pedro: they joined by david mccabe of "the heel." thank you. announcer: c-span, created by cable companies and brought as a public service by your >> this sunday night on q&a. gary hart. comparing our current government to the republic our founders can intended. >> they use the language of the ancient republics of greek and wrote -- greece and rome and warned against corruption. their definition was not bribery, it was putting special interests ahead of the common good. by that definition, washington today is a massively corrupt place. >> sunday night at a eastern and specific on q&a. next on c-span, our new series landmark cases andores the human stories constitutional dramas behind some of the supreme court's most significant decisions. our first program focuses on marbury versus madison to establish the basis for judicial review. that is followed by today's rally on the national mall commemorating the 20th anniversary of the million man march area >> landmark cases explores the human story and constitutional drop was behind historic decision

. >> host: and also joining us, david mccabe of the hill, thank you for joining us. >> pleasure to be here. >> host: there's an effort in congress about who controls the internet, internet dominance, and you have a piece of legislation that deals specifically with this. could you set up our audience and let them know what the issue is and what your bill addresses? >> guest: well, it's called the dill -- the bill was originally called the dot.com act, and it was about icann's transition of the eye january that functions, who is the keeper of the addresses, how the internet operates. and there is kind of an international struggle, and the u.n. and some people saying, you know, the united states should not be the keeper of the final vestiges of a contract, and we should have a multi-stakeholder approach. the tech community has gathered support for that, and we got involved when the congress, especially the house, have gone on record saying we support a multi-stakeholder approach. i got involved when i said who are this multi-stakeholder, who is this group? let's define this group. at fir