>> i do. >> thank you. >> in a 2013 deposition, candice interviewed detective david o'callahan aboute street files. >> do you understand that mr. fields had the right to see those notes at the time that he was charged with the murders? >> i would assume so. >> and so for you to sit here 30 years later and say every one of those tips and documents in that file has been refuted when he and his attorneys never had a chance to look at them contemporaneously, do you understand the problem with that? >> i -- >> objection. form of the question, foundation. you may answer. >> all right. here's what i'm saying as we sit here today. >> please answer my question. >> okay. i don't know whether he saw or did not see those files. i'm taking your word he did not. i'm saying that if he did have those files, and did or did not have those files, it would make no difference to his guilt in this case. >> at nate's civil trial in 2014, his team came armed with affidavits from eyewitnesss, claiming detective o'callahan coached them and offered favors in return for identifying fields as the shooter. >> he