i would say that david parrell's files, and i know dylan and his team have their own files, but david'siles were massive. i mean we're talking canterbury tales massive. the reason that i agreed to participate in this process now was not an easy decision because i don't like -- >> why did you? >> because dylan showed me the article. there were names in there that i didn't feel should be in there, friends of mine, confidential sources he didn't realize were confidential. i said to him, okay, i will participate provided i can compare your article to my journals, take out these names, and, most importantly, and this is going to have the auto of hypocrisy considering the article itself, i wanted to write an editorial condemning the salacious of reporting now. the "new york times" has been the "enquirer, and the "enquirer" has been the "new york times," so we have to set the world right side up again. >> your job was to hide the scandals. you're saying they had an open marriage. you're talking about hookers, you're talking about dirty trips, buying off journalist and much more. why don't you