david pillpel. for general public comment today, i already conveyed a couple of things about the minutes to the commission secretary, so i didn't need to take up your time on item three. my only item here is that my thoughts are with jill thompson, long time retired commission secretary. i hope that she's okay. i heard a recent report that she is going down, and i wonder if vice president moran could convey my thoughts. and while we're on the thought, the other commission secretary, mary jung, who am i forgetting? renee baldridge, and mary rodriguez, i hope they're doing well, as well, so just a shoutout to retired commission secretaries. thanks very much. >> operator: thank you for your comment. next caller, your line is open. you have two minutes. >> yeah, my name is francisco dacosta. some of you know me, and i'm here to remind you all that you all have to represent the people, and that's not happening. and so when we get an opportunity, it's not because we cannot do something else. it's very hel

david pillpel. for general public comment today, i already conveyed a couple of things about the minutes to the commission secretary, so i didn't need to take up your time on item three. my only item here is that my thoughts are with jill thompson, long time retired commission secretary. i hope that she's okay. i heard a recent report that she is going down, and i wonder if vice president moran could convey my thoughts. and while we're on the thought, the other commission secretary, mary jung, who am i forgetting? renee baldridge, and mary rodriguez, i hope they're doing well, as well, so just a shoutout to retired commission secretaries. thanks very much. >> operator: thank you for your comment. next caller, your line is open. you have two minutes. >> yeah, my name is francisco dacosta. some of you know me, and i'm here to remind you all that you all have to represent the people, and that's not happening. and so when we get an opportunity, it's not because we cannot do something else. it's very hel

david pillpell. on item nine. i take a different approach from those previous speakers. the presentation on this item is not posted on the website. i he or she request a copy of that presentation and i just want to reinforce, this is exactly the kind of item, this is exactly why these staff presentations while we're meeting online like this need to be posted whether they were provided to the commission secretary by the deadline or created beforehand. they need to be posted. the public needs to be able to see the slide not just by staff, but when they refer to them. i've made my point on that. i would ask whether other nearby public buildings muni has some facilities there. animal care and control is in the neighborhood. there's public right of way and a treat avenue which is an old railroad right of way. were those locations considered? i don't know. the city should have design immunity on a project like this but i don't know how this relates to the resolution from that item. 21-204 and staff has not provided a copy of that settlement agreement in response to my records

david pillpell. on item nine. i take a different approach from those previous speakers. the presentation on this item is not posted on the website. i he or she request a copy of that presentation and i just want to reinforce, this is exactly the kind of item, this is exactly why these staff presentations while we're meeting online like this need to be posted whether they were provided to the commission secretary by the deadline or created beforehand. they need to be posted. the public needs to be able to see the slide not just by staff, but when they refer to them. i've made my point on that. i would ask whether other nearby public buildings muni has some facilities there. animal care and control is in the neighborhood. there's public right of way and a treat avenue which is an old railroad right of way. were those locations considered? i don't know. the city should have design immunity on a project like this but i don't know how this relates to the resolution from that item. 21-204 and staff has not provided a copy of that settlement agreement in response to my records

. >> david pillpel. it looks like on sfgovtv channel 2, it looks like we're getting the tail end of the health meeting two weeks ago, so i don't see where the m.t.a. board -- i guess i'll jog around and see if it's covered in some other way or maybe they can attend to that. hopefully someone there is listening. i had two items on the minutes. i read the proposed changes in a phone message to miss silva a few minutes back on page 16. my two public comments, just some minor changes. so it would be david pel pill -- pillpel identified a number of issues in the staff report, comments on slide presentation, and opined, o-p-i-n-e-d, and then, on the next page [inaudible] insert recently and will follow up regarding insert the transit investment strategy. so those are my requested corrections, and i read those into a phone message for miss silva, so if you could make those changes. otherwise, i thought those were comprehensive for your longest meeting so far this year, 8.5 hours, but they were great. thank you

. >> david pillpel.oks like on sfgovtv channel 2, it looks like we're getting the tail end of the health meeting two weeks ago, so i don't see where the m.t.a. board -- i guess i'll jog around and see if it's covered in some other way or maybe they can attend to that. hopefully someone there is listening. i had two items on the minutes. i read the proposed changes in a phone message to miss silva a few minutes back on page 16. my two public comments, just some minor changes. so it would be david pel pill -- pillpel identified a number of issues in the staff report, comments on slide presentation, and opined, o-p-i-n-e-d, and then, on the next page [inaudible] insert recently and will follow up regarding insert the transit investment strategy. so those are my requested corrections, and i read those into a phone message for miss silva, so if you could make those changes. otherwise, i thought those were comprehensive for your longest meeting so far this year, 8.5 hours, but they were great. thank you so muc

