicago, todd. >> we miss you too, we like her here. federal reserve rejecting to capital plans of five banks. hsbc, santander, citi, rbs and zions bancorp. what do you think of citi by the way? >> it's a shockomes really as a surprise, the company fails two out of the three previous years they have done the ccar. they have failed on both qualitative as well as aspects in terms of dividends as well as buyback. they, you note that b-of-a had to resubmit in terms of their capital distributions but citi was just an absolute, failure big shock to the market. the stock will get nicked pretty hard tomorrow. david: it closed a little o