. >> (4a) appeal no. 23-020 david osgood, appellant(s) vs. dept.f building inspection, respondent planning dept. approval 101 spear street. appealing the issuance on may 11, 2023, to hudson rincon center llc, of an alteration permit (sign c: install two illuminated double-faced projecting blade signs for "tenant xyz rincon center"). permit no. 2021/0525/1018. for hearing today. (4b) appeal no. 23-021 david osgood, appellant(s) vs. dept. of building inspection, respondent planning dept. approval 101 spear street. appealing the issuance on may 11, 2023, to hudson rincon center llc, of an alteration permit (sign d: install one nonilluminated single face canopy sign for "tenant xyz"). permit no. 2021/0525/1021. for hearing today. (4c) appeal no. 23-022 david osgood, appellant(s) vs. dept. of building inspection, respondent planning dept. approval 101 spear street. appealing the issuance on may 12, 2023, to hudson rincon center llc, of an alteration permit (erect an electric, single-faced wall sign "rincon"; four total). permit no. 2021/0525/1015. for h

the appellant is david osgood.id believes there should be no changes to the existing signs and no addition of any signs on the property. i understand that david has also expressed concerns about the two existing projecting signs on the property. these projecting signs he noted in his brief and presentations. he is concerned with are 25 feet tall and 5 feet wide near the mid-block of the property of spears and stewart street. however, there is no proposal to alter or modify these two existing projecting signs and as such those two signs are not part of any permits before the board. as you heard from the project team, the proposed scope of work under these four permits complies with the planning code. article 6 of the planning code authorize the regulation of the signs. there is no limit to the number of signs that you can have on this property. and because the property is not within the vicinity of the school, park or rec's and parks facility or freeway, there is no limit to the size of the sign. as such, the propos

. >> i'm david osgood, the appellant. i have lived at rincon center for almost 30 years, almost half of my life. by the way, will you let me know if you have trouble hearing me. please feel free to interrupt. thanks to staff in helping in the preparation of all this. i see one familiar face. i understand that many of you are attorneys. i hope you agree that the city should not be giving special treatment to those simply because they are managed poorly. i hope you also agree this is more than just a legal matter. we believe, it's our understanding that you are not just acting as judges interpreting code. our understanding is that your de novo capacity is that you are pretty much starting the process as new and also wearing your legal hats and hats of negotiate ors. there is a hat at city hall and the process should be stream lined and i think there is pressure on people throughout city hall to come to the aid of businesses and so forth. nobody, no officials at the state or local level have ever said that this city should l

hi commissioners, it's david osgood, the appellant from two weeks ago. as far as the minutes, um, i think the first line on page four, not the heading but the first line under that refers to code. section 1,000.6. shouldn't that be 1006 0.6. thank you. i'm sorry. page four 1006 we will double check that. that's correct. correct. yeah. yeah okay. can you can you adjust that, please? thank you. thank you for your eagle eye. so do would you like. no problem. would you like. is there any further public comment on this item? please raise your hand. okay seeing none. do you want to make up? actually make a motion then to incorporate that change as well from the public commenter. oh okay. so we have a motion to adopt the minutes as amended by commissioner trevino . commissioner lundberg and the public speaker. so on that motion, commissioner lundberg, a commission, commissioner eppler, i present. okay. that motion carries 4 to 0 and the minutes are adopted as amended. thank you. so we are now moving on to item number four. this is appeal number 23 0242 non vers