. >> you know, you and your partner, david miranda, seem to have come under government scrutiny. last month david was stopped at

kept threatening me about going to jail. >> that was david miranda.eaking to the bbc, theresa may said that he was potentially carrying information that was useful. believe theyice have someone in their possession with information which could help terrorists, which could lead to a loss of life, they could enact the peace act. >> the white house had acknowledged that british authorities had given them the heads up to detain miranda. they took questions on the issue in august. >> you talk about the egyptian legal matter, publicly motivated detention. mr. greenwald partner, you call it a law enforcement action. do you have any concerns about the uk's law enforcement? a specific have reaction other than to observe to you that this was an observance made by the british government, not one with the involvement of the u.s. government. as far to will not go say that you are concerned. what i am suggesting is this was a decision made by the british government without the involvement and not at the request of the united states government. alan rusbridger, can y

deemed sensitive to national security was placed in detention upon a rifle at heathrow airport david miranda partner of guardian journalist glenn greenwald was held for nine hours the maximum time a person can be held using laws designed to capture terrorists you know one of the reasons why we're so concerned and when i look at the work our press freedom department does which is which has a global reach one of the issues that we have because the united kingdom is saying about. freedom with a very strong record on ensuring that it. can write the new and so so for grabs it does appear that the press freedom situation in the united kingdom is sliding and there is a great concern it is twenty thirteen freedom of speech seen here reporters without borders gives the satisfactory situation rating but for freedom of the press britain slipped from nineteenth in two thousand and ten to its current ranking of twenty ninth many concerned that showed you a servant of the terrorism act the law used to detain miranda certainly being used to stop journalists doing their job of holding people in power to acc

deemed sensitive to national security was placed in detention upon arrival at heathrow airport david miranda partner of guardian journalist glenn greenwald was held for nine hours is the maximum time a person can be held using laws designed to catch a terrorist you know one of the reasons why we're so concerned and when i look at the work chris freedom department does which is which has a global reach one of the issues that we have united kingdom is saying about. freedom with a very strong record on ensuring that it. can write the new and so so for around. here. the press freedom situation in the united kingdom is this sliding and this is of great concern it is twenty thirteen freedom of speech seen here reporters without borders gives the satisfactory situation rating but for freedom of the press britain slipped from nineteenth in two thousand and ten to its current ranking of twenty ninth many are concerned that should chill serving of the terrorism act the law used to detain miranda is actually being used to stop journalists doing their job of holding people in power to account rather tha

you may remember that act it's also what was used last month to detain glenn greenwald's partner david miranda for nine hours at london's heathrow airport of course police found they had either men had no connection with terrorism and they were both released but during his detention on monday mr shabaan was asked a series of questions about his charity work in particular his advocacy for victims of drone strikes in yemen according to mr shape on a border agent questioned what if your organization did something bad to your government what if you were here because of the bad things your organization has done to your government the relations between yemen and the u.k. are important i want to know that your organization is not disrupting that again we're referring to a charity organization an organization known as reprieve and following this incident the strategic director at reprieve corey kreider warns. this is part of a worsening campaign of intimidation of human rights workers going on at the u.k. border especially if they are critical of the so-called war on terror if there were any doubt the

. >> you know, you and your partner, david miranda, seem to have come under government scrutiny. st month david was stopped at an airport in britain for nine hours. he was held by the authorities. do you worry that your movements, your travel will be restricted in the future and is that going to in any way inhibit your reporting? >> well, thomas jefferson warned 250 years ago that those who most fear investigations of their actions are always the first to attack a free press. obviously the idea of trying to criminalize investigative journalism, the idea that if you have classified information that you're responsibly reported on that means you can be detained under terrorism statutes or even declared a criminal is exactly what jefferson was warning about. of course the u.s. and the u.k. governments are furious. not that we're exposing things that harm national security, because we haven't, that we're exposing things that harm their political interests and their credibility. and so, of course when the world's most powerful governments start attacking you, start targeting you and you

