and david mccabe warned: "if the bbc is not careful, the continued exposure of everything connected withill turn her into another diana. this preoccupation with every aspect of her life and lifestyle is bordering on intrusion. we all know what happened with diana." the impression some had that the wedding build—up was taking over bbc news was reinforced by a new version of the countdown sequence, leading up to the headlines on the news channel. normally it features bbc reporters on location, but from thursday that was replaced by up to a minute's worth of images of guess who? benedict adams emailed: "i notice that the 60 second ‘what we do' trailer at the top of the hour has been changed to show 57 seconds of harry and meghan. this was about the time on bbc breakfast on friday not given over to the royal wedding. have bbc journalists been given the day off as there was no news, just froth, speculation and fawning?" but the main pre—wedding focus this week was an on—off issue which seemed at times to be turning into a latin american soap opera. every twist and turn was followed by bbc new

david. first of all, james comey is bared. andrew mccaber of the fbi, he is out, and they really had to push him out. christopher wray did not want him out. chief of staff of the fbi is out, baker, counsel for the fbi, page, of the strzok love birds, she's out, and right now, doesn't this signal to the american people that this is a cabal that is so corrupt, that we have got no choice but to recognize that the obama administration was an administration that was focused on making sure that hillary clinton won. >> yes. and you had eric holder, who left the job of attorney general to go run anyo organization whoe chief focus was to elect democrats. that is what he is doing right now. his goal is to elect more democrats to state and local offices around the country. let the obama administration to run this organization. added to that, you now have the constant drumbeat by democratic congressional candidates that it's time for impeachment. and the more that americans hear about that, that is what isca happening in these primaries, they i are not

david, you listen all of this. as i said, pretty much every day, everyone is doing the reporting, finding stories. this is andrew mccabe'smehow, the story got out today that he wrote about this while he was in there. and submitted it. and it is in mueller's hands, what i go back to his rod rosenstein, he ultimately wrote the memo. right. i would assume if he did not believe what was in the memo or he was against what was in the memo, arguing for the firing of james comey, that he would have clicked or walked out the door? >> i believe exactly that, that rod rosenstein would have never put his name on a memo that he did not believe in 100%. >> martha: i would hope not. >> i do not believe for one minute that he would've done that. but leak and he mccabe here, this is an interesting thing, we are reading about the memo that he produced. i do not know how the reporters got it, but we do know that the fbi, the former fbi acting director andrew mccabe has a big problem ahead of him for leaking. and so now we see another leak. and leaking andy, he is going to be facing prosecution, because horwitz, the -- >> martha: that is wh

david? >> james comey has pretty much discredited himself about one day you don't know what he is saying is true or not. him and mccabe are now in this leaking out who did what stuff. here is the bigger question. why is maria's colleague, eric holder, not before a committee asking what he did in his justice -- that he overseen as the head of the justice department who left the justice department and ran -- now running an organization to elect democrats and defeat republicans. if that is his mentality now. was that his mentality when he was running the show for president obama? >> harris: are you calling for a hearing on that. >> he absolutely should be asked what he knows about all of this. >> maria: going back to what katie said, i actually agree i do think we need transtarren (is i. some allegations put out in the press not backed up by evidence in part because there is so much classified information there is a lot of insinuations being thrown around i would argue for partisan purposes to defend the president and discredit the russia investigation that i actually want all the information out there. because i don't t

david: and frankly i'm not sure that i buy the fact that all of these fbi officials who were anti-donald trump i mean people like peter strzok, bruce ohr at the department of justice, andy mccabelost his job because he wasn't frank and then of course fusion gps which kind of worked like a subcontractor hired by the hillary campaign, i can't believe that they would be put in the trump campaign to help donald trump. >> well, again, our government when you're the nominee for president, we help you. we give you secret service protection, we give you cia briefings, and if there was a counterintelligence and concern that russians or anybody else was trying to infiltrate the campaign they should be telling the president that, but they didn't seem to do that, and that's why it becomes highly suspicious and we need more information. david: we need more information that's the bottom line. the wall street journal had an editorial it seems like months ago but a week ago titled the informant who wasn't spying and they were being sarcastic about that because they did think it was a spy in the trump campaign. they said the public deserves to know who tasked the informant to seek out trump ca