he couldn't from government an un agencies in companies owing to business based business, when david kendrick but the un recouped only about 10 percent of his investment last year. well, policies involved in the case, which is not going through an internal ewing court system, denied wrong doing with kendrick claiming the products of spill in progress. as those live now with legal asked media analyst law. i know it was good to see you . this is a while, the unusual case i must admit, involved in full is a large amount of money, but 60000000 doesn't seem to be a lot these days. but what's this about? well, 1st of all, my friend, you and i are in the wrong business. we should be doing whatever this is as the great us, senator everett dirksen, one time equipped a 1000000000 here and a 1000000000 there. and pretty soon you're talking about real money. this wasn't an individual who was given this money and he decided on his own perhaps without any kind of internal audit to hand over this money to someone. he met mr. kendrick from the new york times article. i've got to read this one line for you. t

i knew in agencies and companies own linked to british business when david kendrick but the new and recruit only about 10 percent of his investment last year. all parties involved in the case which is not going through an internal you are in court system, denied wrong doing with candidate claiming the products a still in progress. if i'm legal, i'm media, unless lyle, this is the you and has a, this dubbing, lack of supervision or is funds. this was an individual who was given this money and he decided on his own perhaps without any kind of internal audit to hand over this money to someone. he met mister kendrick, he has to repay the money, give a year's salary. and if he does not repay the money, the filing said internal filing solution to this, he will not be eligible for you when pension. now, in the old days, people what, who would do this would be looking at the full force of the most in, preferably, torrential of prosecutions. this seems to be as we say, the legal bis preparatory, would you please give this back? would, would you, do you see it in your heart and maybe throw it in by t