miranda le secuestraron a un hijo que jamÁs volviÓ a ver. alejandro martÍ recuperÓ el al suyo muerto. el pequeÑo davidsolo una travesura. >>> para la gente siempre le escucho que dice, que andan robando niÑos y aunque no fue secuestrado. al film no recibiÓ un castigo. si no una consola de video juegos. en mÉxico, raÚl torres, telemundo. >>> capturaron a 3 sospechosos mÁs en el sonado caso heaven de mÉxico 12 jÓvenes mexicanos fueron secuestrados y meses despuÉs de contras sin vida en una fosa comÚn. la procuradurÍa general anuncio zoi que los 3 sujetos arrestados confesaron participar en el asesinato de los 12 jÓvenes mÁs otra vÍctima, 2 implicados mÁs estÁn en la carcel desde el lunes. las autoridades sospechan que ira una venganza por la neuro te de un narco men dista. >>> en mÉxico, sandra avila beltrÁn conocido como la reina del pacÍfico sufriÓ un doble revÉs judicial un juzgado le negÓ definitivamente el des congelamiento de sus bienes que le confiscaron cuando fue acusada de delito y lavado de dinero en el 2007 y denegÓ su traslado de una prisiÓn de nayarit y una cÁrcel estatal en jalisco. fue d

miranda, abc7 news. >>> a 13 your old long lawsuit against manufactures of lead-based paint is wrapping up in san jose. ten counties are seeking $1 billion to cleanup residences. reporter davidns what's at stake. >> the use of lead-based paint was banned in 1978 but the risk remains in older homes and buildings. the u.s. centers for disease control and prevention projects more than half a million children may have unhealthy levels of led. the paint industry said it didn't know for decades that lead and paint were dangerous. when it did it paid fees to support education and prevention programs. but five companies are being sued by three cities in seven counties that say that isn't enough. >> they don't remove the lead paint from homes. so until you remove the lead paint from homes, children are still going to get poisoned and that's the remedy we are seeing in this lawsuit. >> oakland, san francisco and the bay area counties of santa clara, almeda and solano are using the state public nuisance law for the lawsuit. the attorney general for california points out a similar strategy in other states have failed. >> seven other states, supreme courts have looked at this very same e

miranda, abc 7 news. >>> a 13year-long lawsuit against manufacturers of lead-based paint is wrapping up in san jose. ten california cities and counties are seeking $1 billion to clean up residences. davide explains what's at stake. >> reporter: the use of lead-based paint was banned in 1978 but the risk remains in older homes and buildings. the u.s. centers for disease control and prevention projects more than 500,000 children may have unhealthy levels of lead. the paint industry says it didn't know for decades that lead in paint was dangerous. when it did, it paid fees to support prevention programs. five companies are being sued by three cities and seven counties that say that isn't enough. >> they don't remove the lead paint from homes. until you do, children are still going to get poisoned. and that is the remedy we're seeking in this lawsuit. >> reporter: oakland, san francisco and the bay area counties of santa clara, alameda, san mateo and solano are bringing the lawsuit. but the california attorney general points out a similar strategy in other states has failed. >> seven other state supreme courts have looked at this very same evidence, the same issues. and in every instance s

miranda, abc7 news. >>> a 13-year long lawsuit against manufacturers of lead-based paint is wrapping up in san jose. ten california cities and counties are seeking $1 billion to clean up residences. reporter davidouie explains what's at stake. >> the use of lead-based paint was banned in 1978 but the risk remains in older homes and buildings. the u.s. centers for disease control and prevention projects more than half a million children may have unhealthy levels of led. the paint industry said it didn't know for decades that lead and paint were dangerous. when it did, it paid fees to support education and prevention programs. but five companies are being sued by three cities in seven counties that say that isn't enough. >> they don't remove the lead paint from homes. so until you remove the lead paint from homes, children are still going to get poisoned and that's the remedy we are seeing -- seeking in this lawsuit. >> oakland, san francisco and the bay area counties of santa clara, almeda and solano are using the state public nuisance law for the lawsuit. however, the former iowa attorney general, who speaks on behalf of the industry, points out a similar strategy in other states have failed. >

miranda rights and as a result they believe that she deserves a new trial. bond was posted at $250,000 and she's out. >> there's a concern, too, that she might run. david, i want to ask you this. there are two men that she was said to have hired for the insurance policy that were out in the woods. they are both incarcerated. >> the prosecutor could say, you're on death row now, i'll give you life in exchange for your testimony. but that detective, he brought deborah into the room and got a confession, no video recording or an audio. the problem is they didn't know there were eight other cases thrown out of court because of lying under oath and violating the constitutional rights of defendants. now the jury will know about that. this case could blow up for the prosecutor and she could walk free when the trial begins in september. september 30th, actually. >> if they do another trial, bob, and the result is the same and she's convicted again, would she go back to death row? >> well, obviously if it goes to trial again i assume there's going to be a penalty phase all over again and she would go to death row because there's going to be a new trial. you won