look at what her former campaign staffers said and two former staffers, david keegan and kristen murray said she basically treated the campaign coffers like her piggy bank and routinely spent money for her personal lifestyle. this is the stuff that crimes are made of. this is embezzlement. this is no different than any other employee who steals from their job. >> christine o'donnell said we in the media shouldn't listen to your organization. she says basically you're a liberal group and the implication is you have partisan reasons. plenty of her supporters will say -- i don't want to use the term "witch hunt" but basically, you have an agenda and you're going after her. >> our track record is clear. we're a nonpartisan organization and we take folks on all sides of the aisle. it doesn't matter. we've come down just as heard on nathan deal of georgia running for governor, as greg meeks a congress in new york, democrat. charlie rangel and max seen waters. two other democrats we targeted. so we're looking for politicians to be honest with integrity and christine o'donnell doesn't exemplify

and as cnn's gary tuchman reported earlier, according to her former campaign finance consultant, david keegandid use campaign funds from earlier races for things like meals, gas, and to pay for bowling one time. so used campaign funds, check. the watchdog group we mentioned earlier, anderson, c.r.e.w., said she did some things, she didn't behave properly as a candidate. she did this while she was no longer candidate, therefore, it was illegal. beyond that, we could find no independent verification that she stiffed businesses or did not pay employees. there are some disputes over wages, but we couldn't find independent proof that she did this in some way that would excite attention here. her current campaign staff, while not flatly denying all those charges, says they are frivolous. but o'donnell was audited in 2008 and owed almost $12,000 to the irs. she appealed, thought there was some kind of error. there wasn't, and she ended up paying just this past spring. so the bottom line as we move forward from all these different charges that we have here is that when we put it on our scale, this co

finance records and talking to one of her former campaign aides, someone you had on last night, david keeganit turns out miss o'donnell has treated her campaign funds like they are -- her very own personal piggy bank. she's used that money to pay things like her rent, for gas, meals and even a bowling outing. and that's just flat out illegal. >> but, i mean, we had the checks on the program last night. and it's a couple hundred dollars here. a couple hundred dollars there. does it really amount to much of anything? >> by our count it amounts to well over $20,000 in 2009 and 2010. and that's just the funds that we can look at and look at as clearly illegal. the fact is the federal election commission needs to do an audit to find out all of the expenses that miss o'donnell has claimed as campaign related because it may well be that most them aren't. for example in 2009, miss odonnell wasn't a candidate for anything yet she had numerous campaign expenses. things like travel and gas and yet she had no actual campaign. >> we called, obviously, her spokesperson for comment. we didn't get a respons

>> we have a sworn statement from david keegan a former campaign staffer for ms.l back in 2008. and in addition, there was another person, a campaign manager, who made recorded calls the night before the election or the week before the election, another conservative who talked about the -- the problem with o'donnell routinely using campaign funds for personal use. and at the same time, not paying her campaign staff. >> what do you say to those -- well, that sound bite that we just played of her, was she lying? >> she was lying. but what do you expect her to say now? yeah, you caught me, i was stealing campaign money? >> and when you look at the way she has handled this, how sure are you that you're going to be able to get a prosecution here and that authorities will respond to this complaint? >> well, you can never be 100% sure that the department of justice, which doesn't have an amazing track record recently of taking on public officials, you can never be sure. but certainly there's enough evidence that they ought to be looking at this and the fec, the federal e