. >> caller: it's david pillpel, it's confusing because i'm monitoring three different meetings and for some reason the webex event on the screen doesn't allow me to raise my hand on the screen so i had to hang up and call in for public comment, if there's a way you can adjust the participant role sso i participate via webex then i can save one device. it's confusing. plus, i can't figure out who all is participating. i can he see some people, but not others. it's just a limited participant role. it's different from how it's been set up in the past. ok, on this item, the mobile recycling program, i want to support all of the work that kevin has been doing, which is substantial to make this happen. lots of big concepts, lots of details trying to make it something for the public to use and also to bring greater awareness and connect it to other programs and climate and all of the urgency that i'm sure he spoke about. also, in reference to state secretaries of the relevant agencies, there are jerred bloomenfeld and ray crowfoot, from san francisco, our people who understand this department

david pillpell. i just wanted to agree with supervisor preston's observations that this is the kind of ordinance that doesn't get as much press, but has a lot of impact. i wanted to thank supervisor safai for him and his staff and their considerable work on this, the city attorney, the various folks at the department of the environment, james, jack, robert, debbie, jennifer, charles, eden, i may be missing folks. anyway, great work. i'm sure there's more to do on c.n.d., it's a big and complicated area. but this is a significant step forward and thank you to all who've labored hard to make this happen. thanks again. >> clerk: thank you. next speaker, please. >> chairman: madam clerk, i was wondering if there are any mr. speakers in the queue. agnes, could you please make an announcement in chinese what is item number one because folks are not understanding that this is not the lincoln park item. they're just hearing item number one. so if you can make that announcement and go back to the queue if you

david pillpell.agree with supervisor preston's observations that this is the kind of ordinance that doesn't get as much press, but has a lot of impact. i wanted to thank supervisor safai for him and his staff and their considerable work on this, the city attorney, the various folks at the department of the environment, james, jack, robert, debbie, jennifer, charles, eden, i may be missing folks. anyway, great work. i'm sure there's more to do on c.n.d., it's a big and complicated area. but this is a significant step forward and thank you to all who've labored hard to make this happen. thanks again. >> clerk: thank you. next speaker, please. >> chairman: madam clerk, i was wondering if there are any mr. speakers in the queue. agnes, could you please make an announcement in chinese what is item number one because folks are not understanding that this is not the lincoln park item. they're just hearing item number one. so if you can make that announcement and go back to the queue if you're not here to sp

david pillpell. i just wanted to agree with supervisor preston's observations that this is the kind of ordinance that doesn't get as much press, but has a lot of impact. i wanted to thank supervisor safai for him and his staff and their considerable work on this, the city attorney, the various folks at the department of the environment, james, jack, robert, debbie, jennifer, charles, eden, i may be missing folks. anyway, great work. i'm sure there's more to do on c.n.d., it's a big and complicated area. but this is a significant step forward and thank you to all who've labored hard to make this happen. thanks again. >> clerk: thank you. next speaker, please. >> chairman: madam clerk, i was wondering if there are any mr. speakers in the queue. agnes, could you please make an announcement in chinese what is item number one because folks are not understanding that this is not the lincoln park item. they're just hearing item number one. so if you can make that announcement and go back to the queue if you

david pillpel. on item 4, i'm not sure why this item is here and not at the budget committee, but fine. so be it. i did comment to the sfmta when it was there and did not get any comments. i would be happy to hear anything from my old friend steven lee and others. i note this is a canadian company. i note if there's any american company that would be available to do the work. on page 88 of your packet, the hardware disposal for the old meters and batteries and parts will result in a lot of material that should be reused or recycled. there's not a lot of language in there about what happens. this committee and the board has been very concerned about the climate action plan and waste materials, and it would be nice to hear something about what we're doing with the disposal of hardware. on pages 172 and 173, the data centers are also in canada. should we also be worried with cyberattacks. this does relate to m.t.a.s state of good repair program and cost control, but i don't know about the big picture,