for seat 6 i would also reappoint david pilpel. seat 8, todd david. seat 10 louise fischer. on my -- people that i felt comfortable with would be for seat 1 mark rumold, seat 2ali winston, seat 5 allyson washburn, and seat 9 chris hyland. so, the ones i actually named were all reappointments or they are specific to a group. that's what i would like to move forward with. so -- >> it appears that we are in agreement on three appointments today and unfortunately there are only two of us. so, it looks like david pilpel seat 6, [speaker not understood] fishier [speaker not understood]. with those three can we perhaps make a motion to send those forward to the full board with the committee report? the city attorney has something to say. >> mr. chair, we were going to recommend that you duplicate the hearing file. send the original one, make a motion, and submit out. as a committee report, the duplicated file amended to only indicate the remaining seats and then continue that to the call of the chair. >> do i need to make that -- do we need to make that [speaker not understood]? >>

so, with that said, then, today i would like to make a motion to see if we can nominate david pilpel for seat 6, louise fischer for seat 10, todd david for seat 8. rodman martin for seat 7. and samuel mccormick seat 11. and all those are really took into consideration not only your application and your testimony today, but also all the background information, some experiences as well. so, with that, i'm happy to see what my colleague would like to say as well. >> similarly, the remark of having a diverse group of people is high on my agenda and it' been high on every committee, tac, commission and so forth, that we've been able to appoint. ~ it's we bring this up all the time. i'm also looking at the, if this is the correct record, of who missed meetings and so forth. it looks like at least for a while, there's always been a quorum so i'm not sure what people are saying. on this sheet, started 6-12, 6-6-12, there's never been more than looks like two people that were absent from the meeting. there are some overlaps in regards to the people you named. for seat 6 i would also reappoint

so, with that said, then, today i would like to make a motion to see if we can nominate david pilpel seat 6, louise fischer for seat 10, todd david for seat 8. rodman martin for seat 7. and samuel mccormick seat 11. and all those are really took into consideration not only your application and your testimony today, but also all the background information, some experiences as well. so, with that, i'm happy to see what my colleague would like to say as well. >> similarly, the remark of having a diverse group of people is high on my agenda and it' been high on every committee, tac,

next person, david pilpel. >> good afternoon, david pilpel. i think you both know my background pretty well. i've been involved in city government for going on 30 years since i was a teenager. in a variety of agencies, all kinds of places. i have served on the task force. i'm on my third nonconsecutive tour of duty, as it were. i've served for 10-1/2 years out of the 20 years that the task force has been in existence. i was involved at the time when the ordinance was drafted, when the prop g was on the ballot in 1999. and a number of the amendments that were made in the late '90s before prop g was on the ballot. i certainly support meaningful public participation and open government. i look for practical solutions with city agencies and [speaker not understood] and others. i know that the -- i know very well both that the task force is not perfect and that i'm not perfect and that we can all do better and try to make this work a little better. i have said a number of times that i'm interested in fewer complaints and i'm actually less intereste

applicants of which presumably you would need to cut out one more or two, rather, i can only say that david pilpel had a long history of doing everything he can against the public interest and when he says he's got a [speaker not understood], i'm sure that's probably correct and it's probably because he is impervious to sympathy for the public.